A new swift algorithm for bi-objective optimum design of steel moment frames

Abstract In this paper, a new algorithm is proposed to multi-objective optimum seismic design of steel moment frames. This algorithm is based on the uniform damage (also known as uniform deformation) theory and so-called multi-objective uniform damage optimization (MUDO). MUDO is a swift algorithm formulated according to a bi-objective approach. Structural weight and maximum interstory drift ratio (IDR) are treated as two conflicting objectives representing economy and safety measures, respectively, and they are minimized simultaneously subject to a set of design constraints. To achieve the optimal Pareto front , MUDO tries to create a uniform distribution of story drifts in the structure and bring it to a target value that gradually varies from the low (minimum damage) to high (maximum damage). In this way, the algorithm obtains a set of optimal solutions in terms of structural weight at different damage levels, which is the Pareto front. To demonstrate the efficiency and robustness of the proposed algorithm, its results for 3-, 6- and 9-story steel moment frames are compared with those of two well-known multi-objective optimization algorithms, NSGA-II and MOPSO. Results indicate that MUDO can achieve better optimal solutions set in a much less computational time than the other two methods.

[1]  null null,et al.  Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures , 2017 .

[2]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Constraint-handling in nature-inspired numerical optimization: Past, present and future , 2011, Swarm Evol. Comput..

[3]  Yuantao Sun,et al.  An efficient discrete optimization algorithm for performance-based design optimization of steel frames , 2020, Advances in Structural Engineering.

[4]  Jasbir S. Arora,et al.  Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering , 2004 .

[5]  Anurag Rai,et al.  MOEPO: A novel Multi-objective Emperor Penguin Optimizer for global optimization: Special application in ranking of cloud service providers , 2020, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell..

[6]  R. Karami Mohammadi,et al.  Performance-based design optimization using uniform deformation theory: a comparison study , 2015 .

[7]  S. Talatahari,et al.  Seismic energy-based design of BRB frames using multi-objective vibrating particles system optimization , 2020 .

[8]  Iman Hajirasouliha,et al.  Practical method for optimal rehabilitation of steel frame buildings using buckling restrained brace dampers , 2019, Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering.

[9]  Ali Kaveh,et al.  Life-cycle cost optimization of steel moment-frame structures: performance-based seismic design approach , 2014 .

[10]  A. Shamsai,et al.  Multi-objective Optimization , 2017, Encyclopedia of Machine Learning and Data Mining.

[11]  Aisc.  Steel Construction Manual , 2017 .

[12]  Saeed Gholizadeh,et al.  Multi-objective design optimization of steel moment frames considering seismic collapse safety , 2019, Engineering with Computers.

[13]  Graham H. Powell,et al.  Seismic damage prediction by deterministic methods: Concepts and procedures , 1988 .

[14]  M. Mousazadeh,et al.  An efficient approach for LCC-based optimum design of lead-rubber base isolation system via FFD and analysis of variance (ANOVA) , 2019, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[15]  Atulya K. Nagar,et al.  MOSOA: A new multi-objective seagull optimization algorithm , 2020, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  Amir Hossein Sharghi,et al.  On the optimum performance-based design of eccentrically braced frames , 2014 .

[17]  Saeed Gholizadeh,et al.  Multi-objective seismic design optimization of steel frames by a chaotic meta-heuristic algorithm , 2017, Engineering with Computers.

[18]  Ali Kaveh,et al.  Optimum design of steel frame structures considering construction cost and seismic damage , 2015 .

[19]  Soheyl Khalilpourazari,et al.  Multi-Objective Stochastic Fractal Search: a powerful algorithm for solving complex multi-objective optimization problems , 2019, Soft Computing.

[20]  Masoud Mirtaheri,et al.  Comparison between uniform deformation method and Genetic Algorithmfor optimizing mechanical properties of dampers , 2018 .

[21]  Haitao Liu,et al.  Multi-objective metaheuristics for discrete optimization problems: A review of the state-of-the-art , 2020, Appl. Soft Comput..

[22]  Refail Kasimbeyli,et al.  Comparison of Some Scalarization Methods in Multiobjective Optimization , 2017 .

