An Institutional Analysis of Pluralistic Responses to Enterprise System Implementations

Organizations are awash in a wide range of practices that are guided by a variety of goals, values, assumptions, and identities. New enterprise systems are consistent with many of these practices, yet conflict with others. Using institutional theory, we show how the congruence with the institutional logics associated with an ERP implementation affects the local responses to the system. This institutional logic is often accompanied by strong institutional pressures whereby actors can respond either with strategies of acquiescence such as compliance or mutual adaptation, or with loose coupling strategies of compromise and avoidance. We conducted a qualitative meta-analysis of eighteen published case studies of ERP implementations. The results support our theoretical conjectures. The findings suggest that situations involving loose coupling call to question the validity of enterprise system data. We also highlight the limited role of resistance strategies as viable long-term responses.

[1]  Pierre Bourdieu,et al.  Outline of a Theory of Practice , 2020, On Violence.

[2]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[3]  James Cornford,et al.  ERP systems and the university as a "unique" organisation , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[4]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Accounting for the Contradictory Organizational Consequences of Information Technology: Theoretical Directions and Methodological Implications , 1999, Inf. Syst. Res..

[5]  J. Law.  A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology, and domination , 1991 .

[6]  C. Oliver.  STRATEGIC RESPONSES TO INSTITUTIONAL PROCESSES , 1991 .

[7]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[8]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective , 1996, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations , 1994, TOIS.

[10]  S. Newell,et al.  Networks, Knowledge and Power: Decision Making, Politics and the Process of Innovation , 2000 .

[11]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Panoptic empowerment and reflective conformity in enterprise systems-enabled organizations , 2005, Inf. Organ..

[12]  Colin Crouch,et al.  Breaking the Path of Institutional Development? Alternatives to the New Determinism , 2004 .

[13]  Jeanne W. Ross,et al.  Learning to Implement Enterprise Systems: An Exploratory Study of the Dialectics of Change , 2002, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Sue Newell,et al.  'Best' for whom?: the tension between 'best practice' ERP packages and diverse epistemic cultures in a university context , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[15]  M. Markus,et al.  The Enterprise System Experience— From Adoption to Success , 2000 .

[16]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  Deconstructing information packages: Organizational and behavioural implications of ERP systems , 2004, Inf. Technol. People.

[17]  Steven H. Lopez.  The New Old Economy: Networks, Institutions, and the Organizational Transformation of American Manufacturing , 2007 .

[18]  T. Davenport.  Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[19]  A. Kellerman,et al.  The Constitution of Society : Outline of the Theory of Structuration , 2015 .

[20]  Peter A. Bamberger,et al.  The Organizational Transformation Process: The Micropolitics of Dissonance Reduction and the Allignment of Logics of Action , 1996 .

[21]  Juliet Webster,et al.  Advanced Manufacturing Technologies: Work Organisation and Social Relations Crystallised , 1990 .

[22]  John W. Meyer,et al.  Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony , 1977, American Journal of Sociology.

[23]  E. Wenger.  Communities of practice: learning as a social system , 1998 .

[24]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  When success turns into failure: a package-driven business process re-engineering project in the financial services industry , 1999, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[25]  A. Boonstra.  Information systems and organizational change , 2002 .

[26]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Technology and Institutions: What Can Research on Information Technology and Research on Organizations Learn from Each Other? , 2001, MIS Q..

[27]  Sanjay Gosain,et al.  Enterprise Information Systems as Objects and Carriers of Institutional Forces: The New Iron Cage? , 2004, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Henk Akkermans,et al.  Vicious and virtuous cycles in ERP implementation: a case study of interrelations between critical success factors , 2002, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[29]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Misalignments in ERP Implementation: A Dialectic Perspective , 2003, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[30]  J. Goodstein.  Institutional Pressures and Strategic Responsiveness: Employer Involvement in Work-Family Issues , 1994 .

[31]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  A Multilevel Model of Resistance to Information Technology Implementation , 2005, MIS Q..

[32]  Erica L. Wagner,et al.  Networks, negotiations, and new times: the implementation of enterprise resource planning into an academic administration , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[33]  R. Friedland.  Bringing Society Back In : Symbols, Practices, and Institutional Contradictions , 1991 .

