Characterization of PDZ domain–peptide interactions using an integrated protocol of QM/MM, PB/SA, and CFEA analyses

Protein–protein interactions, particularly weak and transient ones, are often mediated by peptide recognition domains. Characterizing the interaction interface of domain–peptide complexes and analyzing binding specificity for modular domains are critical for deciphering protein–protein interaction networks. In this article, we report the successful use of an integrated computational protocol to dissect the energetic profile and structural basis of peptide binding to third PDZ domain (PDZ3) from the PSD-95 protein. This protocol employs rigorous quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM), semi-empirical Poisson–Boltzmann/surface area (PB/SA), and empirical conformational free energy analysis (CFEA) to quantitatively describe and decompose systematic energy changes arising from, respectively, noncovalent interaction, desolvation effect, and conformational entropy loss associated with the formation of 30 affinity-known PDZ3–peptide complexes. We show that the QM/MM-, PB/SA-, and CFEA-derived energy components can work together fairly well in reproducing experimentally measured affinity after a linearly weighting treatment, albeit they are not compatible with each other directly. We also demonstrate that: (1) noncovalent interaction and desolvation effect donate, respectively, stability and specificity to complex architecture, while entropy loss contributes modestly to binding; (2) P0 and P−2 of peptide ligand are the most important positions for determining both the stability and specificity of the PDZ3–peptide complex, P−1 and P−3 can confer substantial stability (but not specificity) for the complex, and N-terminal P−4 and P−5 have only a very limited effect on binding.

[1]  M. Kennedy Origin of PDZ (DHR, GLGF) domains. , 1995, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[2]  N. Wong,et al.  Theoretical study on the bromomethane-water 1:2 complexes. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[3]  P. He,et al.  QM/MM Study of Epitope Peptides Binding to HLA‐A*0201: The Roles of Anchor Residues and Water , 2009, Chemical biology & drug design.

[4]  U. Omasits,et al.  Side chain substitution benchmark for peptide/MHC interaction , 2008, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[5]  Eamonn F. Healy,et al.  Development and use of quantum mechanical molecular models. 76. AM1: a new general purpose quantum mechanical molecular model , 1985 .

[6]  Anne Milet,et al.  Exploring the Binding of Inhibitors Derived from Tetrabromobenzimidazole to the CK2 Protein Using a QM/MM-PB/SA Approach , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[7]  Gavin MacBeath,et al.  Predicting PDZ domain–peptide interactions from primary sequences , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[8]  J. Richardson,et al.  Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  K. Morokuma,et al.  ONIOM: A Multilayered Integrated MO + MM Method for Geometry Optimizations and Single Point Energy Predictions. A Test for Diels−Alder Reactions and Pt(P(t-Bu)3)2 + H2 Oxidative Addition , 1996 .

[10]  J. Richardson,et al.  The penultimate rotamer library , 2000, Proteins.

[11]  M. Sanner,et al.  Reduced surface: an efficient way to compute molecular surfaces. , 1996, Biopolymers.

[12]  M. Spaller,et al.  Thermodynamic analysis of a hydrophobic binding site: probing the PDZ domain with nonproteinogenic peptide ligands. , 2004, Organic letters.

[13]  M. Sheng,et al.  PDZ Domains: Structural Modules for Protein Complex Assembly* , 2002, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[14]  Seth G. N. Grant,et al.  PDZ Domain Proteins: Plug and Play! , 2003, Science's STKE.

[15]  R. Russell,et al.  Peptide-mediated interactions in biological systems: new discoveries and applications. , 2008, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[16]  Satoko Hayashi,et al.  Atoms-in-molecules dual parameter analysis of weak to strong interactions: behaviors of electronic energy densities versus Laplacian of electron densities at bond critical points. , 2008, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[17]  Prisca Boisguerin,et al.  Quantification of PDZ domain specificity, prediction of ligand affinity and rational design of super-binding peptides. , 2004, Journal of molecular biology.

[18]  Chris Sander,et al.  A Specificity Map for the PDZ Domain Family , 2008, PLoS biology.

[19]  Kshatresh Dutta Dubey,et al.  Binding free energy calculation with QM/MM hybrid methods for Abl-Kinase inhibitor , 2011, Journal of biological physics.

