Using the ALARP principle for safety management in the energy production sector of chemical industry

Abstract In the context of chemical industry, in particular in high hazard industries, the adoption of safety measures is essential to reduce risks and environmental impacts, due to the release of dangerous substances, at level that is reasonably practicable. The ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) principle is broadly used for decision-making in safety management, supported by cost-benefit analyses and the grossly disproportionate criterion, but without paying the proper attention to the decision frame (defined by the level of uncertainty and knowledge of the chemical phenomena, the use of best available technologies, the potential of major losses due to the release of hazardous materials and other items). In this paper, by examining the energy production sector of chemical industry, it will be argued that the decision context makes the application of the ALARP principle not always proper, whereas a dynamic interpretation, in which decisions are made oscillating between two borderlines, where in one case reference is made to expected values and in the other one to the precautionary principle, is more appropriate.

[1]  Genserik Reniers,et al.  Application of a multi-plant QRA: A case study investigating the risk impact of the construction of a new plant on an existing chemical plant's risk levels , 2013 .

[2]  B J M Ale,et al.  Tolerable or Acceptable: A Comparison of Risk Regulation in the United Kingdom and in the Netherlands , 2005, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[3]  Terje Aven,et al.  Risk Management and Governance: Concepts, Guidelines and Applications , 2010 .

[4]  H. Levy,et al.  Capital investment and financial decisions , 1978 .

[5]  T. Aven,et al.  Safety management and the use of expected values , 2004 .

[6]  M. Binder The Role of Risk and Cost-Benefit Analysis in Determining Quarantine Measures , 2002 .

[7]  Paul Baybutt The ALARP principle in process safety , 2014 .

[8]  J. Vinnem Offshore Risk Assessment , 1999 .

[9]  Andrew Hopkins,et al.  Risk-management and rule-compliance: Decision-making in hazardous industries , 2011 .

[10]  Hans J. Pasman,et al.  A review of the past, present and future of the European loss prevention and safety promotion in the process industries , 2014 .

[11]  Terje Aven Quantitative risk assessment , 2016 .

[12]  Ulrich Hauptmanns,et al.  Management of health, safety and environment in process industry , 2008 .

[13]  T. Bedford,et al.  Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods , 2001 .

[14]  H. Levin,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis: Methods and Applications , 2000 .

[15]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  Risk Management: With Applications from the Offshore Petroleum Industry , 2007 .

[16]  Terje Aven,et al.  A framework for selection of strategy for management of security measures , 2017 .

[17]  Terje Aven,et al.  Improving risk characterisations in practical situations by highlighting knowledge aspects, with applications to risk matrices , 2017, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Terje Aven,et al.  On how to define, understand and describe risk , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[19]  Nicholas J. Bahr System safety engineering and risk assessment , 2013 .

[20]  Eirik Bjorheim Abrahamsen,et al.  A note on the layered approach for implementing ALARP and the grossly disproportionate criterion , 2017 .

[21]  Eirik Bjorheim Abrahamsen,et al.  On the appropriateness of using the ALARP principle in safety management , 2015 .

[22]  T. Abrahamsen On the Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis in ALARP Processes , 2007 .

[23]  Ben J. M. Ale,et al.  ALARP and CBA all in the same game , 2015 .

[24]  Terje Aven,et al.  Integrated framework for safety management and uncertainty management , 2010 .