Management of today's distributed systems is becoming increasingly complex. There is an obvious requirement for a flexible mechanism to help manage such systems. Rule-based management is one such mechanism. However, in order for rule-based management to become widely usable a method is required by which conflicts between management policies (defined as rules) can be identified and resolved. This paper creates a set theoretic model for rules as a trituple of the relationship between the subject, action and target of a policy. It also identifies two classes of policy set — 'syntactically easy policy set' (SEPS) and 'syntactically non-easy policy set' (SNEPS). SEPSs are policies which are sets of all the Cartesian products of its subjects, actions and targets, whereas SNEPSs are only a subset of that Cartesian product. Conflict analysis of SEPSs has been handled in other papers; this paper addresses conflict analysis of SNEPSs. A method for resolving conflict is suggested. The paper also raises some issues that arise when considering a database of policies.
[1]
Morris Sloman,et al.
Policy Conflict Analysis in Distributed System Management
,
1994
.
[2]
Sidney G. Winter,et al.
Naive Set Theory
,
2021,
Essential Mathematics for Undergraduates.
[3]
Ophir Frieder,et al.
The Architecture of Distributed Computer Systems: A Data Engineering Perspective on Information Systems
,
1997
.
[4]
Damian A. Marriott,et al.
Management policy service for distributed systems
,
1996,
Proceedings of Third International Workshop on Services in Distributed and Networked Environments.
[5]
Emil C. Lupu,et al.
Conflict Analysis for Management Policies
,
1997,
Integrated Network Management.