A Choice Experiment Approach to the Valuation of Mortality

This paper presents an integrated framework for evaluating the reduction of several types of mortality risk using a Choice Experiment (CE) approach, a type of stated preference technique. Using this approach, we can distinguish the marginal willingness to pay (MWTP) for the amount of risk reduction from the MWTP for the opportunity of risk reduction and therefore calculate the “Quantity-based” Value of a Statistical Life. The risks in our survey include mortality risks due to accident, cancer, and heart disease. The Quantity-based VSL is calculated to be 350 million JPY (in 2002 Japanese Yen, about 2.9 million US dollars). Furthermore, we analyzed the influence of subjective risk perception and population characteristics of the respondents on their MWTP. Estimated results suggest that it is unnecessary to adjust the VSL according to the differences in the type of risk if the VSL is calculated using an adequate approach. However, adjustments for the timing of risk reduction and population characteristics are found to be significant for the execution of benefit transfer.

[1]  Lan Savage,et al.  An empirical investigation into the effect of psychological perceptions on the willingness-to-pay to reduce risk , 1993 .

[2]  D. Hensher,et al.  Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications , 2000 .

[3]  Michael Jones-Lee,et al.  The Value of Changes in the Probability of Death or Injury , 1974, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  James K. Hammitt,et al.  Effects of Disease Type and Latency on the Value of Mortality Risk , 2003 .

[5]  Anna Alberini,et al.  Does the Value of a Statistical Life Vary with Age and Health Status? Evidence from the United States and Canada , 2004 .

[6]  P. Corso,et al.  Valuing Mortality-Risk Reduction: Using Visual Aids to Improve the Validity of Contingent Valuation , 2001 .

[7]  I. Krinsky,et al.  On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities , 1986 .

[8]  Joel Huber,et al.  A Reference Lottery Metric for Valuing Health , 1996 .

[9]  Joseph S. Pliskin,et al.  The Economic Value of Changing Mortality Probabilities: A Decision-Theoretic Approach , 1980 .

[10]  W. Viscusi,et al.  The value of risks to life and health , 1993 .

[11]  James K. Hammitt,et al.  Survival is a Luxury Good: The Increasing Value of a Statistical Life , 2000 .

[12]  Joseph E. Aldy,et al.  The Value of a Statistical Life: A Critical Review of Market Estimates Throughout the World , 2003 .

[13]  M. Cropper,et al.  Public Choices Between Life Saving Programs: The Tradeoff Between Qualitative Factors and Lives Saved , 2000 .

[14]  Ron Goeree,et al.  Age, Health and the Willingness to Pay for Mortality Risk Reductions: A Contingent Valuation Survey of Ontario Residents , 2002 .

[15]  T L McDaniels,et al.  Risk perception and the value of safety. , 1992, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[16]  J. Graham,et al.  Willingness to Pay for Health Protection: Inadequate Sensitivity to Probability? , 1999 .

[17]  M. Hammerton,et al.  THE VALUE OF SAFETY: RESULTS OF A NATIONAL SAMPLE SURVEY. IN: URBAN TRANSPORT , 1985 .

[18]  M. Jones-Lee,et al.  Scale and context effects in the valuation of transport safety , 1995 .

[19]  D. McFadden.  Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior , 1972 .