Simulated Critical Differences for Speech Reception Thresholds.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Anna Warzybok,et al. Speech-in-noise tests for multilingual hearing screening and diagnostics1. , 2013, American journal of audiology.
[2] Anna Warzybok,et al. Development of the Russian matrix sentence test , 2015, International journal of audiology.
[3] B. Hagerman,et al. Reliability in the Determination of Speech Discrimination , 1976 .
[4] Jacob J Oleson,et al. Bayesian credible intervals for binomial proportions in a single patient trial , 2010, Statistical methods in medical research.
[5] Anna Warzybok,et al. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise , 2010, International journal of audiology.
[6] B Hagerman,et al. Sentences for testing speech intelligibility in noise. , 1982, Scandinavian audiology.
[7] Birger Kollmeier,et al. Efficient adaptive procedures for threshold and concurrent slope estimates for psychophysics and speech intelligibility tests. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[8] Astrid van Wieringen,et al. Comparison of three types of French speech-in-noise tests: A multi-center study , 2012, International journal of audiology.
[9] Birger Kollmeier,et al. Development and evaluation of the Turkish matrix sentence test , 2015, International journal of audiology.
[10] A. Thornton,et al. Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[11] R. Schlauch,et al. Critical difference table for word recognition testing derived using computer simulation. , 2007, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[12] Anna Warzybok,et al. An Italian matrix sentence test for the evaluation of speech intelligibility in noise , 2015, International journal of audiology.
[13] Birger Kollmeier,et al. A Spanish matrix sentence test for assessing speech reception thresholds in noise , 2012, International journal of audiology.
[14] Astrid van Wieringen,et al. Development of a Dutch matrix sentence test to assess speech intelligibility in noise , 2014, International journal of audiology.
[15] A. Boothroyd,et al. Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] B Hagerman,et al. Efficient adaptive methods for measuring speech reception threshold in quiet and in noise. , 1995, Scandinavian audiology.
[17] Wouter A Dreschler,et al. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, Part 1: Test evaluation for noise-induced hearing loss identification , 2011, International journal of audiology.
[18] K. Wagener,et al. Design, optimization and evaluation of a Danish sentence test in noise: Diseño, optimización y evaluación de la prueba Danesa de frases en ruido , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[19] Anna Warzybok,et al. The multilingual matrix test: Principles, applications, and comparison across languages: A review , 2015, International journal of audiology.
[20] R. Darlington,et al. Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. , 1968, Psychological bulletin.
[21] Birger Kollmeier,et al. The development and evaluation of the Finnish Matrix Sentence Test for speech intelligibility assessment , 2014, Acta oto-laryngologica.
[22] Ellen Raben Pedersen,et al. User-operated speech in noise test: Implementation and comparison with a traditional test , 2014, International journal of audiology.