[20]  K. Dev,et al.  Making protein interactions druggable: targeting PDZ domains , 2004, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[21]  Jiunn R Chen,et al.  PDZ Domain Binding Selectivity Is Optimized Across the Mouse Proteome , 2007, Science.

[22]  R. Bader Atoms in molecules : a quantum theory , 1990 .

[23]  Peng Zhou,et al.  Fluorine Bonding - How Does It Work In Protein-Ligand Interactions? , 2009, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[24]  Barry Honig,et al.  Extending the Applicability of the Nonlinear Poisson−Boltzmann Equation: Multiple Dielectric Constants and Multivalent Ions† , 2001 .

[25]  Nicole Caspers,et al.  A thermodynamic ligand binding study of the third PDZ domain (PDZ3) from the mammalian neuronal protein PSD-95. , 2007, Biochemistry.

[26]  Norberto Castillo,et al.  Characterization of a closed-shell fluorine-fluorine bonding interaction in aromatic compounds on the basis of the electron density. , 2005, The journal of physical chemistry. A.

[27]  M. Daly,et al.  A molecular-properties-based approach to understanding PDZ domain proteins and PDZ ligands. , 2006, Genome research.

[28]  F. Tian,et al.  Modeling and prediction of binding affinities between the human amphiphysin SH3 domain and its peptide ligands using genetic algorithm‐Gaussian processes , 2008, Biopolymers.

[29]  Eduardo Garcia Urdiales,et al.  Accurate Prediction of Peptide Binding Sites on Protein Surfaces , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[30]  L. Curtiss,et al.  Intermolecular interactions from a natural bond orbital, donor-acceptor viewpoint , 1988 .

[31]  C P Ponting,et al.  Evidence for PDZ domains in bacteria, yeast, and plants , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[32]  Roland L. Dunbrack,et al.  proteins STRUCTURE O FUNCTION O BIOINFORMATICS Improved prediction of protein side-chain conformations with SCWRL4 , 2022 .

[33]  M. Plesset,et al.  Note on an Approximation Treatment for Many-Electron Systems , 1934 .

[34]  F. Tian,et al.  Comprehensive comparison of eight statistical modelling methods used in quantitative structure-retention relationship studies for liquid chromatographic retention times of peptides generated by protease digestion of the Escherichia coli proteome. , 2009, Journal of chromatography. A.

[35]  Peng Zhou,et al.  2D depiction of nonbonding interactions for protein complexes , 2009, J. Comput. Chem..

[36]  L. Serrano,et al.  Protein-peptide interactions adopt the same structural motifs as monomeric protein folds. , 2009, Structure.

[37]  D. Case,et al.  Characterization of domain-peptide interaction interface: a case study on the amphiphysin-1 SH3 domain. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[38]  A. D. McLachlan,et al.  Solvation energy in protein folding and binding , 1986, Nature.

[39]  P. Kollman,et al.  Calculating structures and free energies of complex molecules: combining molecular mechanics and continuum models. , 2000, Accounts of chemical research.

[40]  Peng Zhou,et al.  Gaussian process: an alternative approach for QSAM modeling of peptides , 2008, Amino Acids.

[41]  F. Tian,et al.  Why OppA protein can bind sequence-independent peptides? A combination of QM/MM, PB/SA, and structure-based QSAR analyses , 2011, Amino Acids.

[42]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[43]  T. Gibson,et al.  Systematic Discovery of New Recognition Peptides Mediating Protein Interaction Networks , 2005, PLoS biology.

[44]  John H. Lewis,et al.  Crystal Structures of a Complexed and Peptide-Free Membrane Protein–Binding Domain: Molecular Basis of Peptide Recognition by PDZ , 1996, Cell.

[45]  T. Creamer Side‐chain conformational entropy in protein unfolded states , 2000, Proteins.

[46]  Corinna Cortes,et al.  Support-Vector Networks , 1995, Machine Learning.

[47]  Wei Zhang,et al.  A point‐charge force field for molecular mechanics simulations of proteins based on condensed‐phase quantum mechanical calculations , 2003, J. Comput. Chem..

[48]  F. Tian,et al.  Geometric characteristics of hydrogen bonds involving sulfur atoms in proteins , 2009, Proteins.

[49]  Jens Meiler,et al.  A physical model for PDZ-domain/peptide interactions , 2010, Journal of molecular modeling.