ROC study of the effect of stereoscopic imaging on assessment of breast lesions.

An observer performance study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of assessing breast lesion characteristics with stereomammography. Stereoscopic image pairs of 158 breast biopsy tissue specimens were acquired with a GE Senographe 2000D full field digital mammography system using a 1.8x magnification geometry. A phantom-shift method equivalent to a stereo shift angle of +/- 3 degrees relative to a central axis perpendicular to the detector was used. For each specimen, two pairs of stereo images were taken at approximately orthogonal orientations. The specimens contained either a mass, microcalcifications, both, or normal tissue. Based on pathological analysis, 39.9% of the specimens were found to contain malignancy. The digital specimen radiographs were displayed on a high resolution MegaScan CRT monitor driven by a DOME stereo display board using in-house developed software. Five MQSA radiologists participated as observers. Each observer read the 316 specimen stereo image pairs in a randomized order. For each case, the observer first read the monoscopic image and entered his/her confidence ratings on the presence of microcalcifications and/or masses, margin status, BI-RADS assessment, and the likelihood of malignancy. The corresponding stereoscopic images were then displayed on the same monitor and were viewed through stereoscopic LCD glasses. The observer was free to change the ratings in every category after stereoscopic reading. The ratings of the observers were analyzed by ROC methodology. For the 5 MQSA radiologists, the average Az value for estimation of the likelihood of malignancy of the lesions improved from 0.70 for monoscopic reading to 0.72 (p=0.04) after stereoscopic reading, and the average Az value for the presence of microcalcifications improved from 0.95 to 0.96 (p=0.02). The Az value for the presence of masses improved from 0.80 to 0.82 after stereoscopic reading, but the difference fell short of statistical significance (p=0.08). The visual assessment of margin clearance was found to have very low correlation with microscopic analysis with or without stereoscopic reading. This study demonstrates the potential of using stereomammography to improve the detection and characterization of mammographic lesions.

[1]  F. Mettler,et al.  Cost-effectiveness of stereoscopic radiographs in detection of lung nodules. , 1982, Radiology.

[2]  Carl J. D'Orsi,et al.  Stereoscopic digital mammography: improving detection and diagnosis of breast cancer , 2001, CARS.

[3]  C J D'Orsi,et al.  Evaluation of linear and nonlinear tomosynthetic reconstruction methods in digital mammography. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[4]  Andrew D. A. Maidment,et al.  Effects of quantum noise and binocular summation on dose requirements in stereoradiography. , 2003, Medical physics.

[5]  H. Chan,et al.  Effects of magnification and zooming on depth perception in digital stereomammography: an observer performance study. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[6]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. , 2001, Radiology.

[7]  R. C. Murry,et al.  Christensen's physics of diagnostic radiology , 1990 .

[8]  Dd Dorfman,et al.  ROC rating analysis : generalization to the population of readers and cases with the jackknife method , 1992 .

[9]  J. Ragnarsson,et al.  Factors Influencing Postoperative Movement in Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures: Evaluation by Conventional Radiography and Stereoradiography , 1980, Journal of orthopaedic trauma.

[10]  R. Bird,et al.  Analysis of cancers missed at screening mammography. , 1992, Radiology.

[11]  M. Wallis,et al.  A review of false negative mammography in a symptomatic population. , 1991, Clinical radiology.

[12]  M M Goodsitt,et al.  Stereomammography: evaluation of depth perception using a virtual 3D cursor. , 2000, Medical physics.

[13]  K. Doi,et al.  X-ray imaging of blood vessels to the brain by use of magnification stereoscopic technique. , 1981, Advances in neurology.

[14]  R. Hendrick,et al.  Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. , 1993, Radiology.

[15]  D. Kopans,et al.  Digital tomosynthesis in breast imaging. , 1997, Radiology.

[16]  Heang-Ping Chan,et al.  The effects of stereo shift angle, geometric magnification and display zoom on depth measurements in digital stereomammography. , 2002, Medical physics.

[17]  Y Higashida,et al.  Depth determination on stereoscopic digital subtraction angiograms. , 1988, Radiology.

[18]  William Wells,et al.  Detection of prostate cancer by integration of line-scan diffusion, T2-mapping and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging; a multichannel statistical classifier. , 2003, Medical physics.

[19]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  High resolution CT mammography of surgical biopsy specimens. , 1996, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[20]  K. An,et al.  A biplanar cephalometric stereoradiography technique. , 1990, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[21]  J M Boone,et al.  Determination of the presampled MTF in computed tomography. , 2001, Medical physics.

[22]  K Doi,et al.  Detectability of depth information by use of magnification stereoscopic technique in cerebral angiography. , 1983, Radiology.