[23]  Vijay Kumar,et al.  Multi-objective spotted hyena optimizer: A Multi-objective optimization algorithm for engineering problems , 2018, Knowl. Based Syst..

[24]  Seyedali Mirjalili,et al.  Dragonfly algorithm: a new meta-heuristic optimization technique for solving single-objective, discrete, and multi-objective problems , 2015, Neural Computing and Applications.

[25]  Leandro dos Santos Coelho,et al.  Multi-objective grey wolf optimizer: A novel algorithm for multi-criterion optimization , 2016, Expert Syst. Appl..

[26]  Saeed Gholizadeh,et al.  A new Newton metaheuristic algorithm for discrete performance-based design optimization of steel moment frames , 2020 .

[27]  Tansel Dökeroglu,et al.  A survey on new generation metaheuristic algorithms , 2019, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[28]  R. Karami Mohammadi,et al.  Optimum strength distribution for seismic resistant shear buildings , 2004 .

[29]  S. O. Degertekin,et al.  School-based optimization for performance-based optimum seismic design of steel frames , 2020, Engineering with Computers.

[30]  Ali Kaveh,et al.  Seismic design of steel frames using multi-objective optimization , 2013 .

[31]  Kypros Pilakoutas,et al.  Effects of uncertainties on seismic behaviour of optimum designed braced steel frames , 2016 .

[32]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Constraint-handling techniques used with evolutionary algorithms , 2017, GECCO.

[33]  Benjamín Barán,et al.  Performance metrics in multi-objective optimization , 2015, 2015 Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI).

[34]  Carlos A. Coello Coello,et al.  Handling multiple objectives with particle swarm optimization , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation.

[35]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II , 2002, IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput..

[36]  Mohammad Reza Banan,et al.  An improved multi-objective optimization approach for performance-based design of structures using nonlinear time-history analyses , 2018, Appl. Soft Comput..

[37]  Shahram Pezeshk,et al.  Probabilistic Seismic Loss Analysis for the Design of Steel Structures: Optimizing for Multiple-Objective Functions , 2016 .

[38]  Iman Hajirasouliha,et al.  A practical methodology for optimum seismic design of RC frames for minimum damage and life-cycle cost , 2020 .

[39]  N. Null.  Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings , 2014 .

[40]  Jean Bigeon,et al.  Performance indicators in multiobjective optimization , 2018, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[41]  Lothar Thiele,et al.  Comparison of Multiobjective Evolutionary Algorithms: Empirical Results , 2000, Evolutionary Computation.

[42]  Pradeep Jangir,et al.  Multi-objective ant lion optimizer: a multi-objective optimization algorithm for solving engineering problems , 2016, Applied Intelligence.

[43]  Nurettin Cetinkaya,et al.  A new meta-heuristic optimizer: Pathfinder algorithm , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[44]  Gary B. Lamont,et al.  Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems , 2002, Genetic Algorithms and Evolutionary Computation.

[45]  H Moghaddam,et al.  A NEW APPROACH FOR OPTIMUM DESIGN OF STRUCTURES UNDER DYNAMIC EXCIATION , 2004 .

[46]  Homayoon E. Estekanchi,et al.  Application of endurance time method in performance-based optimum design of structures , 2015 .

[47]  Guohui Huang,et al.  Performance-based multi-objective collaborative optimization of steel frames with fuse-oriented buckling-restrained braces , 2020, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization.

[48]  Jinping Ou,et al.  Seismic optimization design for uniform damage of reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames using consecutive modal pushover analysis , 2016 .

[49]  Ronald O. Hamburger,et al.  Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications, ANSI/AISC 358-05 , 2006 .

[50]  A. R. Vosoughi,et al.  A mixed GA-PSO-based approach for performance-based design optimization of 2D reinforced concrete special moment-resisting frames , 2019, Appl. Soft Comput..

[51]  Kamal Taha,et al.  Methods That Optimize Multi-Objective Problems: A Survey and Experimental Evaluation , 2020, IEEE Access.

[52]  Manolis Papadrakakis,et al.  Optimum performance based design of structures , 2006 .

[53]  Kalyanmoy Deb,et al.  Investigating the equivalence between PBI and AASF scalarization for multi-objective optimization , 2020, Swarm Evol. Comput..