The impact of query precision on returned data precision criterion

Data quality continues to be a challenge for many organizations as they look to improve efficiency and customer satisfaction. Most of companies suffer from common data errors. The most common data errors are incomplete or missing data, outdated information and inaccurate data. Although data quality has been defined as fitness for use, models of information quality assessment have thus far tended to ignore the impact of contextual quality on information use and decision outcomes. Contextual assessments can be as important as objective quality criterion because they can affect which information gets used for decision making tasks. Given that, this research focuses on the precision criterion, since Highly precise data can be very critical in several fields and if this dimension of quality is not taken into account, it could cause crucial damages. In This article, we have hypothesized that data returned via an information system can only be precise if it is the result of a specific request from the system final user. For this purpose, we proposed a new function to evaluate the quality of a query, based on this, we developed a tool implementing this function and we experimented to calculate different query's precisions to valid our contribution.

[1]  Jennifer Widom,et al.  Trio: A System for Integrated Management of Data, Accuracy, and Lineage , 2004, CIDR.

[2]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  ConceptBase — A deductive object base for meta data management , 1995, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[3]  Roman Lukyanenko,et al.  The IQ of the Crowd: Understanding and Improving Information Quality in Structured User-Generated Content , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..

[4]  Gio Wiederhold,et al.  Mediators in the architecture of future information systems , 1992, Computer.

[5]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Overview and Framework for Data and Information Quality Research , 2009, JDIQ.

[6]  S. Leonelli Global Data Quality Assessment and the Situated Nature of "Best" Research Practices in Biology , 2017, Data Sci. J..

[7]  Chiara Francalanci,et al.  Data quality assessment from the user's perspective , 2004, IQIS '04.

[8]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Beyond Accuracy: What Data Quality Means to Data Consumers , 1996, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[9]  Jukka M. Leppänen,et al.  Robustness and Precision : How Data Quality May Influence Key Dependent Variables in Infant Eye-Tracker Analyses , 2014 .

[10]  Donald P. Ballou,et al.  Modeling Data and Process Quality in Multi-Input, Multi-Output Information Systems , 1985 .

[11]  A. Maurino,et al.  Quality Assessment for Linked Open Data : A Survey A Systematic Literature Review and Conceptual Framework , 2013 .

[12]  Stuart E. Madnick,et al.  Data and Information Quality Research: Its Evolution and Future , 2014, Computing Handbook, 3rd ed..

[13]  Adir Even,et al.  Data quality assessment in context: A cognitive perspective , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[14]  Jens Lehmann,et al.  Quality assessment for Linked Data: A Survey , 2015, Semantic Web.

[15]  Markus Helfert,et al.  Analyzing Data Quality Trade-Offs in Data-Redundant Systems , 2007 .

[16]  Yangyong Zhu,et al.  The Challenges of Data Quality and Data Quality Assessment in the Big Data Era , 2015, Data Sci. J..

[17]  Ailene K. Ettinger,et al.  Global change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research , 2015 .

[18]  Mario Piattini,et al.  Preface to IWCMQ 2003 , 2003, ER.

[19]  Carlo Batini,et al.  Methodologies for data quality assessment and improvement , 2009, CSUR.