Is UAV-SfM surveying ready to replace traditional surveying techniques?

ABSTRACT The creation of high-resolution Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) through the acquisition of images with a consumer-grade camera mounted on a light Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and their processing with Structure from Motion (SfM) software has been widely adopted in different fields. Despite this wide adoption, its use has been limited to research projects – as in our experience most practising surveyors, think that the topography obtained through this technology is subpar to that obtained with surveys undertaken with traditional methods. To address this concern, we compare these two approaches in a heterogeneous built-up area of nearly 33 ha with an elevation between 1899 and 1944 m a.s.l. This comparison shows that the UAV-SfM methodology provides better results than the traditional method, is less prone to human error and also requires significantly less time: 4 h of fieldwork instead of 1 week. Furthermore, the spatial resolution of a Total Station (TS) survey is only limited to those points surveyed, whereas the UAV-SfM derived topography is a subproduct of the resultant three dimensional point cloud, which can also be used to generate a high-resolution orthophoto.

[1]  Paul R. Wolf,et al.  Surveying and Mapping: History, Current Status, and Future Projections , 2002 .

[2]  F. Agüera-Vega,et al.  Accuracy of Digital Surface Models and Orthophotos Derived from Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Photogrammetry , 2017 .

[3]  T. Pock,et al.  Point Clouds: Lidar versus 3D Vision , 2010 .

[4]  Livio Pinto,et al.  Experimental analysis of different software packages for orientation and digital surface modelling from UAV images , 2014, Earth Science Informatics.

[5]  Mark A. Fonstad,et al.  Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement , 2013 .

[6]  J. Labadz,et al.  The potential of small unmanned aircraft systems and structure-from-motion for topographic surveys: A test of emerging integrated approaches at Cwm Idwal, North Wales , 2014 .

[7]  Dana H. Ballard,et al.  Computer Vision , 1982 .

[8]  Giordano Teza,et al.  Morphological Analysis for Architectural Applications: Comparison between Laser Scanning and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry , 2016 .

[9]  Charles D. Ghilani,et al.  Elementary Surveying: An Introduction to Geomatics , 2005 .

[10]  Andreas Kääb,et al.  Terrain changes from images acquired on opportunistic flights by SfM photogrammetry , 2016 .

[11]  J. Brasington,et al.  Modeling the topography of shallow braided rivers using Structure-from-Motion photogrammetry , 2014 .

[12]  Ruedi Boesch,et al.  Accuracy Assessment of Digital Surface Models from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles' Imagery on Glaciers , 2017, Remote. Sens..

[13]  J. Carrivick,et al.  2. The Place of Structure from Motion , 2016 .

[14]  G. Buffi,et al.  Survey of the Ridracoli Dam: UAV–based photogrammetry and traditional topographic techniques in the inspection of vertical structures , 2017 .

[15]  F. Visser,et al.  Quantifying submerged fluvial topography using hyperspatial resolution UAS imagery and structure from motion photogrammetry , 2015 .

[16]  M. Perrelli,et al.  Monitoring a Landslide with High Accuracy by Total Station: A DTM-Based Model to Correct for the Atmospheric Effects , 2018 .

[17]  J. A. Gomez,et al.  Comparing the accuracy of several field methods for measuring gully erosion , 2012 .

[18]  Srikanth Saripalli,et al.  Rapid mapping of ultrafine fault zone topography with structure from motion , 2014 .

[19]  Azriel Rosenfeld,et al.  Computer Vision , 1988, Adv. Comput..

[20]  Marcie L. Venter,et al.  MAPPING MATACANELA: THE COMPLEMENTARY WORK OF LIDAR AND TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY IN SOUTHERN VERACRUZ, MEXICO , 2017, Ancient Mesoamerica.

[21]  Andrew Nelson,et al.  DEM production methods and sources , 2009 .

[22]  Chengcui Zhang,et al.  A progressive morphological filter for removing nonground measurements from airborne LIDAR data , 2003, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[23]  Irene Marzolff,et al.  Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) for Monitoring Soil Erosion in Morocco , 2012, Remote. Sens..

[24]  J. Ryan,et al.  UAV photogrammetry and structure from motion to assess calving dynamics at Store Glacier, a large outlet draining the Greenland ice sheet , 2015 .

[25]  M. Dodd.  Where are my quadrats? Positional accuracy in fieldwork , 2011 .

[26]  J. McNair,et al.  Measuring Streambank Erosion: A Comparison of Erosion Pins, Total Station, and Terrestrial Laser Scanner , 2018, Water.

[27]  Toby N. Tonkin,et al.  Ground-Control Networks for Image Based Surface Reconstruction: An Investigation of Optimum Survey Designs Using UAV Derived Imagery and Structure-from-Motion Photogrammetry , 2016, Remote. Sens..

[28]  P. Lacan,et al.  A low cost technique for development of ultra-high resolution topography: application to a dry maar's bottom , 2016 .

[29]  H. Mitásová,et al.  Interpolation by regularized spline with tension: I. Theory and implementation , 1993 .

[30]  F. Giannone,et al.  First geomatic restitution of the sinkhole known as ‘Pozzo del Merro’ (Italy), with the integration and comparison of ‘classic’ and innovative geomatic techniques , 2018, Environmental Earth Sciences.

[31]  S. M. Jong,et al.  High-resolution monitoring of Himalayan glacier dynamics using unmanned aerial vehicles , 2014 .

[32]  S. Robson,et al.  Optimising UAV topographic surveys processed with structure-from-motion: Ground control quality, quantity and bundle adjustment , 2016 .

[33]  Interpolation by Regularized Spline with Tension � , 2022 .

[34]  Subandriyo,et al.  Morphological and structural changes at the Merapi lava dome monitored in 2012–15 using unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) , 2018 .

[35]  C. A. Morales,et al.  Comparison Between Multicopter Uav and Total Station for Estimating Stockpile Volumes , 2015 .

[36]  N. G. Midgley,et al.  Moraine-mound formation by englacial thrusting: the Younger Dryas moraines of Cwm Idwal, North Wales , 2000, Geological Society, London, Special Publications.

[37]  J. Travelletti,et al.  UAV-based remote sensing of the Super-Sauze landslide : evaluation and results. , 2012 .

[38]  C. Rennie,et al.  Influence of Meander Confinement on Hydro-Morphodynamics of a Cohesive Meandering Channel , 2018 .

[39]  J. Gonçalves,et al.  UAV photogrammetry for topographic monitoring of coastal areas , 2015 .

[40]  M. Seddaiu,et al.  The use of an unmanned aerial vehicle for fracture mapping within a marble quarry (Carrara, Italy): photogrammetry and discrete fracture network modelling , 2017 .

[41]  Arko Lucieer,et al.  Direct Georeferencing of Ultrahigh-Resolution UAV Imagery , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[42]  M. Westoby,et al.  ‘Structure-from-Motion’ photogrammetry: A low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications , 2012 .

[43]  A. Dégre,et al.  The evaluation of unmanned aerial system-based photogrammetry and terrestrial laser scanning to generate DEMs of agricultural watersheds , 2014 .