Brain volume estimation from serial section measurements: a comparison of methodologies

Estimation of brain volume from serial sections typically involves using a rectangular. Cavalieri's, parabolic (Simpson's), or a trapezoidal rule to integrate numerically a curve of cross-sectional area measurements plotted against section number. We practically compare the efficacy of each of these methods using mathematical simulations of regularly- and irregularly-shaped "brain volumes" as well as actual morphometric measures from brain regions. There are no meaningful differences between the various estimates when many sections are used--with fewer sections. Cavalieri's estimator is most accurate. This confirms previous theoretical reports demonstrating the efficiency and accuracy of the Cavalieri estimator of volume, particularly when few sections are analyzed. While the Cavalieri approach provides a better approximation of volume under some circumstances, it requires equally spaced sections. We therefore describe methods for the estimation of brain volume from unequally spaced sections, including an estimator based on the fitting of piece-wise parabolic curves to the data. We outline a series of guidelines for the use of these mathematical rules in the estimation of brain volume from serial sections.

[1]  M. Hofman Size and shape of the cerebral cortex in mammals. I. The cortical surface. , 1985, Brain, behavior and evolution.

[2]  P. Rakić,et al.  Elimination of neurons from the rhesus monkey's lateral geniculate nucleus during development , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[3]  P. Pasik,et al.  Early postnatal development of the monkey visual system. I. Growth of the lateral geniculate nucleus and striate cortex. , 1985, Brain research.

[4]  J. C. Wolford,et al.  Applied Numerical Methods for Digital Computation , 1985 .

[5]  A. Galaburda,et al.  The effect of developmental neuropathology on neocortical asymmetry in New Zealand black mice. , 1989, The International journal of neuroscience.

[6]  Philip Rabinowitz,et al.  Methods of Numerical Integration , 1985 .

[7]  W. Krieg Connections of the cerebral cortex. I. The albino rat. B. Structure of the cortical areas , 1946, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[8]  M. Hofman,et al.  Morphometry of size/volume variables and comparison of their bivariate relations in the nervous system under different conditions , 1986, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[9]  H J Gundersen,et al.  The efficiency of systematic sampling in stereology and its prediction * , 1987, Journal of microscopy.

[10]  Luis M. Cruz-Orive Estimating volumes from systematic hyperplane sections , 1985 .

[11]  J. van Pelt,et al.  Sex-difference and left-right asymmetries in the prefrontal cortex during postnatal development in the rat. , 1984, Brain research.

[12]  W. Krieg Connections of the cerebral cortex. I. The albino rat. A. Topography of the cortical areas , 1946 .

[13]  P. Rakic,et al.  Three‐dimensional counting: An accurate and direct method to estimate numbers of cells in sectioned material , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[14]  Michel A. Hofman,et al.  Size and Shape of the Cerebral Cortex in Mammals (Part 1 of 2) , 1985 .

[15]  E. Fliers,et al.  Morphometric analysis of the suprachiasmatic and paraventricular nuclei in the human brain: sex differences and age-dependent changes. , 1988, Journal of anatomy.