Segmentation and numerical analysis of microcalcifications on mammograms using mathematical morphology.

The top-hat and watershed algorithms of mathematical morphology have been applied to detect automatically and segment microcalcifications on mammograms digitized to a pixel resolution of 40 microns using a CCD camera. The database comprised 38 cases from the breast assessment clinic in Liverpool. For all cases, both craniocaudal (CC) and lateral oblique (LO) views were available. 19 cases were proven to be benign and 19 malignant based on cytology and histology. Malignant clusters contained more microcalcifications (14 malignant, 10 benign), occupied a larger area (37 mm2, 9 mm2) and had longer cluster perimeters than benign clusters (33.2 mm, 15.5 mm). Malignant microcalcifications exhibited a wider variety of shapes and were more heterogeneous in terms of image signal intensity than benign microcalcifications. Further mathematical morphology algorithms were applied to describe microcalcification shape in terms of the presence or absence of infoldings, elongation, narrow irregularities and wide irregularities. The three largest microcalcifications were selected for each case and, using a "leave-one-out" approach, each microcalcification was classified in respect of its five nearest neighbours as either malignant or benign. The area under the curve of a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of the proportion of the three microcalcifications which agreed with the true diagnosis increased from 0.73 (CC) and 0.63 (LO) to 0.79 when both views were considered. Next, each cluster in turn was ranked according to its agreement with the database as a whole over 21 features. An ROC analysis was performed to investigate the effect on sensitivity and specificity of the proportion of the nine nearest neighbours that agreed with the true classification. The largest area under the ROC curve was 0.84 produced by the four features of proportion of irregular microcalcifications, proportion of round microcalcifications, number of microcalcifications in the cluster and the interquartile range of microcalcification area. The shape of microcalcifications is confirmed as being of overriding importance in classifying cases as either malignant or benign. This observation motivates a further study enhanced by using magnified views digitized to a higher resolution by a laser scanner. This will enable the reliable assessment of the shape of a greater number of microcalcifications in each cluster, which is likely to increase further the discriminating power of the image analysis routines and lead to the development of an expert system for automatic mammographic screening.

[1]  Serge Beucher,et al.  Use of watersheds in contour detection , 1979 .

[2]  G. Matheron Random Sets and Integral Geometry , 1976 .

[3]  C.E. Shannon,et al.  Communication in the Presence of Noise , 1949, Proceedings of the IRE.

[4]  K L Lam,et al.  Digitization requirements in mammography: effects on computer-aided detection of microcalcifications. , 1994, Medical physics.

[5]  S. Feig,et al.  Evaluation of breast microcalcifications by means of optically magnified tissue specimen radiographs. , 1987, Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer.

[6]  C. Lesty,et al.  An application of mathematical morphology to analysis of the size and shape of nuclei in tissue sections of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. , 1986, Cytometry.

[7]  K Doi,et al.  An improved computer-assisted diagnostic scheme using wavelet transform for detecting clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[8]  M. Giger,et al.  Malignant and benign clustered microcalcifications: automated feature analysis and classification. , 1996, Radiology.

[9]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Xeroradiography of the breast. , 1969, Oncology.

[10]  Huai Li,et al.  Artificial convolution neural network for medical image pattern recognition , 1995, Neural Networks.

[11]  Carey E. Priebe,et al.  Comparative evaluation of pattern recognition techniques for detection of microcalcifications , 1993, Electronic Imaging.

[12]  L P Clarke,et al.  Interpretation of calcifications in screen/film, digitized, and wavelet-enhanced monitor-displayed mammograms: a receiver operating characteristic study. , 1996, Academic radiology.

[13]  B S Worthington,et al.  Computer aids to mammographic diagnosis. , 1987, The British journal of radiology.

[14]  Rangaraj M. Rangayyan,et al.  Application of shape analysis to mammographic calcifications , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[15]  Atam P. Dhawan,et al.  Analysis of mammographic microcalcifications using gray-level image structure features , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[16]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Stochastic model for automated detection of calcifications in digital mammograms , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..

[17]  G H Whitehouse,et al.  Mammographic and pathological correlations in a breast screening programme. , 1983, Clinical radiology.

[18]  Luc Vincent,et al.  Morphological grayscale reconstruction in image analysis: applications and efficient algorithms , 1993, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[19]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.

[20]  Robin N. Strickland,et al.  Wavelet transforms for detecting microcalcifications in mammograms , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[21]  K L Lam,et al.  Computer-aided detection of mammographic microcalcifications: pattern recognition with an artificial neural network. , 1995, Medical physics.

[22]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Computer-assisted analysis of mammographic clustered calcifications. , 1989, Clinical radiology.

[23]  Joachim Dengler,et al.  Segmentation of Microcalcifications in Mammograms , 1991, DAGM-Symposium.

[24]  R. E. Snyder,et al.  A clinicopathologic study of atypical lesions of the breast , 1974 .

[25]  K Doi,et al.  Computerized detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms using a shift-invariant artificial neural network. , 1994, Medical physics.

[26]  F. Meyer Iterative image transformations for an automatic screening of cervical smears. , 1979, The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society.

[27]  E. Sickles Breast calcifications: mammographic evaluation. , 1986, Radiology.

[28]  Jean Serra,et al.  Image Analysis and Mathematical Morphology , 1983 .

[29]  Hidekazu Tsubota,et al.  Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography of avascular necrosis of the femoral head (ANFH). , 1996 .

[30]  S. Beucher,et al.  Morphological segmentation , 1990, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[31]  I. Andersson,et al.  Clustered Breast Calcifications , 1983, Acta radiologica: diagnosis.

[32]  A. Stacey,et al.  The detection and significance of calcifications in the breast: a radiological and pathological study. , 1976, The British journal of radiology.

[33]  D. Dance,et al.  Automatic computer detection of clustered calcifications in digital mammograms , 1990, Physics in medicine and biology.

[34]  J. Hanley,et al.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. , 1982, Radiology.

[35]  E. Fisher,et al.  Evaluation of mammography based upon correlation of specimen mammograms and histopathologic findings. , 1974, American journal of clinical pathology.

[36]  P. F. Winter,et al.  Algorithm for the detection of fine clustered calcifications on film mammograms. , 1988, Radiology.

[37]  L. Clarke,et al.  Tree structured wavelet transform segmentation of microcalcifications in digital mammography. , 1995, Medical physics.

[38]  D. H. Davies Technical note: digital mammography--the comparative evaluation of film digitizers. , 1993, The British journal of radiology.

[39]  K Doi,et al.  Automated segmentation of digitized mammograms. , 1995, Academic radiology.

[40]  R Di Paola,et al.  A fractal approach to the segmentation of microcalcifications in digital mammograms. , 1995, Medical physics.

[41]  K. Doi,et al.  Computer-aided detection of microcalcifications in mammograms. Methodology and preliminary clinical study. , 1988, Investigative radiology.

[42]  D. Dance,et al.  A quantitative analysis of the spatial relationships of grouped microcalcifications demonstrated on xeromammography in benign and malignant breast disease. , 1988, The British journal of radiology.

[43]  R. Zuurbier,et al.  Classification of microcalcifications in radiographs of pathologic specimens for the diagnosis of breast cancer. , 1995 .

[44]  K Doi,et al.  Improvement in radiologists' detection of clustered microcalcifications on mammograms. The potential of computer-aided diagnosis. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[45]  K Doi,et al.  Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography. I. Automated detection of microcalcifications in mammography. , 1987, Medical physics.

[46]  Wolfgang Spiesberger,et al.  Mammogram Inspection by Computer , 1979, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[47]  P. F. Winter,et al.  Breast calcifications: analysis of imaging properties. , 1988, Radiology.

[48]  David Avis,et al.  A Linear Algorithm for Finding the Convex Hull of a Simple Polygon , 1979, Inf. Process. Lett..

[49]  W A Murphy,et al.  Isolated clustered microcalcifications in the breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation. , 1978, Radiology.

[50]  Susan M. Astley,et al.  Combining cues for mammographic abnormalities , 1990, BMVC.

[51]  Serge Beucher Segmentation d'images et morphologie mathématique , 1990 .