A Method for Biomolecular Structural Recognition and Docking Allowing Conformational Flexibility

In this work, we present an algorithm developed to handle biomolecular structural recognition problems, as part of an interdisciplinary research endeavor of the Computer Vision and Molecular Biology fields. A key problem in rational drug design and in biomolecular structural recognition is the generation of binding modes between two molecules, also known as molecular docking. Geometrical fitness is a necessary condition for molecular interaction. Hence, docking a ligand (e.g., a drug molecule or a protein molecule), to a protein receptor (e.g., enzyme), involves recognition of molecular surfaces. Conformational transitions by "hinge-bending" involves rotational movements of relatively rigid parts with respect to each other. The generation of docked binding modes between two associating molecules depends on their three dimensional structures (3-D) and their conformational flexibility. In comparison to the particular case of rigid-body docking, the computational difficulty grows considerably when taking into account the additional degrees of freedom intrinsic to the flexible molecular docking problem. Previous docking techniques have enabled hinge movements only within small ligands. Partial flexibility in the receptor molecule is enabled by a few techniques. Hinge-bending motions of protein receptors domains are not addressed by these methods, although these types of transitions are significant, e.g., in enzymes activity. Our approach allows hinge induced motions to exist in either the receptor or the ligand molecules of diverse sizes. We allow domains/subdomains/group of atoms movements in either of the associating molecules. We achieve this by adapting a technique developed in Computer Vision and Robotics for the efficient recognition of partially occluded articulated objects. These types of objects consist of rigid parts which are connected by rotary joints (hinges). Our method is based on an extension and generalization of the Hough transform and the Geometric Hashing paradigms for rigid object recognition. We show experimental results obtained by the successful application of the algorithm to cases of bound and unbound molecular complexes, yielding fast matching times. While the "correct" molecular conformations of the known complexes are obtained with small RMS distances, additional, predictive good-fitting binding modes are generated as well. We conclude by discussing the algorithm's implications and extensions, as well as its application to investigations of protein structures in Molecular Biology and recognition problems in Computer Vision.

[1]  EDWIN C. Webb The Enzymes , 1961, Nature.

[2]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1977, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  F M Richards,et al.  Areas, volumes, packing and protein structure. , 1977, Annual review of biophysics and bioengineering.

[4]  G J Williams,et al.  The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. , 1978, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[5]  F. Allen,et al.  The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre: computer-based search, retrieval, analysis and display of information , 1979 .

[6]  Dana H. Ballard,et al.  Generalizing the Hough transform to detect arbitrary shapes , 1981, Pattern Recognit..

[7]  M. Rossmann,et al.  Structure of the active ternary complex of pig heart lactate dehydrogenase with S-lac-NAD at 2.7 A resolution. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  J M Blaney,et al.  A geometric approach to macromolecule-ligand interactions. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  J. Bolin,et al.  Crystal structures of Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus casei dihydrofolate reductase refined at 1.7 A resolution. I. General features and binding of methotrexate. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[10]  M. L. Connolly Analytical molecular surface calculation , 1983 .

[11]  M. L. Connolly Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids. , 1983, Science.

[12]  A. Ghose,et al.  Geometrically feasible binding modes of a flexible ligand molecule at the receptor site , 1985 .

[13]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Docking flexible ligands to macromolecular receptors by molecular shape. , 1986, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[14]  Yehezkel Lamdan,et al.  Affine invariant model-based object recognition , 1990, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[15]  D. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking of substrates to proteins by simulated annealing , 1990, Proteins.

[16]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Structure-based design of nonpeptide inhibitors specific for the human immunodeficiency virus 1 protease. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  F. Quiocho,et al.  The 2.3-A resolution structure of the maltose- or maltodextrin-binding protein, a primary receptor of bacterial active transport and chemotaxis. , 1992, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[18]  Y. Martin Computer-assisted rational drug design. , 1991, Methods in enzymology.

[19]  Huajun Wang Grid‐search molecular accessible surface algorithm for solving the protein docking problem , 1991 .

[20]  Haim J. Wolfson,et al.  Generalizing the generalized hough transform , 1991, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[21]  S. Kim,et al.  "Soft docking": matching of molecular surface cubes. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[22]  Haim J. Wolfson,et al.  Articulated object recognition, or: how to generalize the generalized Hough transform , 1991, Proceedings. 1991 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[23]  H. Wolfson,et al.  Efficient detection of three-dimensional structural motifs in biological macromolecules by computer vision techniques. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Andrew Smellie,et al.  Fast drug-receptor mapping by site-directed distances: a novel method of predicting new pharmacological leads , 1991, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[25]  F. Quiocho,et al.  The 2.3-A resolution structure of the maltose- or maltodextrin-binding protein, a primary receptor of bacterial active transport and chemotaxis. , 1992 .

[26]  I. Kuntz Structure-Based Strategies for Drug Design and Discovery , 1992, Science.

[27]  F. Quiocho,et al.  Crystallographic evidence of a large ligand-induced hinge-twist motion between the two domains of the maltodextrin binding protein involved in active transport and chemotaxis. , 1992, Biochemistry.

[28]  M. Murcko,et al.  Use of structural information in drug design , 1992, Current Biology.

[29]  E. Katchalski‐Katzir,et al.  Molecular surface recognition: determination of geometric fit between proteins and their ligands by correlation techniques. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  I. Kuntz,et al.  Conformational analysis of flexible ligands in macromolecular receptor sites , 1992 .

[31]  Y. Thériault,et al.  Solution structure of the cyclosporin A/cyclophilin complex by NMR , 1993, Nature.

[32]  J. Pandit,et al.  Three-dimensional structures of the periplasmic lysine/arginine/ornithine-binding protein with and without a ligand. , 1994, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[33]  M. Mizutani,et al.  Rational automatic search method for stable docking models of protein and ligand. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  Mark H. Overmars,et al.  Spheres, molecules, and hidden surface removal , 1994, SCG '94.

[35]  D Fischer,et al.  Molecular surface representations by sparse critical points , 1994, Proteins.

[36]  A. Leach,et al.  Ligand docking to proteins with discrete side-chain flexibility. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[37]  R. Glen,et al.  Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  R. Nussinov,et al.  A geometry-based suite of molecular docking processes. , 1995, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Kevin P. Clark,et al.  Flexible ligand docking without parameter adjustment across four ligand–receptor complexes , 1995, J. Comput. Chem..

[40]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  An automated computer vision and robotics-based technique for 3-D flexible biomolecular docking and matching , 1995, Comput. Appl. Biosci..

[41]  R. Nussinov,et al.  Molecular recognition via face center representation of a molecular surface. , 1996, Journal of Molecular Graphics.

[42]  A. N. Jain,et al.  Hammerhead: fast, fully automated docking of flexible ligands to protein binding sites. , 1996, Chemistry & biology.

[43]  Thomas Lengauer,et al.  A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[44]  Ruth Nussinov,et al.  Docking of Conformationally Flexible Proteins , 1996, CPM.

[45]  P Willett,et al.  Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. , 1997, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  R. Murray Molecular recognition. , 2009, Analytical Chemistry.