Export and Productivity in Global Value Chains: Comparative Evidence from Latvia and Estonia

This paper investigates the effect of export entry on productivity, employment and wages of Latvian and Estonian firms in the context of global value chain (GVC). Like in many countries, exporting firms in Latvia and Estonia are more productive, larger, pay higher wages and are more capital intensive than non-exporting firms. While this is partly because firms that are originally more productive and have better performances are more likely to enter export, Latvian and Estonian firms also realise more than 23% and 14% higher labour productivity level as the result of export entry. Export entry also increases employment and average wages. Gains in productivity and employment are particularly large when firms enter exports that are related to participation in knowledge-intensive activities found in the upstream of GVC. For instance, Latvian firms that start exporting intermediate goods or non-transport services (which include knowledge intensive services) enjoy significantly higher productivity gains than those starting to export final goods or transport services. These findings underscore the importance of innovation policies that strengthen firms’ capabilities to supply highly differentiated knowledge-intensive goods and services to GVC.

[1]  S. Miroudot,et al.  Services In Global Value Chains: From Inputs to Value-Creating Activities , 2017 .

[2]  Priit Vahter,et al.  Knowledge Transfer from Multinationals through Labour Mobility: Learning from Export Experience , 2016 .

[3]  S. Roper,et al.  Experience, age and exporting performance in UK SMEs , 2016 .

[4]  D. Taglioni,et al.  Making Global Value Chains Work for Development , 2016 .

[5]  K. Beņkovskis,et al.  Evaluation of Latvia’s re-exports using firm-level trade data , 2016 .

[6]  C. Freund,et al.  Exporter Behavior, Country Size and Stage of Development: Evidence from the Exporter Dynamics Database , 2015 .

[7]  F. di Mauro,et al.  Assessing European Competitiveness: The New CompNet Microbased Database , 2015 .

[8]  Priit Vahter,et al.  Foreign market experience, learning by hiring and firm export performance , 2014 .

[9]  Priit Vahter,et al.  The Role of Product-Level Dynamics in Export Growth and Productivity: Evidence from Estonia , 2014 .

[10]  F. Sjöholm,et al.  Global Engagement and the Occupational Structure of Firms , 2014 .

[11]  Mirabelle Muûls Exporters, Importers and Credit Constraints , 2014 .

[12]  Luca David Opromolla,et al.  Micro-Based Evidence of EU Competitiveness: The CompNet Database , 2014, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[13]  Jan De Loecker,et al.  Detecting Learning by Exporting , 2013 .

[14]  Kunal Dasgupta Learning and Knowledge Diffusion in a Global Economy , 2012 .

[15]  Davin Chor,et al.  Measuring the Upstreamness of Production and Trade Flows , 2012 .

[16]  Lubomír Lízal,et al.  The Impact of Capital Measurement Error Correction on Firm-Level Production Function Estimation , 2012 .

[17]  Priit Vahter,et al.  Exporting and Productivity: The Effects of Multi-Market and Multi-Product Export Entry , 2011 .

[18]  J. Shaver The benefits of geographic sales diversification: How exporting facilitates capital investment , 2011 .

[19]  Jonathan Vogel,et al.  An Elementary Theory of Global Supply Chains , 2011, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[20]  P. Bustos Trade Liberalization, Exports, and Technology Upgrading: Evidence on the Impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian Firms , 2011 .

[21]  Ragnhild Balsvik,et al.  Is Labor Mobility a Channel for Spillovers from Multinationals? Evidence from Norwegian Manufacturing , 2011, The Review of Economics and Statistics.

[22]  Jason L. Dedrick,et al.  Who Profits from Innovation in Global Value Chains? A Study of the iPod and Notebook PCs , 2010 .

[23]  Antoine Berthou,et al.  How Do Multiproduct Exporters React to a Change in Trade Costs? , 2009 .

[24]  S. Roper,et al.  Modelling the innovation value chain , 2008 .

[25]  T. Mayer,et al.  The Happy Few: The Internationalisation of European Firms , 2007 .

[26]  Jan De Loecker,et al.  Do exports generate higher productivity? Evidence from Slovenia , 2007 .

[27]  David Greenaway,et al.  Firm Heterogeneity, Exporting and Foreign Direct Investment , 2007 .

[28]  Mark J. Roberts,et al.  Export Market Participation, Investments in R&D and Worker Training, and the Evolution of Firm Productivity , 2007 .

[29]  Bettina Peters,et al.  Innovation and Productivity Across Four European Countries , 2006 .

[30]  M. Jacobides,et al.  Benefiting from Innovation: Value Creation, Value Appropriation and the Role of Industry Architectures , 2006 .

[31]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[32]  D. Greenaway,et al.  Globalisation , Productivity and Technology Research Paper 2005 / 32 Firm Heterogeneity , Exporting and Foreign Direct Investment : A Survey , 2005 .

[33]  Johannes Van Biesebroeck,et al.  Exporting Raises Productivity in Sub-Saharan African Manufacturing Plants , 2005 .

[34]  Chiara Criscuolo,et al.  Global Engagement and the Innovation Activities of Firms , 2005 .

[35]  Paul J. Gertler,et al.  Learning from exporting revisited in a less developed setting , 2004 .

[36]  A. Bernard Exporting and Productivity in the USA , 2004 .

[37]  Gordon H. Hanson,et al.  Intermediaries in Entrepot Trade: Hong Kong Re-Exports of Chinese Goods , 2001 .

[38]  G. Gereffi International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain , 1999 .

[39]  Bruno Crépon,et al.  Research, Innovation, and Productivity: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level , 1998 .

[40]  A. Bernard,et al.  Exceptional Exporter Performance: Cause, Effect, or Both? , 1997 .

[41]  Elhanan Helpman,et al.  R&D Spillovers and Global Growth , 1996, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[42]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[43]  Thomas Chaney Liquidity Constrained Exporters , 2013 .

[44]  Understanding Cross-country Differences in Exporter Premia — Comparable Evidence for 14 Countries , 2022, Microeconometric Studies of Firms' Imports and Exports.