Simulated Critical Differences for Speech Reception Thresholds.

Purpose Critical differences state by how much 2 test results have to differ in order to be significantly different. Critical differences for discrimination scores have been available for several decades, but they do not exist for speech reception thresholds (SRTs). This study presents and discusses how critical differences for SRTs can be estimated by Monte Carlo simulations. As an application of this method, critical differences are proposed for a 5-word sentences test (a matrix test) using 2 widely implemented adaptive test procedures. Method For each procedure, simulations were performed for different parameters: the number of test sentences, the j factor, the distribution of the subjects' true SRTs, and the slope of the discrimination function. For 1 procedure and 1 parameter setting, simulation data are compared with results found by listening tests (experimental data). Results The critical differences were found to depend on the parameters tested, including interactive effects. The critical differences found by simulation agree with data found experimentally. Conclusions As the critical differences for SRTs rely on multiple parameters, they must be determined for each parameter setting individually. However, with knowledge of the test setup, rules of thumb can be derived.

[1]  Anna Warzybok,et al.  Speech-in-noise tests for multilingual hearing screening and diagnostics1. , 2013, American journal of audiology.

[2]  Anna Warzybok,et al.  Development of the Russian matrix sentence test , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[3]  B. Hagerman,et al.  Reliability in the Determination of Speech Discrimination , 1976 .

[4]  Jacob J Oleson,et al.  Bayesian credible intervals for binomial proportions in a single patient trial , 2010, Statistical methods in medical research.

[5]  Anna Warzybok,et al.  Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise , 2010, International journal of audiology.

[6]  B Hagerman,et al.  Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.

[7]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Astrid van Wieringen,et al.  Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: A multi-center study , 2012, International journal of audiology.

[9]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[10]  A. Thornton,et al.  Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  R. Schlauch,et al.  Critical difference table for word recognition testing derived using computer simulation. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[12]  Anna Warzybok,et al.  An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[13]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise , 2012, International journal of audiology.

[14]  Astrid van Wieringen,et al.  Development of a Dutch matrix sentence test to assess speech intelligibility in noise , 2014, International journal of audiology.

[15]  A. Boothroyd,et al.  Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  B Hagerman,et al.  Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise. , 1995, Scandinavian audiology.

[17]  Wouter A Dreschler,et al.  Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, Part 1: Test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification , 2011, International journal of audiology.

[18]  K. Wagener,et al.  Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise: Diseño, optimización y evaluación de la prueba Danesa de frases en ruido , 2003, International journal of audiology.

[19]  Anna Warzybok,et al.  The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages: A review , 2015, International journal of audiology.

[20]  R. Darlington,et al.  Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.

[21]  Birger Kollmeier,et al.  The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment , 2014, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[22]  Ellen Raben Pedersen,et al.  User-operated speech in noise test: Implementation and comparison with a traditional test , 2014, International journal of audiology.