Statistical assessment of mediational effects for logistic mediational models

The concept of mediation has broad applications in medical health studies. Although the statistical assessment of a mediational effect under the normal assumption has been well established in linear structural equation models (SEM), it has not been extended to the general case where normality is not a usual assumption. In this paper, we propose to extend the definition of mediational effects through causal inference. The new definition is consistent with that in linear SEM and does not rely on the assumption of normality. Here, we focus our attention on the logistic mediation model, where all variables involved are binary. Three approaches to the estimation of mediational effects—Delta method, bootstrap, and Bayesian modelling via Monte Carlo simulation are investigated. Simulation studies are used to examine the behaviour of the three approaches. Measured by 95 per cent confidence interval (CI) coverage rate and root mean square error (RMSE) criteria, it was found that the Bayesian method using a non‐informative prior outperformed both bootstrap and the Delta methods, particularly for small sample sizes. Case studies are presented to demonstrate the application of the proposed method to public health research using a nationally representative database. Extending the proposed method to other types of mediational model and to multiple mediators are also discussed. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Equivalence of the Mediation, Confounding and Suppression Effect , 2000, Prevention Science.

[2]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Mediation designs for tobacco prevention research. , 2002, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[3]  S. West,et al.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[4]  Laurence Freedman Erratum to “Confidence intervals and statistical power of the ‘Validation’ ratio for surrogate or intermediate endpoints”: [J. Statist. Plann. Inference 96 (2001) 143–153] , 2002 .

[5]  D. DeMets,et al.  Considerations in the evaluation of surrogate endpoints in clinical trials. summary of a National Institutes of Health workshop. , 2001, Controlled clinical trials.

[6]  H. Kraemer,et al.  How do risk factors work together? Mediators, moderators, and independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors. , 2001, The American journal of psychiatry.

[7]  E. Goodman The role of socioeconomic status gradients in explaining differences in US adolescents' health. , 1999, American journal of public health.

[8]  B. Shadbolt Some correlates of self-rated health for Australian women. , 1997, American journal of public health.

[9]  G. Holmbeck Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. , 1997, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[10]  William B. Hansen,et al.  The law of maximum expected potential effect: constraints placed on program effectiveness by mediator relationships , 1996 .

[11]  S. Folkman,et al.  Socioeconomic Status and Health , 1994 .

[12]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  An Introduction to the Bootstrap , 1995 .

[13]  D. Mackinnon,et al.  Estimating Mediated Effects in Prevention Studies , 1993 .

[14]  B. Graubard,et al.  Statistical validation of intermediate endpoints for chronic diseases. , 1992, Statistics in medicine.

[15]  P. Lewinsohn,et al.  Screening for adolescent depression: a comparison of depression scales. , 1991, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[16]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  B. Muthén A general structural equation model with dichotomous, ordered categorical, and continuous latent variable indicators , 1984 .

[18]  G. Kaplan,et al.  Perceived health and mortality: a nine-year follow-up of the human population laboratory cohort. , 1983, American journal of epidemiology.

[19]  M. Sobel Asymptotic Confidence Intervals for Indirect Effects in Structural Equation Models , 1982 .

[20]  R. Hauser,et al.  The Decomposition of Effects in Path Analysis , 1975 .