Using data envelopment analysis to evaluate environmentally conscious waste treatment technology

Abstract As environmental issues become increasingly important for organizational operations, the roles of organizational practices and technology in improving environmental performance increase. Some of these new practices and technologies are difficult to evaluate using traditional approaches. In this paper we analyze a decision making case study concerning the investment and adoption of environmentally conscious waste treatment technology in a government supported agency. Data envelopment analysis, and some of its extensions, will be used to evaluate the technologies. The results show that this tool could be useful in evaluating these technologies. Managerial insights on the use of these models, including caveats on the use of DEA, are also presented.

[1]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Evaluating environmentally conscious business practices , 1998, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Markku Kuula,et al.  Selecting a flexible manufacturing system using multiple criteria analysis , 1991 .

[3]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[4]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[5]  Paul R. Kleindorfer,et al.  Integrating manufacturing strategy and technology choice , 1990 .

[6]  Srikanth Padmanabhan,et al.  A tandem expert support system as justification for a flexible manufacturing system , 1989 .

[7]  Denis Borenstein.  IDSSFLEX: an intelligent DSS for the design and evaluation of flexible manufacturing systems , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[8]  Nallan C. Suresh,et al.  An extended multi-objective replacement model for flexible automation investments , 1991 .

[9]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses , 1994 .

[10]  Kaoru Tone,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis , 1996 .

[11]  Craig A. Nelson,et al.  A scoring model for flexible manufacturing systems project selection , 1986 .

[12]  Joseph Sarkis.  EVALUATING FLEXIBLE MANUFACTURING SYSTEMS ALTERNATIVES USING DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS , 1997 .

[13]  David L. Olson,et al.  Decision Aids for Selection Problems , 1995 .

[14]  Upendra Dave,et al.  Economic and Multiattribute Evaluation of Advanced Manufacturing Systems , 1988 .

[15]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[16]  Hamid R. Parsaei,et al.  Application of outranking methods to economic and financial justification of CIM systems , 1993 .

[17]  P. C. Pandey,et al.  Selection of an automated inspection system using multiattribute decision analysis , 1995 .

[18]  Peter L. Primrose,et al.  Investment in Manufacturing Technology , 1992 .

[19]  John S. Chandler.  A Multiple Criteria Approach for Evaluating Information Systems , 1982, MIS Q..

[20]  J. William Semich.  Here's how to quantify IT investment benefits , 1994 .

[21]  Muhittin Oral,et al.  A methodology for collective evaluation and selection of industrial R&D projects , 1991 .

[22]  A. Charnes,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis Theory, Methodology and Applications , 1995 .

[23]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[24]  Nallan C. Suresh,et al.  Justifying multimachine systems: An integrated strategic approach , 1985 .

[25]  Moutaz Khouja,et al.  The use of data envelopment analysis for technology selection , 1995 .

[26]  J. Colin Glass,et al.  A Cost Indirect Evaluation of Productivity Change in UK Universities , 1998 .

[27]  Russell G. Thompson,et al.  The role of multiplier bounds in efficiency analysis with application to Kansas farming , 1990 .

[28]  R. Sundarraj,et al.  Factors for strategic evaluation of enterprise information technologies , 2000 .

[29]  Richard H. Silkman,et al.  Measuring efficiency : an assessment of data envelopment analysis , 1986 .

[30]  Robert G. Dyson,et al.  Efficiency, size, benchmarks and targets for bank branches: an application of data envelopment analysis , 1999, J. Oper. Res. Soc..