Can You Trust Your Number Sense: Distinct Processing of Numbers and Quantities in Elementary School Children

Theories of number development have traditionally argued that the acquisition and discrimination of symbolic numbers (i.e., number words and digits) are grounded in and are continuously supported by the Approximate Number System (ANS)—an evolutionarily ancient system for number. In the current study, we challenge this claim by investigating whether the ANS continues to support the symbolic number processing throughout development. To this end, we tested 87 first(Age M = 6.54 years, SD = 0.58), third(Age M = 8.55 years, SD = 0.60) and fifth-graders (Age M = 10.63 years, SD = 0.67) on four audio-visual comparison tasks (1) Number words–Digits, (2) Tones–Dots, (3) Number words–Dots, (4) Tones–Digits, while varying the Number Range (Small and Large), and the Numerical Ratio (Easy, Medium, and Hard). Results showed that larger and faster developmental growth in the performance was observed in the Number Words–Digits task, while the tasks containing at least one non-symbolic quantity showed smaller and slower developmental change. In addition, the Ratio effect (i.e., the signature of ANS being addressed) was present in the Tones–Dots, Tones–Digits, and Number Words–Dots tasks, but was absent in the Number Words–Digits task. These findings suggest that it is unlikely that the ANS continuously underlines the acquisition and the discrimination of the symbolic numbers. Rather, our results indicate that non-symbolic quantities and symbolic numbers follow qualitatively distinct developmental paths, and argue that the latter ones are processed in a semantic network which starts to emerge from an early age.

[1]  Emmy Defever,et al.  The Approximate Number System is not Predictive for Symbolic Number Processing in Kindergarteners , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  D. Ansari,et al.  The Relation between Subitizable Symbolic and Non-Symbolic Number Processing over the Kindergarten School-Year. , 2020, Developmental science.

[3]  Marie-Pascale Noël,et al.  Developmental Changes in the Profiles of Dyscalculia: An Explanation Based on a Double Exact-and-Approximate Number Representation Model , 2011, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[4]  S. Dehaene.  Symbols and quantities in parietal cortex: elements of a mathematical theory of number representation and manipulation , 2007 .

[5]  Klaus Willmes,et al.  On the Magnitude Representations of Two-Digit Numbers , 2005 .

[6]  Michael Schneider,et al.  Associations of non-symbolic and symbolic numerical magnitude processing with mathematical competence: a meta-analysis. , 2017, Developmental science.

[7]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Discrimination of Large and Small Numerosities by Human Infants , 2004 .

[8]  C. Gallistel,et al.  Preverbal and verbal counting and computation , 1992, Cognition.

[9]  Wim Fias,et al.  Representation of Number in Animals and Humans: A Neural Model , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  Jan B. F. van Erp,et al.  Multisensory temporal numerosity judgment , 2008, Brain Research.

[11]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  How Many Participants Do We Have to Include in Properly Powered Experiments? A Tutorial of Power Analysis with Reference Tables , 2019, Journal of cognition.

[12]  L. Feigenson,et al.  Changing the precision of preschoolers' approximate number system representations changes their symbolic math performance. , 2016, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[13]  Leif D. Nelson,et al.  A 21 Word Solution , 2012 .

[14]  W. Gevers,et al.  The role of general and number-specific order processing in adults’ arithmetic performance , 2017 .

[15]  R. Núñez,et al.  Is There Really an Evolved Capacity for Number? , 2017, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Representation of number in the brain. , 2009, Annual review of neuroscience.

[17]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Symbolic estrangement or symbolic integration of numerals with quantities: Methodological pitfalls and a possible solution , 2018, PloS one.

[18]  Percival G. Matthews,et al.  Individual Differences in Nonsymbolic Ratio Processing Predict Symbolic Math Performance , 2016, Psychological science.

[19]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian inference for psychology. Part II: Example applications with JASP , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[20]  E. Spelke,et al.  The construction of large number representations in adults , 2003, Cognition.

[21]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications , 2017, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[22]  E. Spelke,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Core systems of number , 2004 .

[23]  Michaël A. Stevens,et al.  A model of exact small-number representation , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[24]  B. Reynvoet,et al.  Children's representation of symbolic and nonsymbolic magnitude examined with the priming paradigm. , 2011, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[25]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Adults' Arithmetic Builds on Fast and Automatic Processing of Arabic Digits: Evidence from an Audiovisual Matching Paradigm , 2014, PloS one.

[26]  Susan Carey,et al.  Where Our Number Concepts Come From. , 2009, The journal of philosophy.

[27]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Training the Approximate Number System Improves Math Proficiency , 2013, Psychological science.

[28]  David Barner,et al.  Ontogenetic Origins of Human Integer Representations , 2019, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[29]  Justin Halberda,et al.  Developmental change in the acuity of the "Number Sense": The Approximate Number System in 3-, 4-, 5-, and 6-year-olds and adults. , 2008, Developmental psychology.

[30]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Generating nonsymbolic number stimuli , 2011, Behavior research methods.

