Evolution of specialization in a spatially continuous environment

We study the evolution of specialization in a spatially continuous (one‐dimensional) environment divided into two habitats; we use a general trade‐off function relating fitnesses in the two habitats and illustrate our results with two classical trade‐off functions. We show that the population can either reach an intermediate value of the trait and be moderately adapted to both habitats (1 generalist), or split into two locally adapted subpopulations (2 specialists). We recover the qualitative results obtained with simpler metapopulation models with island migration: the evolutionary outcome depends on the concavity of the trade‐off, on the proportion of each habitat and on migration. Our quantitative prediction on migration, however, depends on isolation by distance. Our spatially explicit model may thus be particularly useful to describe the evolutionary dynamics of specialization in, perhaps, more realistic ecological scenarios.

[1]  George W. Tyler,et al.  The Evolution of Species , 1871, The British and foreign medico-chirurgical review.

[2]  H. Levene,et al.  Genetic Equilibrium When More Than One Ecological Niche is Available , 1953, The American Naturalist.

[3]  E. Dempster.  Maintenance of genetic heterogeneity. , 1955, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[4]  R. Levins.  Theory of Fitness in a Heterogeneous Environment. I. The Fitness Set and Adaptive Function , 1962, The American Naturalist.

[5]  R. Levins.  Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations. (MPB-2) , 1968 .

[6]  J. M. Smith,et al.  The Logic of Animal Conflict , 1973, Nature.

[7]  T. Nagylaki,et al.  Conditions for the existence of clines. , 1975, Genetics.

[8]  F. B. Christiansen.  Hard and Soft Selection in a Subdivided Population , 1975, The American Naturalist.

[9]  M. Slatkin,et al.  Niche Width in a Fluctuating Environment-Density Independent Model , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[10]  T. Nagylaki,et al.  Clines with asymmetric migration. , 1978, Genetics.

[11]  P. Chesson,et al.  Environmental Variability Promotes Coexistence in Lottery Competitive Systems , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[12]  Jonathan Roughgarden,et al.  Spatial heterogeneity and interspecific competition , 1982 .

[13]  C. Stringer,et al.  Evolution of a species , 1985 .

[14]  H. Berg.  Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology.: Vol. LII. Evolution of Catalytic Functions. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1987, ISBN 0-87969-054-2, xix + 955 pp., US $150.00. , 1989 .

[15]  R. Lande,et al.  A Model of Population Growth, Dispersal and Evolution in a Changing Environment , 1989 .

[16]  J. Hofbauer,et al.  Adaptive dynamics and evolutionary stability , 1990 .

[17]  F. B. Christiansen.  On Conditions for Evolutionary Stability for a Continuously Varying Character , 1991, The American Naturalist.

[18]  David Sloan Wilson,et al.  On the Coexistence of Specialists and Generalists , 1994, The American Naturalist.

[19]  P D Taylor,et al.  Inclusive fitness arguments in genetic models of behaviour , 1996, Journal of mathematical biology.

[20]  G. Hess.  Disease in Metapopulation Models: Implications for Conservation , 1996 .

[21]  GENERALISTS, SPECIALISTS, AND THE EVOLUTION OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY IN SYMPATRIC POPULATIONS OF DISTINCT SPECIES. , 1997, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[22]  M. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Evolution of a Species' Range , 1997, The American Naturalist.

[23]  Ph. Van.  GENERALISTS, SPECIALISTS, AND THE EVOLUTION OF PHENOTYPIC PLASTICITY IN SYMPATRIC POPULATIONS OF DISTINCT SPECIES. , 1997 .

[24]  Géza Meszéna,et al.  Adaptive Dynamics in a 2-patch Environment: a Simple Model for Allopatric and Parapatric Speciation , 1997 .

[25]  I. Hanski.  Metapopulation dynamics , 1998, Nature.

[26]  DENSITY DEPENDENCE AND UNPREDICTABLE SELECTION IN A HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENT: COMPROMISE AND POLYMORPHISM IN THE ESS REACTION NORM , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[27]  É. Kisdi,et al.  ADAPTIVE DYNAMICS IN ALLELE SPACE: EVOLUTION OF GENETIC POLYMORPHISM BY SMALL MUTATIONS IN A HETEROGENEOUS ENVIRONMENT , 1999, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[28]  R. Gomulkiewicz,et al.  COEVOLUTIONARY CLINES ACROSS SELECTION MOSAICS , 2000, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[29]  M. Taper,et al.  Interspecific Competition, Environmental Gradients, Gene Flow, and the Coevolution of Species' Borders , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[30]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Evolutionary Branching and Sympatric Speciation Caused by Different Types of Ecological Interactions , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[31]  T. Day.  Competition and the Effect of Spatial Resource Heterogeneity on Evolutionary Diversification , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[32]  WHEN SOURCES BECOME SINKS: MIGRATIONAL MELTDOWN IN HETEROGENEOUS HABITATS , 2001, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[33]  É. Kisdi.  Long-term adaptive diversity in Levene-type models , 2001 .

[34]  Lauren Ancel Meyers,et al.  Fighting change with change: adaptive variation in an uncertain world , 2002 .

[35]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Speciation along environmental gradients , 2003, Nature.

[36]  Géza Meszéna,et al.  Spatial niche packing, character displacement and adaptive speciation along an environmental gradient , 2003 .

[37]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Trade‐Off Geometries and Frequency‐Dependent Selection , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[38]  T. Kawecki,et al.  The Maintenance (or Not) of Polygenic Variation by Soft Selection in Heterogeneous Environments , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[39]  Martijn Egas,et al.  Evolution Restricts the Coexistence of Specialists and Generalists: The Role of Trade‐off Structure , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[40]  M. Egas,et al.  Dispersal and the evolution of specialisation in a two-habitat type metapopulation. , 2004, Theoretical population biology.

[41]  É. Kisdi,et al.  Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree , 2004, Evolutionary Ecology.

[42]  Y. Michalakis,et al.  Polymorphism in heterogeneous environments, evolution of habitat selection and sympatric speciation: Soft and hard selection models , 1993, Evolutionary Ecology.

[43]  Joel s. Brown,et al.  Evolution in heterogeneous environments: Effects of migration on habitat specialization , 1992, Evolutionary Ecology.

[44]  P. Abrams.  ADAPTIVE CHANGE IN THE RESOURCE‐EXPLOITATION TRAITS OF A GENERALIST CONSUMER: THE EVOLUTION AND COEXISTENCE OF GENERALISTS AND SPECIALISTS , 2006, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[45]  Martijn Egas,et al.  Evolutionary Predictions Should Be Based on Individual‐Level Traits , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[46]  Peter A Abrams,et al.  The Prerequisites for and Likelihood of Generalist‐Specialist Coexistence , 2006, The American Naturalist.

[47]  O. Leimar,et al.  Evolution of Phenotypic Clusters Through Competition and Local Adaptation Along an Environmental Gradient , 2008, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[48]  K. Parvinen,et al.  On the evolution of specialization with a mechanistic underpinning in structured metapopulations. , 2008, Theoretical population biology.

[49]  Florence Debarre,et al.  Evolutionary Epidemiology of Drug-Resistance in Space , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[50]  Ulf Dieckmann,et al.  Live Where You Thrive: Joint Evolution of Habitat Choice and Local Adaptation Facilitates Specialization and Promotes Diversity , 2009, The American Naturalist.