Patterns of Activity in the Categorical Representations of Objects

Object perception has been a subject of extensive fMRI studies in recent years. Yet the nature of the cortical representation of objects in the human brain remains controversial. Analyses of fMRI data have traditionally focused on the activation of individual voxels associated with presentation of various stimuli. The current analysis approaches functional imaging data as collective information about the stimulus. Linking activity in the brain to a stimulus is treated as a pattern-classification problem. Linear discriminant analysis was used to reanalyze a set of data originally published by Ishai et al. (2000), available from the fMRIDC (accession no. 2-20001113D). Results of the new analysis reveal that patterns of activity that distinguish one category of objects from other categories are largely independent of one another, both in terms of the activity and spatial overlap. The information used to detect objects from phase-scrambled control stimuli is not essential in distinguishing one object category from another. Furthermore, performing an object-matching task during the scan significantly improved the ability to predict objects from controls, but had minimal effect on object classification, suggesting that the task-based attentional benefit was nonspecific to object categories.

[1]  Richard O. Duda,et al.  Pattern classification and scene analysis , 1974, A Wiley-Interscience publication.

[2]  J. Fodor The Modularity of mind. An essay on faculty psychology , 1986 .

[3]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[4]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Parallel Models of Associative Memory , 1989 .

[5]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Functional Connectivity: The Principal-Component Analysis of Large (PET) Data Sets , 1993, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[6]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  MRI‐PET Registration with Automated Algorithm , 1993, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[7]  G. Kane Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, vol 1: Foundations, vol 2: Psychological and Biological Models , 1994 .

[8]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of functional MRI time‐series , 1994, Human Brain Mapping.

[9]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Analysis of fMRI Time-Series Revisited , 1995, NeuroImage.

[10]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[11]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Optical Imaging of Functional Organization in the Monkey Inferotemporal Cortex , 1996, Science.

[12]  Keiji Tanaka,et al.  Inferotemporal cortex and object vision. , 1996, Annual review of neuroscience.

[13]  R. Tibshirani,et al.  Improvements on Cross-Validation: The 632+ Bootstrap Method , 1997 .

[14]  Keiji Tanaka Mechanisms of visual object recognition: monkey and human studies , 1997, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Iwao Kanno,et al.  On the Detection of Activation Patterns Using Principal Components Analysis , 1998 .

[17]  S. Edelman,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:316–328(1998) � A Sequence of Object-Processing Stages Revealed by fMRI in the Human Occipital Lobe , 2022 .

[18]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  A cortical representation of the local visual environment , 1998, Nature.

[19]  Katrien van Driessen,et al.  A Fast Algorithm for the Minimum Covariance Determinant Estimator , 1999, Technometrics.

[20]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Nancy Kanwisher,et al.  fMRI evidence for objects as the units of attentional selection , 1999, Nature.

[22]  M. Tarr,et al.  Activation of the middle fusiform 'face area' increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[23]  P. Rousseeuw,et al.  A fast algorithm for the minimum covariance determinant estimator , 1999 .

[24]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Representation of Objects in the Human Occipital and Temporal Cortex , 2000, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  A Cortical Area Selective for Visual Processing of the Human Body , 2001, Science.

[26]  A. Ishai,et al.  Distributed and Overlapping Representations of Faces and Objects in Ventral Temporal Cortex , 2001, Science.

[27]  S. Strother,et al.  Penalized discriminant analysis of [/sup 15/O]-water PET brain images with prediction error selection of smoothness and regularization hyperparameters , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[28]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.