Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures

In this study, we develop a theoretical model based on social network theories and analytical methods for exploring collaboration (co-authorship) networks of scholars. We use measures from social network analysis (SNA) (i.e., normalized degree centrality, normalized closeness centrality, normalized betweenness centrality, normalized eigenvector centrality, average ties strength, and efficiency) for examining the effect of social networks on the (citation-based) performance of scholars in a given discipline (i.e., information systems). Results from our statistical analysis using a Poisson regression model suggest that research performance of scholars (g-index) is positively correlated with four SNA measures except for the normalized betweenness centrality and the normalized closeness centrality measures. Furthermore, it reveals that only normalized degree centrality, efficiency, and average ties strength have a positive significant influence on the g-index (as a performance measure). The normalized eigenvector centrality has a negative significant influence on the g-index. Based on these results, we can imply that scholars, who are connected to many distinct scholars, have a better citation-based performance (g-index) than scholars with fewer connections. Additionally, scholars with large average ties strengths (i.e., repeated co-authorships) show a better research performance than those with low tie strengths (e.g., single co-authorships with many different scholars). The results related to efficiency show that scholars, who maintain a strong co-authorship relationship to only one co-author of a group of linked co-authors, perform better than those researchers with many relationships to the same group of linked co-authors. The negative effect of the normalized eigenvector suggests that scholars should work with many students instead of other well-performing scholars. Consequently, we can state that the professional social network of researchers can be used to predict the future performance of researchers.

[1]  Jörn Altmann,et al.  Evaluating scholars based on their academic collaboration activities: two indices, the RC-index and the CC-index, for quantifying collaboration activities of researchers and scientific communities , 2010, Scientometrics.

[2]  A. Raan Measuring Science: Capita Selecta of Current Main Issues , 2004 .

[3]  G. Melin Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level , 2000 .

[4]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Google Scholar citations and Google Web/URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[5]  Harold Guetzkow,et al.  The Impact of Certain Communication Nets Upon Organization and Performance in Task-Oriented Groups , 1955 .

[6]  Jörn Altmann,et al.  On the Correlation between Research Performance and Social Network Analysis Measures Applied to Research Collaboration Networks , 2011, 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[7]  O. Persson,et al.  Understanding Patterns of International Scientific Collaboration , 1992 .

[8]  Ricardo B. Duque,et al.  Collaboration Paradox , 2005 .

[9]  KoushaKayvan,et al.  Google Scholar citations and Google Web-URL citations: A multi-discipline exploratory analysis , 2007 .

[10]  D. Stokols,et al.  In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration Lessons learned and implications for active living research. , 2005, American journal of preventive medicine.

[11]  Yannis Manolopoulos,et al.  Generalized Hirsch h-index for disclosing latent facts in citation networks , 2007, Scientometrics.

[12]  Walter W. Powell,et al.  A Comparison of U.S. and European University-Industry Relations in the Life Sciences , 2001 .

[13]  B. Shekar,et al.  Discovering Mentorship Information from Author Collaboration Networks , 2007, Discovery Science.

[14]  Yang Tao,et al.  A Study on Development Planning for Management Science and Engineering , 2006 .

[15]  S. Borgatti Centrality and AIDS , 1995 .

[16]  Mônica G. Campiteli,et al.  Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? , 2006, Scientometrics.

[17]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[18]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[19]  John J. Binder On The Use Of The Multivariate Regression-Model In Event Studies , 1985 .

[20]  Kon Shing Kenneth Chung,et al.  Measuring Performance of Knowledge-Intensive Workgroups through Social Networks , 2009 .

[21]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems , 2004 .

[22]  Ezra W. Zuckerman,et al.  Networks, Diversity, and Productivity: The Social Capital of Corporate R&D Teams , 2001 .

[23]  D. Krackhardt The strength of strong ties: The importance of Philos in organizations , 2003 .

[24]  Jörn Altmann,et al.  A Social Network System for Analyzing Publication Activities of Researchers , 2010, SOCO 2010.

[25]  John Scott Social Network Analysis , 1988 .

[26]  Kibae Kim,et al.  Measuring and Analyzing the Openness of the Web2.0 Service Network for Improving the Innovation Capacity of the Web2.0 System through Collective Intelligence , 2010 .

[27]  H. Leavitt Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. , 1951, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[28]  Alex Bavelas,et al.  Communication Patterns in Task‐Oriented Groups , 1950 .

[29]  Jörn Altmann,et al.  Evaluating the Productivity of Researchers and their Communities: The RP-Index and the CP-Index , 2010 .

[30]  Barry Bozeman,et al.  The Impact of Research Collaboration on Scientific Productivity , 2005 .

[31]  Martin G. Everett,et al.  Network analysis of 2-mode data , 1997 .

[32]  A. D. Jackson,et al.  Measures for measures , 2006, Nature.

[33]  L. Egghe,et al.  Theory and practise of the g-index , 2006, Scientometrics.

[34]  András Schubert,et al.  Successive h-indices , 2007, Scientometrics.

[35]  P. Bonacich Factoring and weighting approaches to status scores and clique identification , 1972 .

[36]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  Rational (successive) h-indices: An application to economics in the Republic of Ireland , 2008, Scientometrics.

[37]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A Hirsch-type index for journals , 2006, Scientometrics.

[38]  Daniel Z. Levin,et al.  The Strength of Weak Ties You Can Trust: The Mediating Role of Trust in Effective Knowledge Transfer , 2004, Manag. Sci..

[39]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[40]  Britta Ruhnau,et al.  Eigenvector-centrality - a node-centrality? , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[41]  Yong Lu,et al.  Social Network Analysis of a Criminal Hacker Community , 2010, J. Comput. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research , 2005 .

[43]  Alex Bavelas A Mathematical Model for Group Structures , 1948 .

[44]  Yichuan Jiang Locating active actors in the scientific collaboration communities based on interaction topology analyses , 2007, Scientometrics.

[45]  Linton C. Freeman,et al.  The gatekeeper, pair-dependency and structural centrality , 1980 .

[46]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. , 1994 .

[47]  Gert Sabidussi,et al.  The centrality index of a graph , 1966 .

[48]  Richard S. J. Tol,et al.  A rational, successive g-index applied to economics departments in Ireland , 2008, J. Informetrics.

[49]  D. Sonnenwald Scientific collaboration , 2007, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[50]  K. S. Chung Understanding Attitudes towards Performance in Knowledge-intensive Work: The Influence of Social Networks and ICT Use , 2009 .

[51]  L. Freeman Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification , 1978 .

[52]  M. Leclerc,et al.  International scientific cooperation: The continentalization of science , 1994, Scientometrics.

[53]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  The Search-Transfer Problem: The Role of Weak Ties in Sharing Knowledge across Organization Subunits , 1999 .

[54]  R. Cross,et al.  THE STRENGTH OF WEAK TIES YOU CAN TRUST: THE MEDIATING ROLE OF TRUST IN EFFECTIVE KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER. , 2002 .

[55]  Michael R. Gibbons,et al.  MULTIVARIATE TESTS OF FINANCIAL MODELS A New Approach , 1982 .

[56]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[57]  Olle Persson,et al.  The measurement of international scientific collaboration , 1993, Scientometrics.