The Rate of Beneficial Mutations Surfing on the Wave of a Range Expansion

Many theoretical and experimental studies suggest that range expansions can have severe consequences for the gene pool of the expanding population. Due to strongly enhanced genetic drift at the advancing frontier, neutral and weakly deleterious mutations can reach large frequencies in the newly colonized regions, as if they were surfing the front of the range expansion. These findings raise the question of how frequently beneficial mutations successfully surf at shifting range margins, thereby promoting adaptation towards a range-expansion phenotype. Here, we use individual-based simulations to study the surfing statistics of recurrent beneficial mutations on wave-like range expansions in linear habitats. We show that the rate of surfing depends on two strongly antagonistic factors, the probability of surfing given the spatial location of a novel mutation and the rate of occurrence of mutations at that location. The surfing probability strongly increases towards the tip of the wave. Novel mutations are unlikely to surf unless they enjoy a spatial head start compared to the bulk of the population. The needed head start is shown to be proportional to the inverse fitness of the mutant type, and only weakly dependent on the carrying capacity. The precise location dependence of surfing probabilities is derived from the non-extinction probability of a branching process within a moving field of growth rates. The second factor is the mutation occurrence which strongly decreases towards the tip of the wave. Thus, most successful mutations arise at an intermediate position in the front of the wave. We present an analytic theory for the tradeoff between these factors that allows to predict how frequently substitutions by beneficial mutations occur at invasion fronts. We find that small amounts of genetic drift increase the fixation rate of beneficial mutations at the advancing front, and thus could be important for adaptation during species invasions.

[1]  M. Kimura,et al.  The Stepping Stone Model of Population Structure and the Decrease of Genetic Correlation with Distance. , 1964, Genetics.

[2]  Gregory P. Brown,et al.  Invasion, stress, and spinal arthritis in cane toads , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  F. Schurr,et al.  Differentiation of reproductive and competitive ability in the invaded range of Senecio inaequidens: the role of genetic Allee effects, adaptive and nonadaptive evolution. , 2011, The New phytologist.

[4]  James D. Murray Mathematical Biology: I. An Introduction , 2007 .

[5]  Oskar Hallatschek,et al.  Gene surfing in expanding populations. , 2007, Theoretical population biology.

[6]  D. Nelson,et al.  Genetic drift at expanding frontiers promotes gene segregation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  K. Johst,et al.  Density-regulated population dynamics and conditional dispersal alter the fate of mutations occurring at the front of an expanding population , 2011, Heredity.

[8]  W. Ebeling Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1995 .

[9]  Christopher A. Edmonds,et al.  Mutations arising in the wave front of an expanding population. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Laurent Excoffier,et al.  Deep Human Genealogies Reveal a Selective Advantage to Be on an Expanding Wave Front , 2011, Science.

[11]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Genetic Consequences of Range Expansions , 2009 .

[12]  Seraina Klopfstein,et al.  The fate of mutations surfing on the wave of a range expansion. , 2006, Molecular biology and evolution.

[13]  Bernard Derrida,et al.  Shift in the velocity of a front due to a cutoff , 1997 .

[14]  D. Sherrington Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1983 .

[15]  Oskar Hallatschek,et al.  LIFE AT THE FRONT OF AN EXPANDING POPULATION , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[16]  Mandy J. Haldane,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Natural and Artificial Selection, Part V: Selection and Mutation , 1927, Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[17]  N. Rashevsky,et al.  Mathematical biology , 1961, Connecticut medicine.

[18]  N. Kampen,et al.  Stochastic processes in physics and chemistry , 1981 .

[19]  T. E. Harris,et al.  The Theory of Branching Processes. , 1963 .

[20]  Justin M. J. Travis,et al.  Landscape structure and boundary effects determine the fate of mutations occurring during range expansions , 2008, Heredity.

[21]  W. Allee Co-Operation Among Animals , 1931, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  Gregory P. Brown,et al.  An evolutionary process that assembles phenotypes through space rather than through time , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  L. Excoffier,et al.  Surfing during population expansions promotes genetic revolutions and structuration. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[24]  R. Fisher THE WAVE OF ADVANCE OF ADVANTAGEOUS GENES , 1937 .

[25]  P. Sniegowski,et al.  Beneficial mutations and the dynamics of adaptation in asexual populations , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[26]  Oskar Hallatschek,et al.  The noisy edge of traveling waves , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Judith R. Miller Survival of mutations arising during invasions , 2010, Evolutionary applications.

[28]  Karin Johst,et al.  Deleterious mutations can surf to high densities on the wave front of an expanding population. , 2007, Molecular biology and evolution.

[29]  M. Menegon,et al.  Gradual Adaptation Toward a Range-Expansion Phenotype Initiated the Global Radiation of Toads , 2010, Science.