Data sharing for the advancement of science: Overcoming barriers for citizen scientists

Systematic study of data sharing by citizen scientists will make a significant contribution to science because of the growing importance of aggregated data in data‐intensive science. This article expands on the data sharing component of a paper presented at the 2013 ASIST conference. A three‐phase project is reported. Conducted between 2011 and 2013 within an environmental voluntary group, the Australian Plants Society Victoria (APSV), the interviews of the first phase are the major data source. Because the project revealed the importance of data sharing with professional scientists, their views are included in the literature review where four themes are explored: lack of shared disciplinary culture, trust, responsibility and controlled access to data, and describing data to enable reuse. The findings, presented under these themes, revealed that, within APSV, sharing among members is mostly generous and uninhibited. Beyond APSV, when online repositories were involved, barriers came very strongly into play. Trust was weaker and barriers also included issues of data quality, data description, and ownership and control. The conclusion is that further investigation of these barriers, including the attitudes of professional scientists to using data contributed by citizen scientists, would indicate how more extensive and useful data sharing could be achieved.

[1]  R. Primack,et al.  Uncovering, Collecting, and Analyzing Records to Investigate the Ecological Impacts of Climate Change: A Template from Thoreau's Concord , 2012 .

[2]  Ola Pilerot,et al.  LIS research on information sharing activities - people, places, or information , 2012, J. Documentation.

[3]  Martin Frické,et al.  The knowledge pyramid: a critique of the DIKW hierarchy , 2009, J. Inf. Sci..

[4]  C. Tenopir,et al.  Data Sharing by Scientists: Practices and Perceptions , 2011, PloS one.

[5]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  The analytic potential of scientific data: Understanding re-use value , 2011, ASIST.

[6]  Edmund A. Mennis The Wisdom of Crowds: Why the Many Are Smarter than the Few and How Collective Wisdom Shapes Business, Economies, Societies, and Nations , 2006 .

[7]  Reijo Savolainen Motives for giving information in non-work contexts and the expectations of reciprocity. The case of environmental activists , 2007, ASIST.

[8]  Mary Anne Kennan,et al.  Environmental voluntary groups: Towards curating data for sharing, access and preservation , 2013, ASIST.

[9]  WiedenbeckSusan,et al.  On-line trust , 2003 .

[10]  Christina L. Catlin-Groves The Citizen Science Landscape: From Volunteers to Citizen Sensors and Beyond , 2012 .

[11]  C. Macrae ‘Trust — the social virtues and the creation of prosperity’ , 2000 .

[12]  Rick Bonney,et al.  The history of public participation in ecological research , 2012 .

[13]  Geoffrey C. Bowker Biodiversity Datadiversity , 2000 .

[14]  Mary Anne Kennan,et al.  Wild data: Collaborative e-research and university libraries , 2012 .

[15]  Candie C. Wilderman,et al.  Public Participation in Scientific Research: Defining the Field and Assessing Its Potential for Informal Science Education. A CAISE Inquiry Group Report. , 2009 .

[16]  Lei Wu,et al.  Managing scientific data as public assets: Data sharing practices and policies among full‐time government employees , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[17]  Jenny Fry,et al.  Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[18]  John Weckert,et al.  Professionalism in the Information and Communication Technology Industry , 2013 .

[19]  Jennifer E. Rowley,et al.  Understanding trust formation in digital information sources: The case of Wikipedia , 2013, J. Inf. Sci..

[20]  B. Latour,et al.  Laboratory Life: The Construction of Scientific Facts , 1979 .

[21]  Mark G. Meekan,et al.  Acoustic Telemetry Validates a Citizen Science Approach for Monitoring Sharks on Coral Reefs , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  Anthony J. G. Hey,et al.  Jim Gray on eScience: a transformed scientific method , 2009, The Fourth Paradigm.

[23]  S. Fuller Knowledge: The Philosophical Quest in History , 2014 .

[24]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Analytic potential of data: assessing reuse value , 2011, JCDL '11.

[25]  G. Johanson,et al.  Multiple communities: Botanical data from citizen scientists for digital repositories , 2013 .

[26]  Michael Mitzenmacher,et al.  Detecting Novel Associations in Large Data Sets , 2011, Science.

[27]  K. Hambridge Action research. , 2000, Professional nurse.

[28]  Michael Witt,et al.  Data sharing, small science and institutional repositories , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[29]  Janice M Morse,et al.  Confusing Categories and Themes , 2008, Qualitative health research.

[30]  Miriam J. Metzger,et al.  The credibility of volunteered geographic information , 2008 .

[31]  Helen E. Roy,et al.  Understanding citizen science and environmental monitoring: final report on behalf of UK Environmental Observation Framework , 2012 .

[32]  S. Bell,et al.  What counts? Volunteers and their organisations in the recording and monitoring of biodiversity , 2008, Biodiversity and Conservation.

[33]  Kevin Crowston,et al.  Mechanisms for Data Quality and Validation in Citizen Science , 2011, 2011 IEEE Seventh International Conference on e-Science Workshops.

[34]  R. Putnam,et al.  Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. , 1994 .

[35]  S. Ferrier,et al.  Survey-gap analysis in expeditionary research: where do we go from here? , 2005 .

[36]  L. Bolman,et al.  Reframing Organizations: Artistry, Choice, and Leadership. Jossey-Bass Management Series, Social and Behavioral Science Series, and Higher and Adult Education Series. , 1991 .

[37]  Ola Pilerot,et al.  A practice theoretical exploration of information sharing and trust in a dispersed community of design scholars , 2013, Inf. Res..

[38]  A. Giddens Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age , 1992, The New Social Theory Reader.

[39]  Ola Pilerot,et al.  Making design researchers' information sharing visible through material objects , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[40]  Graham Pryor,et al.  Multi-scale Data Sharing in the Life Sciences: Some Lessons for Policy Makers , 2009, Int. J. Digit. Curation.

[41]  Kalpana Shankar,et al.  Data sharing in the sciences , 2011, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[42]  Sanna Talja,et al.  Information sharing in academic communities: Types and levels of collaboration in information seeking and use. , 2002 .

[43]  Kevin Quigley Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity , 1996 .

[44]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Big Data, Little Data, No Data: Scholarship in the Networked World , 2014 .

[45]  Kristin R. Eschenfelder,et al.  The Limits of sharing: Controlled data collections , 2011, ASIST.

[46]  David Haynes,et al.  Information Resource Description: Creating and Managing Metadata , 2013 .

[47]  Antoinette Weibel,et al.  Trust within and between Organizations. Conceptual Issues and Empirical Applications , 2003 .

[48]  T. D. Wilson,et al.  Information sharing: an exploration of the literature and some propositions , 2010, Inf. Res..

[49]  Ola Pilerot,et al.  Information sharing as a means to reach collective understanding: A study of design scholars' information practices , 2011, J. Documentation.

[50]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  The conundrum of sharing research data , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[51]  Jennifer Preece,et al.  Supporting content curation communities: The case of the Encyclopedia of Life , 2012, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[52]  H. Nissenbaum Securing Trust Online: Wisdom or Oxymoron? , 2015 .

[53]  Kevin S. Rioux,et al.  Examining information exchange and virtual communities: an emergent framework , 2007, Online Inf. Rev..

[54]  Tony Hey,et al.  The Fourth Paradigm: Data-Intensive Scientific Discovery , 2009 .

[55]  B. Cronin Scholarly communication and epistemic cultures , 2003 .

[56]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  What can Studies of e-Learning Teach us about Collaboration in e-Research? Some Findings from Digital Library Studies , 2005, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).