Are Experienced Hearing Aid Users Faster at Grasping the Meaning of a Sentence Than Inexperienced Users? An Eye-Tracking Study

This study assessed the effects of hearing aid (HA) experience on how quickly a participant can grasp the meaning of an acoustic sentence-in-noise stimulus presented together with two similar pictures that either correctly (target) or incorrectly (competitor) depict the meaning conveyed by the sentence. Using an eye tracker, the time taken by the participant to start fixating the target (the processing time) was measured for two levels of linguistic complexity (low vs. high) and three HA conditions: clinical linear amplification (National Acoustic Laboratories-Revised), single-microphone noise reduction with National Acoustic Laboratories-Revised, and linear amplification ensuring a sensation level of ≥ 15 dB up to at least 4 kHz for the speech material used here. Timed button presses to the target stimuli after the end of the sentences (offline reaction times) were also collected. Groups of experienced (eHA) and inexperienced (iHA) HA users matched in terms of age, hearing loss, and working memory capacity took part (N = 15 each). For the offline reaction times, no effects were found. In contrast, processing times increased with linguistic complexity. Furthermore, for all HA conditions, processing times were longer (poorer) for the iHA group than for the eHA group, despite comparable speech recognition performance. Taken together, these results indicate that processing times are more sensitive to speech processing-related factors than offline reaction times. Furthermore, they support the idea that HA experience positively impacts the ability to process noisy speech quickly, irrespective of the precise gain characteristics.

[1]  R A Bentler,et al.  Does hearing aid benefit increase over time? , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Anna Warzybok,et al.  The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages: A review , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[3]  L. Humes The contributions of audibility and cognitive factors to the benefit provided by amplified speech to older adults. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[4]  Brent Edwards,et al.  The Future of Hearing Aid Technology , 2007, Trends in amplification.

[5]  Rainer Martin,et al.  A novel a priori SNR estimation approach based on selective cepstro-temporal smoothing , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing.

[6]  Giso Grimm,et al.  The master hearing Aid : A PC-based platform for algorithm development and evaluation , 2006 .

[7]  Kara D. Federmeier Thinking ahead: the role and roots of prediction in language comprehension. , 2007, Psychophysiology.

[8]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Development and evaluation of a linguistically and audiologically controlled sentence intelligibility test. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  V. Woisard,et al.  Relationship Between Speech Intelligibility and Speech Comprehension in Babble Noise. , 2015, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[10]  Pamela Souza,et al.  Working Memory, Age, and Hearing Loss: Susceptibility to Hearing Aid Distortion , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[11]  Markus Meis,et al.  Development of a German reading span test with dual task design for application in cognitive hearing research , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[12]  B. Kollmeier Overcoming language barriers: Matrix sentence tests with closed speech corpora , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[13]  A. Meyer,et al.  Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: a review and critical evaluation. , 2011, Acta psychologica.

[14]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  How Hearing Impairment Affects Sentence Comprehension: Using Eye Fixations to Investigate the Duration of Speech Processing , 2015, Trends in hearing.

[15]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  An Eye-Tracking Paradigm for Analyzing the Processing Time of Sentences with Different Linguistic Complexities , 2014, PloS one.

[16]  P. Carpenter,et al.  Individual differences in working memory and reading , 1980 .

[17]  Roger M. Cooper,et al.  The control of eye fixation by the meaning of spoken language: A new methodology for the real-time investigation of speech perception, memory, and language processing. , 1974 .

[18]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Hearing Loss and Perceptual Effort: Downstream Effects on Older Adults’ Memory for Speech , 2005, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[19]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Effects of adult aging and hearing loss on comprehension of rapid speech varying in syntactic complexity. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[20]  Richard Emsley,et al.  Hearing Loss and Cognition: The Role of Hearing Aids, Social Isolation and Depression , 2015, PloS one.

[21]  Karen A. Doherty,et al.  The Effect of Hearing Aid Noise Reduction on Listening Effort in Hearing-Impaired Adults , 2014, Ear and hearing.

[22]  Kevin J Munro,et al.  The effect of speech presentation level on measurement of auditory acclimatization to amplified speech. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  H. Amièva,et al.  Self‐Reported Hearing Loss, Hearing Aids, and Cognitive Decline in Elderly Adults: A 25‐Year Study , 2015, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[24]  J. Obleser,et al.  Upregulation of cognitive control networks in older adults’ speech comprehension , 2013, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[25]  M. Braga,et al.  Exploratory Data Analysis , 2018, Encyclopedia of Social Network Analysis and Mining. 2nd Ed..

[26]  Sridhar Kalluri,et al.  Objective measures of listening effort: effects of background noise and noise reduction. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[27]  B. Kollmeier,et al.  Comparing Eye Tracking with Electrooculography for Measuring Individual Sentence Comprehension Duration , 2016, PloS one.

[28]  Paul D. Allopenna,et al.  Tracking the Time Course of Spoken Word Recognition Using Eye Movements: Evidence for Continuous Mapping Models , 1998 .

[29]  Rolph Houben,et al.  Using response time to speech as a measure for listening effort , 2013, International journal of audiology.

[30]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Hearing Loss in Older Adults Affects Neural Systems Supporting Speech Comprehension , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Giso Grimm,et al.  Perceptual Consequences of Different Signal Changes Due to Binaural Noise Reduction: Do Hearing Loss and Working Memory Capacity Play a Role? , 2014, Ear and hearing.

[32]  Arthur Wingfield,et al.  Response latencies in auditory sentence comprehension: effects of linguistic versus perceptual challenge. , 2010, Psychology and aging.

[33]  C V Palmer,et al.  The functionally and physiologically plastic adult auditory system. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[34]  H. Dillon,et al.  The National Acoustic Laboratories' (NAL) New Procedure for Selecting the Gain and Frequency Response of a Hearing Aid , 1986, Ear and hearing.

[35]  Larry E Humes,et al.  An examination of changes in hearing-aid performance and benefit in the elderly over a 3-year period of hearing-aid use. , 2003, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[36]  Thomas Lunner,et al.  Cognitive function in relation to hearing aid use , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[37]  P. Stelmachowicz,et al.  The Effects of Limited Bandwidth and Noise on Verbal Processing Time and Word Recall in Normal-Hearing Children , 2013, Ear and hearing.

[38]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Speech Rate and Syntactic Complexity as Multiplicative Factors in Speech Comprehension by Young and Older Adults , 2003 .

[39]  Richard C. Hendriks,et al.  Unbiased MMSE-Based Noise Power Estimation With Low Complexity and Low Tracking Delay , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[40]  Kevin J Munro,et al.  Reorganization of the Adult Auditory System: Perceptual and Physiological Evidence From Monaural Fitting of Hearing Aids , 2008, Trends in amplification.

[41]  D. A. Robertson,et al.  Functional Neuroanatomy of the Cognitive Process of Mapping During Discourse Comprehension , 2000, Psychological science.

[42]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Cognitive supports and cognitive constraints on comprehension of spoken language. , 2007, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[43]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .