The ideal free distribution in humans: An experimental test

How the distribution of resources affects the spatial distribution of animals is a central concern of behavioral ecology. One influential model relating population dynamics to individual foraging behavior is that of ideal free distribution (Fretwell & Lucas, 1970). This model assumes foragers of equal competitive abilities, moving freely from one habitat to another; the choices made by each individual subject are supposed to equalize gains across habitats. The resulting distribution at the group level, or ideal free distribution, has been tested with various animal species. Here we report an experimental test with human subjects competing for money. The results approximate those predicted by the ideal free model, the degree of approximation being consistent with that obtained in other species. This similarity of results supports the application of behavioral ecology models to human performance.

[1]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  The ideal free distribution when competitive abilities differ: an approach based on statistical mechanics , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[2]  Hal Whitehead,et al.  Sperm whalers off the Galápagos Islands and in the Western North Pacific, 1830–1850: Ideal free whalers? , 1991 .

[3]  R. Gray,et al.  Can ecological theory predict the distribution of foraging animals? A critical analysis of experiments on the ideal free distribution , 1993 .

[4]  J. E. Mazur.  Optimization theory fails to predict performance of pigeons in a two-response situation. , 1981, Science.

[5]  S. Fretwell,et al.  On territorial behavior and other factors influencing habitat distribution in birds , 1969 .

[6]  William J. Sutherland,et al.  Aggregation and the `ideal free ` distribution , 1983 .

[7]  Manfred Milinski,et al.  Competitive resource sharing: An experimental test of a learning rule for ESSs , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[8]  D. Harper.  Competitive foraging in mallards: “Ideal free’ ducks , 1982, Animal Behaviour.

[9]  T. Caraco,et al.  Living in groups: is there an optimal group size? , 1984 .

[10]  R. Herrnstein.  Behavior, Reinforcement and Utility , 1990 .

[11]  W. Sutherland.  From Individual Behaviour to Population Ecology , 1996 .

[12]  M. Davison,et al.  The matching law: A research review. , 1988 .

[13]  C. Harley.  Learning the evolutionarily stable strategy. , 1981, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  J E Staddon,et al.  Optimization: a result or a mechanism? , 1983, Science.

[15]  W Vaughan,et al.  Melioration, matching, and maximization. , 1981, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[16]  E. Charnov.  Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem. , 1976, Theoretical population biology.

[17]  Tom Tregenza,et al.  Building on the Ideal Free Distribution , 1995 .

[18]  J. Godin,et al.  Foraging on patchily distributed prey by a cichlid fish (Teleostei, Cichlidae): A test of the ideal free distribution theory , 1984, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  Michael L. Commons,et al.  Matching and maximizing accounts , 1982 .

[20]  Russell D. Gray,et al.  Sparrows, matching and the ideal free distribution: can biological and psychological approaches be synthesized? , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  M. Hassell,et al.  New Inductive Population Model for Insect Parasites and its Bearing on Biological Control , 1969, Nature.

[22]  C. Gallistel.  The organization of learning , 1990 .

[23]  J. G. Ollason,et al.  Foraging wood-ants Formica aquilonia yarrow (hymenoptera: formicidae) tend to adopt the ideal free distribution , 1993, Behavioural Processes.

[24]  Randall M. Peterman,et al.  Movement Dynamics in a Fishery: Application of the Ideal Free Distribution to Spatial Allocation of Effort , 1993 .

[25]  Alasdair I. Houston,et al.  Learning rules, matching and frequency dependence , 1987 .