Combined distiller waste utilisation and combustion gases desulphurisation method: The case study of soda-ash industry

Abstract In this paper, a concept of technology that can be helpful for lowering the negative influence of the synthetic (based on the Solvay process) soda ash plant on the natural environment is presented. We describe the desulphurisation of combustion gases from the factory's power plant, which is based on their absorption in the overflow of distiller waste. The excess of lime milk, which is added in the process of ammonia regeneration from filter liquor, results in a strong alkalinity of distiller waste. The high pH of distiller waste favours absorption of acidic combustion gases. The laboratory-scale tests showed about 80% efficiency of the desulphurisation process. The suspension samples we obtained consist mainly of CaCO 3 . We suggest using the obtained solid phase as an adsorbent-insert in Fluidised Bed Combustion technology (FBC). Based on raw material prices, production costs, and average sell prices of the product, economic analysis of innovation was executed. Profits from employing the method presented come mainly from reduction of environmental fees. The sensitivity analysis of cost showed that the application of the desulphurisation process causes cost reduction in soda-ash production accounting for € 150 thousand per year (excluding depreciation) in Poland, and € 11,700 thousand per year (excluding depreciation) in Sweden. It has been found that the latter value is similar to the positive environmental impact of this innovation expressed in monetary units (€ 10,350 thousand per year, excluding depreciation).

[1]  Á. Irabien,et al.  SO2 reaction with Ca(OH)2 at medium temperatures (300-425°C) : Kinetic behaviour , 1998 .

[2]  Andrew Y. C. Nee,et al.  Tool to incorporate environmental costs into life-cycle assessment , 2001, SPIE Optics East.

[3]  Thomas Sterner,et al.  Refunded emission payments theory, distribution of costs, and Swedish experience of NOx abatement , 2006 .

[4]  A. Baranzini,et al.  What Do We Know About Carbon Taxes? An Inquiry into Their Impacts on Competitiveness and Distribution of Income , 2003 .

[5]  A. Baranzini,et al.  A future for carbon taxes , 2000 .

[6]  V. G. Pangarkar,et al.  Absorption of sulfur dioxide into aqueous reactive slurries of calcium and magnesium hydroxide in a stirred cell , 2001 .

[7]  T Kasikowski,et al.  Cleaner production in the ammonia-soda industry: an ecological and economic study. , 2004, Journal of environmental management.

[8]  Jacek Kamiński,et al.  Technologies and costs of SO2-emissions reduction for the energy sector , 2003 .

[9]  J. Krozer,et al.  How to get LCA in the right direction , 1998 .

[10]  A. Lyngfelt,et al.  Sulphur capture in circulating fluidized-bed boilers: can the efficiency be predicted? , 1999 .

[11]  D. Cooper,et al.  A thermogravimetric study of the reaction between sulfur dioxide and calcium oxide , 1990 .

[12]  Clausen,et al.  BET Measurements: Outgassing of Minerals. , 2000, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[13]  K. Smekens,et al.  Atmospheric and geological CO2 damage costs in energy scenarios , 2006 .

[14]  Á. Irabien,et al.  Flue gas desulphurization at low temperatures: Thermogravimetric characterization of the reaction product , 1992 .

[15]  Matti Johansson,et al.  Cost curve analysis for SO2 and NOx emission control in Finland , 2003 .

[16]  Markus Amann,et al.  Cost-effective Sulphur Emission Reduction under Uncertainty , 1996 .

[17]  K. Dam-Johansen,et al.  High-temperature reaction between sulphur dioxide and limestone—I. Comparison of limestones in two laboratory reactors and a pilot plant , 1991 .

[18]  Patrick Hofstetter,et al.  Perspectives in life cycle impact assessment , 1998 .

[19]  J. K. Kindig,et al.  Controlling the cost of clean air - A new clean coal technology , 1991 .