Optimal charging of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles in smart grids

Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) play an important role in making a greener future. Given a group of PHEVs distributed across a power network equipped with the smart grid technology (e.g. wireless communication devices), the objective of this paper is to study how to schedule the charging of the PHEV batteries. To this end, we assume that each battery must be fully charged by a pre-specified time, and that the charging rate can be time-varying at discrete-time instants. The scheduling problem for the PHEV charging can be augmented into the optimal power flow (OPF) problem to obtain a joint OPF-charging (dynamic) optimization. A solution to this highly nonconvex problem optimizes the network performance by minimizing the generation and charging costs while satisfying the network, physical and inelastic-load constraints. A global optimum to the joint OPF-charging optimization can be found efficiently in polynomial time by solving its convex dual problem whenever the duality gap is zero for the joint OPF-charging problem. It is shown in a recent work that the duality gap is expected to be zero for the classical OPF problem. We build on this result and prove that the duality gap is zero for the joint OPF-charging optimization if it is zero for the classical OPF problem. The results of this work are applied to the IEEE 14 bus system.

[1]  A.L. Dimeas,et al.  A MAS architecture for microgrids control , 2005, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on, Intelligent Systems Application to Power Systems.

[2]  Craig H Stephan,et al.  Environmental and energy implications of plug-in hybrid-electric vehicles. , 2008, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  Hsiao-Dong Chiang,et al.  Power-current hybrid rectangular formulation for interior-point optimal power flow , 2009 .

[4]  K. Pandya,et al.  A SURVEY OF OPTIMAL POWER FLOW , 2008 .

[5]  Philip N. Overholt Department of Energy/University research: A smart partnership for a smart grid , 2009, 2009 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[6]  John D. Kueck,et al.  Distribution System of the Future , 2003 .

[7]  Robert J. Thomas,et al.  MATPOWER's extensible optimal power flow architecture , 2009, 2009 IEEE Power & Energy Society General Meeting.

[8]  R. Adapa,et al.  A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993. II. Newton, linear programming and interior point methods , 1999 .

[9]  James A. Momoh,et al.  Smart grid design for efficient and flexible power networks operation and control , 2009, 2009 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition.

[10]  Victor H. Quintana,et al.  Optimal power flow by a nonlinear complementarity method , 1999, Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Power Industry Computer Applications. Connecting Utilities. PICA 99. To the Millennium and Beyond (Cat. No.99CH36351).

[11]  Zoran Filipi,et al.  Environmental assessment of plug-in hybrid electric vehicles using naturalistic drive cycles and vehicle travel patterns: A Michigan case study , 2013 .

[12]  Javad Lavaei Zero duality gap for classical opf problem convexifies fundamental nonlinear power problems , 2011, Proceedings of the 2011 American Control Conference.

[13]  Javad Lavaei,et al.  Convexification of optimal power flow problem , 2010, 2010 48th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[14]  R. Adapa,et al.  A review of selected optimal power flow literature to 1993. I. Nonlinear and quadratic programming approaches , 1999 .

[15]  R. N. Elliott,et al.  American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy , 2002 .