Proposal and experimental validation of a design strategy for a UAV with a passive rotating spherical shell

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) such as multi-copters are expected to be used for inspection of aged infrastructure or for searching damaged buildings in the event of a disaster. However, in a confined space in such environments, UAVs suffer a high risk of falling as a result of contact with an obstacle. To ensure an aerial inspection in the confined space, we have proposed a UAV with a passive rotating spherical shell (PRSS UAV); The UAV and the spherical shell are connected by a 3DOF gimbal mechanism to allow them to rotate in all directions independently, so that the UAV can maintain its flight stability during a collision with an obstacle because only the shell is disturbed and rotated. To apply the PRSS UAV into real-world missions, we have to carefully choose many design parameters such as weight, structure, diameter, strength of the spherical shell, axis configuration of the gimbal, and model of the UAV. In this paper, we propose a design strategy for applying the concept of the PRSS mechanism, focusing on disaster response and infrastructure inspection. We also demonstrate the validity of this approach by the successful result of quantitative experiments and practical field tests.

[1]  Alexander Ferworn,et al.  Initial experiments on 3D modeling of complex disaster environments using unmanned aerial vehicles , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Safety, Security, and Rescue Robotics.

[2]  Matthew Spenko,et al.  Design and experimental validation of HyTAQ, a Hybrid Terrestrial and Aerial Quadrotor , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[3]  Raffaello D'Andrea,et al.  Stability and control of a quadrocopter despite the complete loss of one, two, or three propellers , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[4]  Steven Lake Waslander,et al.  Fault tolerant path following for a quadrotor , 2013, 52nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[5]  Albert Albers,et al.  Semi-autonomous flying robot for physical interaction with environment , 2010, 2010 IEEE Conference on Robotics, Automation and Mechatronics.

[6]  Masayuki Inaba,et al.  MUWA: Multi-field universal wheel for air-land vehicle with quad variable-pitch propellers , 2013, 2013 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[7]  Lorenzo Marconi,et al.  Modeling and control of a flying robot for contact inspection , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[8]  Jur P. van den Berg,et al.  Automatic collision avoidance for manually tele-operated unmanned aerial vehicles , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA).

[9]  Dario Floreano,et al.  A Collision‐resilient Flying Robot , 2014, J. Field Robotics.

[10]  Aditya Tripathi,et al.  Modeling, analysis and fabrication of a thrust vectoring spherical VTOL aerial vehicle , 2014, 2014 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[11]  Adam Jacoff,et al.  Stepfield pallets: repeatable terrain for evaluating robot mobility , 2008, PerMIS.

[12]  Martial Hebert,et al.  Learning monocular reactive UAV control in cluttered natural environments , 2012, 2013 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[13]  Kenjiro Tadakuma,et al.  A Study of Leg-Type Landing Gear for Aerial Vehicles - Development of One Leg Model - , 2011, J. Robotics Mechatronics.

[14]  Danica Kragic,et al.  Experimental task analysis , 1997, Proceedings of International Conference on Robotics and Automation.