Refining a brief decision aid in stable CAD: cognitive interviews

BackgroundWe describe the results of cognitive interviews to refine the “Making Choices©” Decision Aid (DA) for shared decision-making (SDM) about stress testing in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD).MethodsWe conducted a systematic development process to design a DA consistent with International Patient Decision Aid Standards (IPDAS) focused on Alpha testing criteria. Cognitive interviews were conducted with ten stable CAD patients using the “think aloud” interview technique to assess the clarity, usefulness, and design of each page of the DA.ResultsParticipants identified three main messages: 1) patients have multiple options based on stress tests and they should be discussed with a physician, 2) take care of yourself, 3) the stress test is the gold standard for determining the severity of your heart disease. Revisions corrected the inaccurate assumption of item number three.ConclusionsCognitive interviews proved critical for engaging patients in the development process and highlighted the necessity of clear message development and use of design principles that make decision materials easy to read and easy to use. Cognitive interviews appear to contribute critical information from the patient perspective to the overall systematic development process for designing decision aids.

[1]  Roger Tourangeau,et al.  Cognition and Survey Research , 2000, Technometrics.

[2]  A. Coulter,et al.  Using a Systematic Development Process , 2012 .

[3]  R. Czaja Questionnaire Pretesting Comes of Age , 1998 .

[4]  R. Henry,et al.  Nurse-Led Group Visits Support Shared Decision Making in Stable Coronary Artery Disease , 2013, The Journal of cardiovascular nursing.

[5]  E. McColl Cognitive Interviewing. A Tool for Improving Questionnaire Design , 2006, Quality of Life Research.

[6]  D. Berman,et al.  Impact of optimal medical therapy with or without percutaneous coronary intervention on long-term cardiovascular end points in patients with stable coronary artery disease (from the COURAGE Trial). , 2009, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Shared decision-making in primary care: the neglected second half of the consultation. , 1999, The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners.

[8]  J. Bestall,et al.  The use of cognitive interviewing methodology in the design and testing of a screening tool for supportive and palliative care needs , 2009, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[9]  Megan Coylewright,et al.  Shared Decision Making in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: PCI Choice , 2012, PloS one.

[10]  R. Henry,et al.  Medical Decision Making Shared Decision Making Guidance Reminders in Practice ( SDM-GRIP ) , 2011 .

[11]  J. Drennan,et al.  Cognitive interviewing: verbal data in the design and pretesting of questionnaires. , 2003, Journal of advanced nursing.

[12]  Annett Wechsler,et al.  Cognitive Interviewing A Tool For Improving Questionnaire Design , 2016 .

[13]  E. DeLong,et al.  Impact of an interactive video on decision making of patients with ischemic heart disease , 1996, Journal of General Internal Medicine.

[14]  F. J. Fowler,et al.  The use of cognitive testing to develop and evaluate CAHPS 1.0 core survey items. Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study. , 1999, Medical care.

[15]  D. Berman,et al.  Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  Stanley E. Kaufman,et al.  Effect of PCI on quality of life in patients with stable coronary disease. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  R. Thomson,et al.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. , 2003, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[18]  F. J. Fowler,et al.  Role of cognitive testing in the development of the CAHPS Hospital Survey. , 2005, Health services research.

[19]  M. Starling,et al.  A randomized controlled trial of information‐giving to patients referred for coronary angiography: effects on outcomes of care , 1998, Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy.

[20]  M. Durand,et al.  Salzburg statement on shared decision making , 2011, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  J. Whittle,et al.  Understanding of the benefits of coronary revascularization procedures among patients who are offered such procedures. , 2007, American heart journal.