All over the map: An interobserver agreement study of tumor location based on the PI‐RADSv2 sector map

Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI‐RADSv2) recommends a sector map for reporting findings of prostate cancer mulitparametric MRI (mpMRI). Anecdotally, radiologists may demonstrate inconsistent reproducibility with this map.

[1]  A. Rosenkrantz,et al.  3.0 T multiparametric prostate MRI using pelvic phased-array coil: utility for tumor detection prior to biopsy. , 2013, Urologic oncology.

[2]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2015, JAMA.

[3]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Accuracy and agreement of PIRADSv2 for prostate cancer mpMRI: A multireader study , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Pierre Mozer,et al.  Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review. , 2015, European urology.

[5]  Laurent Lemaitre,et al.  Current status of MRI for the diagnosis, staging and prognosis of prostate cancer: implications for focal therapy and active surveillance , 2009, Current opinion in urology.

[6]  Adam T Froemming,et al.  Interobserver Reproducibility of the PI-RADS Version 2 Lexicon: A Multicenter Study of Six Experienced Prostate Radiologists. , 2016, Radiology.

[7]  J. McNeal.  The zonal anatomy of the prostate , 1981, The Prostate.

[8]  J. Fütterer,et al.  Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature. , 2015, European urology.

[9]  U. Nagele,et al.  Evaluation of the ‘Prostate Interdisciplinary Communication and Mapping Algorithm for Biopsy and Pathology’ (PIC-MABP) , 2016, World Journal of Urology.

[10]  B. Carey,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. , 2011, European urology.

[11]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Recent advances in image-guided targeted prostate biopsy , 2015, Abdominal Imaging.

[12]  Erhard Godehardt,et al.  Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies. , 2015, European urology.

[13]  P. Choyke,et al.  A method for correlating in vivo prostate magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology using individualized magnetic resonance-based molds. , 2009, The Review of scientific instruments.

[14]  J. Camp,et al.  Shape analysis of the prostate: establishing imaging specifications for the design of a transurethral imaging device for prostate brachytherapy guidance. , 2014, Brachytherapy.

[15]  J. McNeal,et al.  The zonal anatomy of the prostate , 1981, The Prostate.

[16]  W. Catalona,et al.  Diagnostic Value of Guided Biopsies: Fusion and Cognitive-registration Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Conventional Ultrasound Biopsy of the Prostate. , 2016, Urology.

[17]  Toshimasa J Clark,et al.  Accuracy and Interobserver Variability in Reporting of PI-RADS Version 2. , 2017, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[18]  M. Harisinghani,et al.  A practical primer on PI-RADS version 2: a pictorial essay , 2016, Abdominal Radiology.