Minimization of Product Utility Estimation Errors in Recommender Result Set Evaluations

Recommender systems are wide-spread web applications which can effectively support users in finding suitable products in a large and/or complex product domain. Although state-of-the-art systems manage to accomplish the task of finding and presenting suitable products they show big deficits in the applied model of human behavior. Time limitations, cognitive capacities, and willingness to cognitive effort bound rational decision taking which can lead to unforeseen side effects and furthermore to sub-optimal decisions. Decoy effects are cognitive phenomenons which are omni-present on result pages. State-of-the-art recommender systems are completely unaware of such effects. Due to the fact that such effects constitute one source of irrational decisions their identification and, if necessary, the neutralization of their biasing potential is extremely important. This paper introduces an approach for identifying and minimizing decoy effects on recommender result pages. To undergird the presented approach we present the results of a corresponding user study which clearly proofs the concept.

[1]  A. Tversky,et al.  Context-dependent preferences , 1993 .

[2]  Gerhard Friedrich,et al.  An Integrated Environment for the Development of Knowledge-Based Recommender Applications , 2006, Int. J. Electron. Commer..

[3]  Robin D. Burke,et al.  Hybrid Recommender Systems: Survey and Experiments , 2002, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[4]  Dan Ariely,et al.  Seeking Subjective Dominance in Multidimensional Space: An Explanation of the Asymmetric Dominance Effect , 1995 .

[5]  Gerald Häubl,et al.  Running Head : PROCESSES OF PREFERENCE CONSTRUCTION Processes of Preference Construction in Agent-Assisted Online Shopping , 2002 .

[6]  H. Simon,et al.  A Behavioral Model of Rational Choice , 1955 .

[7]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[8]  Alexander Felfernig,et al.  Asymmetric Dominance- and Compromise Effects in the Financial Services Domain , 2009, 2009 IEEE Conference on Commerce and Enterprise Computing.

[9]  D. Kahneman Maps of Bounded Rationality: Psychology for Behavioral Economics , 2003 .

[10]  David L. Schwarzkopf The Effects of Attraction on Investment Decisions , 2003 .

[11]  Valerie J. Trifts,et al.  Consumer Decision Making in Online Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids , 2000 .

[12]  John Riedl,et al.  Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations , 2000, CSCW '00.

[13]  A. Felfernig,et al.  A Short Survey of Recommendation Technologies in Travel and Tourism , 2006 .

[14]  Christian Schmitt,et al.  Multivariate Preference Models and Decision Making with the MAUT Machine , 2003, User Modeling.

[15]  Alexander Felfernig,et al.  Knowledge-Based Recommender Technologies for Marketing and Sales , 2007, Int. J. Pattern Recognit. Artif. Intell..

[16]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[17]  J. Townsend,et al.  Decision field theory: a dynamic-cognitive approach to decision making in an uncertain environment. , 1993, Psychological review.

[18]  Alexander Felfernig,et al.  Der Asymmetrische Dominanzeffekt und seine Bedeutung für E-Tourismus-Plattformen , 2009, Wirtschaftsinformatik.

[19]  Michael J. Pazzani,et al.  Learning and Revising User Profiles: The Identification of Interesting Web Sites , 1997, Machine Learning.

[20]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[21]  Alexander Felfernig,et al.  Calculating Decoy Items in Utility-Based Recommendation , 2009, IEA/AIE.

[22]  Maria Giovanna Devetag From utilities to mental models: A critical survey on decision rules and cognition in consumer choice , 1999 .