On descriptive and interpretive abilities of arterial system models

Two models of the systemic arterial circulation, the asymmetric T-tube and a 6-element model, were evaluated on descriptive and interpretive criteria. With aortic flow as input, model parameters were optimized to predict aortic pressure for two experimental conditions: control and after balloon inflation in the external iliac artery. The models predict pressure with equally high accuracy. However, changes in T-tube model parameters following inflation were physiologically consistent but the 6-element model parameters were wildly variable and inconsistent. We conclude that descriptive abilities of the models are comparable but interpretive abilities of the T-tube model exceed those of the 6-element one.

[1]  J. Cohn,et al.  First- and third-order models for determining arterial compliance. , 1992, Journal of hypertension. Supplement : official journal of the International Society of Hypertension.

[2]  Abraham Noordergraaf,et al.  Reduced Models of Arterial Systems , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  S. Shroff,et al.  Physiological relevance of T-tube model parameters with emphasis on arterial compliances. , 1995, The American journal of physiology.

[4]  A Noordergraaf,et al.  Analog studies of the human systemic arterial tree. , 1969, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  R. Burattini,et al.  Modified asymmetric T-tube model to infer arterial wave reflection at the aortic root , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.