Multicentre, randomised, open-label, parallel-group study evaluating the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab versus adalimumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis naïve to biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug: final results by week 52

Objectives SPIRIT head-to-head (H2H) is a 52-week (Wk) trial comparing ixekizumab (IXE) with adalimumab (ADA) for simultaneous American College of Rheumatology (ACR)50 and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)100 responses in 566 patients (distributed evenly across both groups) with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). IXE was superior to ADA for this primary end point at Wk24. We aimed to determine the final efficacy and safety results through Wk52 including a prespecified subgroup analysis of concomitant conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARD) use. Methods SPIRIT-H2H is a Wk52 multicentre, open-label, blinded-assessor study comparing IXE and ADA in bionaïve patients with PsA. Patients were randomised 1:1 to IXE or ADA with stratification by concomitant csDMARD use and presence of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Prespecified end points at Wk24 and Wk52 included musculoskeletal, psoriasis, quality-of life outcomes, subgroup analyses and safety. Results A significantly higher proportion of patients treated with IXE versus ADA simultaneously achieved ACR50 and PASI100 (39% vs 26%, p<0.001), PASI100 (64% vs 41%, p<0.001) at Wk52. Efficacy of IXE and ADA was similar at Wk52 for ACR50 (49.8% vs 49.8%, p=0.924), treat-to-target outcomes, enthesitis and dactylitis resolution. Responses to IXE were consistent irrespective of concomitant csDMARD use. Significantly more patients on IXE monotherapy versus ADA monotherapy had simultaneous ACR50 and PASI100 (38% vs 19%, p=0.007), and PASI100 responses (66% vs 35%, p<0.001) at Wk52. There were no new safety findings for IXE or ADA. Conclusions IXE provided significantly greater simultaneous joint and skin improvement than ADA through Wk52 in bionaïve patients with PsA. IXE showed better efficacy on psoriasis and performed at least as well as ADA on musculoskeletal manifestations. IXE efficacy was consistent irrespective of concomitant csDMARD use. Trial registration number NCT03151551.

[1]  A. Gottlieb,et al.  Secukinumab versus adalimumab for treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (EXCEED): a double-blind, parallel-group, randomised, active-controlled, phase 3b trial , 2020, The Lancet.

[2]  P. Emery,et al.  A head-to-head comparison of the efficacy and safety of ixekizumab and adalimumab in biological-naïve patients with active psoriatic arthritis: 24-week results of a randomised, open-label, blinded-assessor trial , 2019, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[3]  A. Gottlieb,et al.  American College of Rheumatology / National Psoriasis Foundation Guideline for the Treatment of Psoriatic Arthritis , 2018 .

[4]  D. M. van der Heijde,et al.  Tofacitinib or Adalimumab versus Placebo for Psoriatic Arthritis , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  U. Wagner,et al.  Ixekizumab for the treatment of patients with active psoriatic arthritis and an inadequate response to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled period of the SPIRIT-P2 phase 3 trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[6]  D. Gladman,et al.  Ixekizumab, an interleukin-17A specific monoclonal antibody, for the treatment of biologic-naive patients with active psoriatic arthritis: results from the 24-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled and active (adalimumab)-controlled period of the phase III trial SPIRIT-P1 , 2016, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[7]  A. Gottlieb,et al.  Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis 2015 Treatment Recommendations for Psoriatic Arthritis , 2016, Arthritis & rheumatology.

[8]  M Cutolo,et al.  European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations for the management of psoriatic arthritis with pharmacological therapies: 2015 update , 2015, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[9]  A. Mendelsohn,et al.  The burden of psoriatic arthritis: a literature review from a global health systems perspective. , 2010, P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management.

[10]  D. Gladman,et al.  Golimumab, a new human tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody, administered every four weeks as a subcutaneous injection in psoriatic arthritis: Twenty-four-week efficacy and safety results of a randomized, placebo-controlled study. , 2009, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[11]  D. Gladman,et al.  The Infliximab Multinational Psoriatic Arthritis Controlled Trial (IMPACT): results of radiographic analyses after 1 year , 2006, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[12]  D. Gladman,et al.  Adalimumab for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active psoriatic arthritis: results of a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. , 2005, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  D. Gladman,et al.  Psoriatic arthritis: epidemiology, clinical features, course, and outcome , 2005, Annals of the rheumatic diseases.

[14]  J. Sharp,et al.  Etanercept treatment of psoriatic arthritis: safety, efficacy, and effect on disease progression. , 2004, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[15]  P. Mease,et al.  Etanercept in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis and psoriasis: a randomised trial , 2000, The Lancet.