Evaluating the First U.S. Consensus Conference: The Impact of the Citizens’ Panel on Telecommunications and the Future of Democracy

Consensus conferences, also known as citizens’ panels—a collection of lay citizens akin to a jury but charged with deliberating on policy issues with a high technical content—are a potentially important way to conduct technology assessments, inform policy makers about public views of new technologies, and improve public understanding of and participation in technological decision making. The first citizens’ panel in the United States occurred in April 1997 on the issue of “Telecommunications and the Future of Democracy.” This article evaluates the impact of this citizens’ panel. The standard criteria to evaluate the impact of analyses focus on the “actual impact” and on the “impact on general thinking.” To these standard criteria, this article introduces the evaluation of two impacts related to learning: impact on the training of knowledgeable personnel and the interaction with lay knowledge. The impact evaluation is based on a nearly comprehensive set of semistructured telephone interviews with the participants in the panel.

[1]  Herbert Paschen,et al.  Parliaments and technology : the development of technology assessment in Europe , 2000 .

[2]  Johs Grundahl,et al.  The Danish consensus conference model , 1995 .

[3]  Nancy B. Shulock,et al.  The paradox of policy analysis: If it is not used, why do we produce so much of it? , 1999 .

[4]  Frank N. Laird,et al.  Participatory Analysis, Democracy, and Technological Decision Making , 1993 .

[5]  John Grin,et al.  Technology Assessment through interaction. A guide , 1997 .

[6]  R. Herdman.  The congressional Office of Technology Assessment. , 1989, JAMA.

[7]  Richard E. Sclove.  Town meetings on technology , 1996 .

[8]  Roger Herdman,et al.  The OTA story: The agency perspective , 1997 .

[9]  D. Guston.  Critical appraisal in science and technology policy analysis: The example of Science, the endless frontier , 1997 .

[10]  D. Guston.  Evaluating the Impact of the First U . S . Citizens ' Panel on ' Telecommunications and the Future of Democracy ' , 1998 .

[11]  John W. Kingdon.  Agendas, alternatives, and public policies , 1984 .

[12]  Jon Fixdal.  Consensus conferences as ‘extended peer groups’ , 1997 .

[13]  C. Weiss.  Using social research in public policy making , 1979 .

[14]  David H. Guston,et al.  Introduction: The end of OTA and the future of technology assessment , 1997 .

[15]  Steven J. Marcus.  Something to sing about , 1997 .

[16]  Giandomenico Majone,et al.  The Critical Appraisal of Scientific Inquiries with Policy Implications , 1985 .

[17]  C. Lindblom.  Inquiry and Change: The Troubled Attempt to Understand and Shape Society , 1992 .

[18]  David H. Guston,et al.  Stabilizing the Boundary between US Politics and Science: , 1999, Social studies of science.

[19]  Simon Joss.  Participation in parliamentary technology assessment: from theory to practice , 2000 .

[20]  Fred B. Wood.  Lessons in technology assessment , 1997 .

[21]  Public management research: The triumph of art over science , 1994 .

[22]  Simon Joss,et al.  Danish consensus conferences as a model of participatory technology assessment: An impact study of consensus conferences on Danish Parliament and Danish public debate , 1998 .

[23]  Simon Joss,et al.  Public participation in science : the role of consensus conferences in Europe , 1995 .