An analysis on computational load of DIC based on Newton–Raphson scheme

Abstract Improving the computing speed of DIC to realize real-time computation has been increasingly important and highly demanded in recent years since DIC is currently used as an offline technique. In this paper, the computational load of DIC based on Newton–Raphson (NR) scheme, represented by the total number of associated arithmetic operations, is analyzed in detail when different computational configurations are adopted. The computational configurations refer to as the shape function, the interpolation algorithm and the subset size. A theoretical formula is presented to predict the computational load when different computational configurations are used. Then, numerical experiments are performed to obtain the real computing speed of our DIC program. A good inverse correlation is achieved between the theoretical computational load and experimental computing speed.

[1]  H. Lu,et al.  Deformation measurements by digital image correlation: Implementation of a second-order displacement gradient , 2000 .

[2]  Peng Zhou,et al.  Subpixel displacement and deformation gradient measurement using digital image/speckle correlation (DISC) , 2001 .

[3]  Zhaoyang Wang,et al.  Genuine full-field deformation measurement of an object with complex shape using reliability-guided digital image correlation. , 2010, Optics express.

[4]  W. Peters,et al.  Digital Imaging Techniques In Experimental Stress Analysis , 1982 .

[5]  Qifeng Yu,et al.  Digital Image Correlation Using Stochastic Parallel-Gradient-Descent Algorithm , 2013 .

[6]  Hugh Alan Bruck,et al.  Digital image correlation using Newton-Raphson method of partial differential correction , 1989 .

[7]  Kai Li,et al.  A fast digital image correlation method for deformation measurement , 2011 .

[8]  Stéphane Roux,et al.  Extended digital image correlation with crack shape optimization , 2008 .

[9]  W. F. Ranson,et al.  Applications of digital-image-correlation techniques to experimental mechanics , 1985 .

[10]  Hubert W. Schreier,et al.  Image Correlation for Shape, Motion and Deformation Measurements: Basic Concepts,Theory and Applications , 2009 .

[11]  M. A. Sutton,et al.  Systematic errors in digital image correlation caused by intensity interpolation , 2000 .

[12]  Stéphane Roux,et al.  Integrated Digital Image Correlation for the Identification of Mechanical Properties , 2009, MIRAGE.

[13]  Stéphane Roux,et al.  Measuring stress intensity factors with a camera: Integrated digital image correlation (I-DIC) , 2006 .

[14]  B. Pan Recent Progress in Digital Image Correlation , 2011 .

[15]  Wei Tong,et al.  Fast, Robust and Accurate Digital Image Correlation Calculation Without Redundant Computations , 2013, Experimental Mechanics.

[16]  Yan Qiu Chen,et al.  Propagation function for accurate initialization and efficiency enhancement of digital image correlation , 2012 .

[17]  G. Vendroux,et al.  Submicron deformation field measurements: Part 2. Improved digital image correlation , 1998 .