[34]  Sten Jönsson.  Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[35]  Gerald R. Salancik,et al.  Organizational Discretion in Responding to Institutional Practices: Hospitals and Cesarean Births , 1996 .

[36]  Elliot Bendoly,et al.  Order Lead-time Improvement Following Enterprise-IT Implementation: An Empirical Study , 2005 .

[37]  Jonathan P. Allen.  Value conflicts in enterprise systems , 2005, Inf. Technol. People.

[38]  Lucas D. Introna.  Management, information and power: A narrative of the involved manager , 1997 .

[39]  David Collier,et al.  Sources of Leverage in Causal Inference: Toward an Alternative View of Methodology , 2004 .

[40]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1992 .

[41]  Diane M. Strong,et al.  Understanding enterprise systems-enabled integration , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[42]  Kenneth L. Kraemer,et al.  Institutional Factors in Information Technology Innovation , 1994, Inf. Syst. Res..

[43]  Knut H. Rolland,et al.  Balancing the Local and the Global in Infrastructural Information Systems , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[44]  Steve Sawyer,et al.  Temporal Issues in Information and Communication Technology-Enabled Organizational Change: Evidence From an Enterprise Systems Implementation , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[45]  Eric T. G. Wang,et al.  Understanding misalignment and cascading change of ERP implementation: a stage view of process analysis , 2005, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[46]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Enterprise resource planning (ERP) systems as a technology of power: empowerment or panoptic control? , 2002, DATB.

[47]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  Capturing the Complexity in Advanced Technology Use: Adaptive Structuration Theory , 1994 .

[48]  Leonard A. Steverson.  Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards , 2005 .

[49]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology Adaptation: The Case of a Computer-Supported Inter-Organizational Virtual Team , 2000, MIS Q..

[50]  Patricia H. Thornton.  The Rise of the Corporation in a Craft Industry: Conflict and Conformity in Institutional Logics , 2002 .

[51]  Michael D. Myers,et al.  Dominant actors, political agendas, and strategic shifts over time: a critical ethnography of an enterprise systems implementation , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[52]  Sue Newell,et al.  Implementing enterprise resource planning and knowledge management systems in tandem: fostering efficiency and innovation complementarity , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[53]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Power and Information Technology Research: A Metatriangulation Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[54]  S. Newell,et al.  Repairing ERP , 2006 .

[55]  Qing Hu,et al.  Assimilation of Enterprise Systems: The Effect of Institutional Pressures and the Mediating Role of Top Management , 2007, MIS Q..

[56]  S. Barley.  Technology as an occasion for structuring: evidence from observations of CT scanners and the social order of radiology departments. , 1986, Administrative science quarterly.

[57]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  An institutional perspective on sources of ERP package-organisation misalignments , 2004, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[58]  J. Fleck.  Learning by trying: the implementation of configurational technology☆ , 1994 .

[59]  W. Powell,et al.  The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis , 1993 .

[60]  L. L. Cummings,et al.  Strategic Response to Institutional Influences on Information Systems Outsourcing , 1997 .

[61]  Jinyoul Lee,et al.  An ERP implementation case study from a knowledge transfer perspective , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[62]  Kristin Braa,et al.  The control devolution: ERP and the side effects of globalization , 2001, DATB.

[63]  Antonio Cordella,et al.  Global and local dynamics in infrastructure deployment: the Astra Hassle experience , 2000 .

[64]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Technology adaption: the case of a computer-supported inter-organizational virtual team 1 , 2000 .

[65]  Amany R. Elbanna,et al.  From Control to Drift: The Dynamics of Corporate Information Infrastructures , 2001 .

[66]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[67]  R. Nisbett,et al.  Culture and Cognition , 2002 .

[68]  Terri L. Griffith.  Technology Features as Triggers for Sensemaking , 1999 .

[69]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems failures—a survey and classification of the empirical literature , 1988 .

[70]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Learning from adopters' experiences with ERP: problems encountered and success achieved , 2000, J. Inf. Technol..

[71]  Henry C. Lucas,et al.  Implementing Packaged Software , 1987, MIS Q..

[72]  D. Leonard-Barton,et al.  Implementation as mutual adaptation of technology and organization , 1988 .