[31]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  The Symbol Grounding Problem Revisited: A Thorough Evaluation of the ANS Mapping Account and the Proposal of an Alternative Account Based on Symbol–Symbol Associations , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[32]  Attila Krajcsi,et al.  The Source of the Symbolic Numerical Distance and Size Effects , 2016, Front. Psychol..

[33]  Ariel Starr,et al.  Number sense in infancy predicts mathematical abilities in childhood , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[34]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[35]  Midori Tokita,et al.  Precision and Bias in Approximate Numerical Judgment in Auditory, Tactile, and Cross-modal Presentation , 2016, Perception.

[36]  E. Spelke,et al.  Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants , 2000, Cognition.

[37]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Symbolic Number Skills Predict Growth in Nonsymbolic Number Skills in Kindergarteners , 2017, Developmental psychology.

[38]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Précis of The Number Sense , 2001 .

[39]  S. Carey.  The Origin of Concepts , 2000 .

[40]  Midori Tokita,et al.  Behavioral evidence for format-dependent processes in approximate numerosity representation , 2012, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[41]  Sara Cordes,et al.  Mapping Among Number Words, Numerals, and Nonsymbolic Quantities in Preschoolers , 2017 .

[42]  Hilary Barth,et al.  Abstract number and arithmetic in preschool children. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Melissa E. Libertus,et al.  Preschool acuity of the approximate number system correlates with school math ability. , 2011, Developmental science.

[44]  ROBERT S. MOYER,et al.  Time required for Judgements of Numerical Inequality , 1967, Nature.

[45]  Midori Tokita,et al.  Is approximate numerical judgment truly modality-independent? Visual, auditory, and cross-modal comparisons , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[46]  M. von Aster,et al.  Number development and developmental dyscalculia , 2007, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[47]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Challenging the neurobiological link between number sense and symbolic numerical abilities , 2020, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[48]  J. LeFevre,et al.  The integration of symbolic and non-symbolic representations of exact quantity in preschool children , 2017, Cognition.

[49]  Daniel Ansari,et al.  Evidence against a strong association between numerical symbols and the quantities they represent , 2012, CogSci.

[50]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  Attaching meaning to the number words: contributions of the object tracking and approximate number systems. , 2018, Developmental science.

[51]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Numerals do not need numerosities: robust evidence for distinct numerical representations for symbolic and non-symbolic numbers , 2020, Psychological Research.

[52]  Manuela Piazza,et al.  Neurocognitive start-up tools for symbolic number representations , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Approximate number sense, symbolic number processing, or number-space mappings: what underlies mathematics achievement? , 2013, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[54]  Anna Shusterman,et al.  Do analog number representations underlie the meanings of young children’s verbal numerals? , 2017, Cognition.

[55]  Jennifer Wiley,et al.  What Are the Odds? A Practical Guide to Computing and Reporting Bayes Factors , 2014, J. Probl. Solving.

[56]  Bert Reynvoet,et al.  Evidence for distinct magnitude systems for symbolic and non-symbolic number , 2017, Psychological research.

[57]  Charles Tijus,et al.  Young children’s mapping between arrays, number words, and digits , 2013, Cognition.

[58]  Emmy Defever,et al.  Association between basic numerical abilities and mathematics achievement. , 2012, The British journal of developmental psychology.

[59]  From continuous magnitudes to symbolic numbers: The centrality of ratio , 2017, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[60]  D. Ansari,et al.  How Are Symbols and Nonsymbolic Numerical Magnitudes Related? Exploring Bidirectional Relationships in Early Numeracy , 2019, Mind, Brain, and Education.

[61]  G. Fechner.  Elemente der Psychophysik , 1998 .

[62]  Tali Leibovich,et al.  The symbol-grounding problem in numerical cognition: A review of theory, evidence, and outstanding questions. , 2016, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[63]  C. Gilmore,et al.  Children's mapping between symbolic and nonsymbolic representations of number. , 2009, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[64]  Stanislas Dehaene,et al.  Development of Elementary Numerical Abilities: A Neuronal Model , 1993, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[65]  E. Kroesbergen,et al.  On the Difference Between Numerosity Processing and Number Processing , 2018, Front. Psychol..

[66]  J. Halberda,et al.  Acquisition of the Cardinal Principle Coincides with Improvement in Approximate Number System Acuity in Preschoolers , 2016, PloS one.

[67]  Elizabeth M. Brannon,et al.  Improving arithmetic performance with number sense training: An investigation of underlying mechanism , 2014, Cognition.

[68]  Ellen Bialystok,et al.  Symbolic representation of letters and numbers , 1992 .

[69]  S. Göbel,et al.  Arabic digits and spoken number words: Timing modulates the cross-modal numerical distance effect , 2019, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[70]  Gábor Lengyel,et al.  Symbolic Number Comparison Is Not Processed by the Analog Number System: Different Symbolic and Non-symbolic Numerical Distance and Size Effects , 2018, Front. Psychol..