Personalized Gaming for Motivating Social and Behavioral Science Participation

Game-like environments are increasingly used for conducting research due to the affordances that such environments offer. However, the problem remains that such environments treat their users equally. In order to address this, personalization is necessary. In this paper we discuss the need to personalize gamified research environments to motivate participation by illustrating a playful platform called Mad Science, which is being developed to allow users to create social and behavioral studies. This discussion is both informed by the platform's affordances and use thus far as well as existing theories on player motivation, and contributes to theory-informed approaches to (gamified) personalization technologies.

[1]  W. Bainbridge.  The Scientific Research Potential of Virtual Worlds , 2007, Science.

[2]  Rod McCall,et al.  Infinite Reality: Avatars, Eternal Life, New Worlds, and the Dawn of the Virtual Revolution , 2011, PRESENCE: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments.

[3]  Gillian Smith,et al.  Standing on the Shoulders of Citizens: Exploring Gameful Collaboration for Creating Social Experiments , 2016, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).

[4]  Casper Harteveld,et al.  Triadic Game Design - Balancing Reality, Meaning and Play , 2011 .

[5]  C. Harteveld.  Design Considerations for Creating Game-Based Social Experiments , 2015 .

[6]  Sebastian Deterding,et al.  Situated motivational affordances of game elements: A conceptual model , 2011 .

[7]  Eric Rosenbaum,et al.  Scratch: programming for all , 2009, Commun. ACM.

[8]  Magy Seif El-Nasr,et al.  In Your Face(t) Impact of Personality and Context on Gameplay Behavior , 2015, FDG.

[9]  Juho Hamari,et al.  Player Types: A Meta-synthesis , 2014, Trans. Digit. Games Res. Assoc..

[10]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[11]  Ping Zhang,et al.  Technical opinionMotivational affordances , 2008 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. , 1981, Science.

[13]  M. Csíkszentmihályi.  Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention , 1996 .

[14]  Eric Horvitz,et al.  Volunteering Versus Work for Pay: Incentives and Tradeoffs in Crowdsourcing , 2013, HCOMP.

[15]  Andrew K. Przybylski,et al.  A Motivational Model of Video Game Engagement , 2010 .

[16]  Colin Camerer,et al.  The Effects of Financial Incentives in Experiments: A Review and Capital-Labor-Production Framework , 1999 .

[17]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Motivation and Data Quality in a Citizen Science Game: A Design Science Evaluation , 2013, 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[18]  David Lazer,et al.  Conducting Massively Open Online Social Experiments with Volunteer Science , 2014, AAAI 2014.

[19]  J. Henrich,et al.  The weirdest people in the world? , 2010, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[20]  Michael K. Thomas,et al.  Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns , 2005 .

[21]  Paul A. Cairns,et al.  Introduction to special issue: Video games as research instruments , 2011, Entertain. Comput..

[22]  Jackie Barnes.  When is a Game Not a Game ? , 2017 .

[23]  Randy Pausch,et al.  Learning To Program With Alice , 2004 .

[24]  C. B. Colby.  The weirdest people in the world , 1973 .

[25]  Kylie Peppler,et al.  Gaming the System: Designing with Gamestar Mechanic , 2014 .

[26]  Yetunde Folajimi,et al.  Sustainable Life Cycle Game Design: Mixing Games and Reality to Transform Education , 2016, DiGRA/FDG.

[27]  Samuel D. Gosling,et al.  Personality Profiles Associated with Different Motivations for Playing World of Warcraft , 2013, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[28]  Mark H. Overmars,et al.  Teaching computer science through game design , 2004, Computer.

[29]  Larry Cuban.  Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America , 2010 .

[30]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts , 2011, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[31]  Rogelio Enrique Cardona-Rivera,et al.  The Mimesis Effect: The Effect of Roles on Player Choice in Interactive Narrative Role-Playing Games , 2016, CHI.

[32]  Nick Yee,et al.  Motivations for Play in Online Games , 2006, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[33]  Casper Harteveld,et al.  Design of Playful Authoring Tools for Social and Behavioral Science , 2017, IUI Companion.

[34]  Gijsbert Stoet,et al.  PsyToolkit: A software package for programming psychological experiments using Linux , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[35]  Chek Tien Tan,et al.  Personalised gaming: a motivation and overview of literature , 2012, IE '12.

[36]  E. Deci,et al.  Self‐determination theory and work motivation , 2005 .

[37]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.