A Cognitive Apprenticeship Approach to Facilitating Web-based Collaborative Problem Solving

Enhancing students’ problem-solving abilities has been recognized as an important and challenging issue for technology-enhanced learning. Thus, previous research has attempted to address this issue by developing various mechanisms, among which a cognitive apprenticeship model can particularly enhance students’ abilities. However, it is not clear whether such a mechanism is suitable for every learner. Thus, this study examines the effects of human factors on problem-solving effectiveness in the cognitive apprenticeship model. Among various human factors, this study focuses on cognitive styles, with an emphasis on Witken’s Field Dependence. The results indicate that Field Dependent learners can get great benefits from the cognitive apprenticeship model via collaborative learning. Implications for how to accommodate the needs of different cognitive style groups are discussed.

[1]  Judi Repman,et al.  The Relationship of Learning, Behavior, and Cognitive Style in Hypermedia-Based Instruction: Implications for Design of HBI , 1995, Planning Continuing Professional Development.

[2]  Natalie Clewley,et al.  Mining Learning Preferences in Web-based Instruction: Holists vs. Serialists , 2011, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[3]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A knowledge acquisition approach to developing Mindtools for organizing and sharing differentiating knowledge in a ubiquitous learning environment , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[4]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[5]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  An Information-Summarising Instruction Strategy for Improving the Web-Based Problem Solving Abilities of Students. , 2011 .

[6]  Michael J. Hannafin,et al.  Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[7]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  The correlates of Taiwan teachers' epistemological beliefs concerning Internet environments, online search strategies, and search outcomes , 2011, Internet High. Educ..

[8]  Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic,et al.  Handbook of individual differences. , 2011 .

[9]  Does Cognitive Style Affect Bloggers’ Attitude In An Online Learning Environment? , 2011 .

[10]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  An Inquiry-based Mobile Learning Approach to Enhancing Social Science Learning Effectiveness , 2010, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[11]  Adakole Ikpe,et al.  Factors in students' ability to connect school science with community and real-world life , 2010 .

[12]  Sanghee Yeo.  Handbook of individual differences, learning, and instruction. , 2010, Korean journal of medical education.

[13]  Fethi A. Inan,et al.  Perspectives on the Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Web Based Learning Environments , 2010 .

[14]  Symeon Retalis,et al.  Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics , 2010, Comput. Educ..

[15]  J. Michael Spector,et al.  Assessing Progress of Learning in Complex Domains , 2010 .

[16]  Prasart Nuangchalerm,et al.  Factors Influencing Mathematic Problem-Solving Ability of Sixth Grade Students , 2009 .

[17]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  An innovative approach for promoting information exchanges and sharing in a Web 2.0-based learning environment , 2009, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[18]  Pei-Di Shen,et al.  Applying web-enabled self-regulated learning and problem-based learning with initiation to involve low-achieving students in learning , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[19]  Mustafa Sami Topçu,et al.  Elementary Students' Metacognition and Epistemological Beliefs Considering Science Achievement, Gender and Socioeconomic Status , 2009 .

[20]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  An auto-scoring mechanism for evaluating problem-solving ability in a web-based learning environment , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A context-aware ubiquitous learning environment for conducting complex science experiments , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Effandi Zakaria,et al.  Attitudes and problem-solving skills in algebra among Malaysian matriculation college students , 2009 .

[23]  Frederick Stanley Root,et al.  Journal of Social Science , 2009 .

[24]  Hao-Chang Lo.  Utilizing Computer-mediated Communication Tools for Problem-based Learning , 2009, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[25]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A novel approach for assisting teachers in analyzing student web-searching behaviors , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[26]  Julien Mercier,et al.  The structure of the help-seeking process in collaboratively using a computer coach in problem-based learning , 2008, Comput. Educ..

[27]  F. Adesoji.  Students’ Ability Levels and Effectiveness of Problem-Solving Instructional Strategy , 2008 .

[28]  Peter Gerjets,et al.  Instructional support for enhancing students' information problem solving ability , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[29]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Active Learning: Cooperation in the Classroom , 2008 .

[30]  M. Doğru.  The Application of Problem Solving Method on Science Teacher Trainees on the Solution of the Environmental Problems. , 2008 .

[31]  Cor J. M. Suhre,et al.  Schoenfeld's problem solving theory in a student controlled learning environment , 2007, Comput. Educ..

[32]  Zhen-yuan Zhu.  Gender Differences in Mathematical Problem Solving Patterns: A Review of Literature. , 2007 .

[33]  Chia-Ching Lin,et al.  Meta-Analyzer: A Web-based Environment for Analyzing Student Information Searching Behaviors , 2007, Second International Conference on Innovative Computing, Informatio and Control (ICICIC 2007).

[34]  Michele D. Dickey.  Barriers and Enablers in Integrating Cognitive Apprenticeship Methods in a Web-Based Educational Technology Course for K-12 (Primary and Secondary) Teacher Education , 2007 .

[35]  Erdat Cataloglu,et al.  The effects of students' cognitive styles on conceptual understandings and problem‐solving skills in introductory mechanics , 2007 .

[36]  Heinz Mandl,et al.  Conceptual and socio-cognitive support for collaborative learning in videoconferencing environments , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[38]  Arif Altun,et al.  Undergraduate Students\u2019 Academic Achievement, Field Dependent/Independent Cognitive Styles and Attitude toward Computers , 2006, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[39]  Tzu-Chien Liu,et al.  Web-based Cognitive Apprenticeship Model for Improving Pre-service Teachers\u2019 Performances and Attitudes towards Instructional Planning: Design and Field Experiment , 2005, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[40]  İbrahim Bilgin,et al.  A Computer Based Problem Solving Environment in Chemistry. , 2005 .

[41]  Robert D. Macredie,et al.  Cognitive Modeling of Student Learning in Web-Based Instructional Programs , 2004, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[42]  L. Lipponen,et al.  Practices and orientations of CSCL , 2004 .

[43]  M. Neo,et al.  Developing a collaborative learning environment using a web-based design , 2003, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[44]  Dania Bilal,et al.  Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine. III. Cognitive and physical behaviors on fully self-generated search tasks , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[45]  Qing Li.  Exploration of Collaborative Learning and Communication in an Educational Environment Using Computer-Mediated Communication , 2002 .

[46]  Lynette J Stockhausen,et al.  New Learning: Re-apprenticing the learner , 2002 .

[47]  Huey-Wen Chou,et al.  Influences of cognitive style and training method on training effectiveness , 2001, Comput. Educ..

[48]  Cher Hendricks,et al.  Teaching Causal Reasoning Through Cognitive Apprenticeship: What Are Results From Situated Learning? , 2001 .

[49]  BilalDania.  Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine , 2001 .

[50]  Dania Bilal,et al.  Children's use of the Yahooligans! Web search engine: II. Cognitive and physical behaviors on research tasks , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[51]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Matching/mismatching revisited: an empirical study of learning and teaching styles , 2001, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[52]  Brigid Barron.  Achieving Coordination in Collaborative Problem-Solving Groups , 2000 .

[53]  W. Michael Reed,et al.  Asynchronous learning networks and cognitive apprenticeship: a potential model for teaching complex problem-solving skills in corporate environments , 2000 .

[54]  Karen Fullerton,et al.  The interactive effects of field dependence-independence and internet document manipulation style on student achievement from computer-based instruction , 2000 .

[55]  R. Riding,et al.  Cognitive Styles and Learning Strategies , 2013 .

[56]  Nigel Ford,et al.  Levels and types of mediation in instructional systems: an individual differences approach , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[57]  Carolena L. Lyons-Lawrence.  Effect of Learning Style on Performance in Using Computer-Based Instruction in Office Systems , 1994 .

[58]  Jacob Cohen,et al.  A power primer. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[59]  R. Abouserie,et al.  Cognitive Style, Gender, Attitude toward Computer‐assisted Learning and Academic Achievement , 1992 .

[60]  Michael B. Eisenberg,et al.  Information Problem Solving: The Big Six Skills Approach to Library & Information Skills Instruction. , 1990 .

[61]  A. Collins,et al.  Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning , 1989 .

[62]  L. Resnick,et al.  Knowing, Learning, and Instruction , 2018 .

[63]  Susan E. Newman,et al.  Cognitive Apprenticeship: Teaching the Craft of Reading, Writing, and Mathematics. Technical Report No. 403. , 1987 .

[64]  G. Pask.  STYLES AND STRATEGIES OF LEARNING , 1976 .

[65]  C. A. Moore,et al.  FIELD‐DEPENDENT AND FIELD‐INDEPENDENT COGNITIVE STYLES AND THEIR EDUCATIONAL IMPLICATIONS , 1975 .

[66]  Stuart M. Speedie,et al.  Abilities Measured by the Purdue Elementary Problem-Solving Inventory , 1973 .

[67]  T. L. Kelley.  The selection of upper and lower groups for the validation of test items. , 1939 .