Longitudinal, cross-site and "in the Wild": a study of public displays user communities' situated snapshots

Networked public displays are a new medium, and as such they can improve the quality and experience of urban spaces by providing new means to engage members of place-based communities. As they are located in different public spaces understanding commonalities and differences between their users helps in building a solid foundation for knowledge on how networked public displays operate. In this paper, we describe findings from a 12 weeks deployment of the Moment Machine application that allows posting and viewing situated snapshots across 4 displays placed in urban settings of the Screens in the Wild Network (UK). We describe similarities/differences between the four user communities in terms of the photos taken, returning users behavior, interaction session properties etc. Overall, our findings contribute to the buildup of knowledge on general engagement patterns of networked public displays. We suggest that situated snapshots and their analysis as described in this paper can be used as a research tool and methodology for capturing and uncovering the part of a place-based community interested in interacting with public displays.

[1]  DaviesNigel,et al.  Public Ubiquitous Computing Systems , 2006 .

[2]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  It's Mine, Don't Touch!: interactions at a large multi-touch display in a city centre , 2008, CHI.

[3]  Marko Jurmu,et al.  UBI-Hotspot 1.0: Large-Scale Long-Term Deployment of Interactive Public Displays in a City Center , 2010, 2010 Fifth International Conference on Internet and Web Applications and Services.

[4]  Jonathan Arnowitz,et al.  It's mine... , 2005, INTR.

[5]  Anthony Tang,et al.  Lessons learned: game design for large public displays , 2008, DIMEA.

[6]  Elizabeth F. Churchill,et al.  Multimedia fliers: information sharing with digital community bulletin boards , 2003 .

[7]  Ava Fatah gen. Schieck,et al.  Networked architectural interfaces: exploring the effect of spatial configuration on urban screen placement , 2013 .

[8]  Angelika Mueller,et al.  The Great Good Place , 2016 .

[9]  Nemanja Memarovic,et al.  Community is the message: viewing networked public displays through McLuhan's lens of figure and ground , 2014, MAB '14.

[10]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  Tethered or free to roam: the design space of limiting content access on community displays , 2013, PerDis '13.

[11]  Paul Marshall,et al.  Exploring the effects of space and place on engagement with an interactive installation , 2013, CHI.

[12]  Nemanja Memarovic,et al.  Understanding future challenges for networked public display systems in community settings , 2015, C&T.

[13]  Konrad Tollmar,et al.  Communiplay: a field study of a public display mediaspace , 2014, CHI.

[14]  Ava Fatah gen. Schieck,et al.  Tension Space Analysis: Exploring Community Requirements for Networked Urban Screens , 2013, INTERACT.

[15]  Ronald Schroeter,et al.  Engaging new digital locals with interactive urban screens to collaboratively improve the city , 2012, CSCW.

[16]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Rethinking 'multi-user': an in-the-wild study of how groups approach a walk-up-and-use tabletop interface , 2011, CHI.

[17]  Andrew Vande Moere,et al.  OpenWindow: citizen-controlled content on public displays , 2013, PerDis '13.

[18]  Ava Fatah gen. Schieck,et al.  Exploring the effect of spatial layout on mediated urban interactions , 2013, PerDis.

[19]  Nemanja Memarovic,et al.  Moment Machine: Opportunities and Challenges of Posting Situated Snapshots onto Networked Public Displays , 2013, INTERACT.

[20]  Marko Jurmu,et al.  From School Food to Skate Parks in a Few Clicks: Using Public Displays to Bootstrap Civic Engagement of the Young , 2012, Pervasive.

[21]  Nemanja Memarovic,et al.  Capture the Moment: "In the Wild" Longitudinal Case Study of Situated Snapshots Captured Through an Urban Screen in a Community Setting , 2015, CSCW.

[22]  C Mottram,et al.  The urban screen as a socialising platform: exploring the role of place within the urban space , 2008 .

[23]  Jennifer G. Sheridan,et al.  Public Ubiquitous Computing Systems: Lessons from the e-Campus Display Deployments , 2006, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[24]  Andrew Clark,et al.  Understanding Community: A review of networks, ties and contacts , 2007 .

[25]  Shelly Farnham,et al.  Supporting community in third places with situated social software , 2009, C&T.

[26]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  Social interaction around a rural community photo display , 2009, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[27]  Rui José,et al.  Pins and posters: Paradigms for content publication on situated displays , 2013, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[28]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Life through the lens: a qualitative investigation of human behaviour with an urban photography service , 2015, BCS HCI.

[29]  Keith Cheverst,et al.  P-LAYERS -- A Layered Framework Addressing the Multifaceted Issues Facing Community-Supporting Public Display Deployments , 2013, TCHI.

[30]  Jukka Riekki,et al.  Crowdsourcing Public Opinion Using Urban Pervasive Technologies: Lessons From Real‐Life Experiments in Oulu , 2015 .

[31]  Timo Ojala,et al.  Public Displays Invade Urban Spaces , 2013, IEEE Pervasive Computing.

[32]  Carman Neustaedter,et al.  Posting for community and culture: considerations for the design of interactive digital bulletin boards , 2014, CHI.