Electroencephalographic activity over temporal brain areas during phonological encoding in picture naming

OBJECTIVES The present study examined electroencephalographic (EEG) correlates of phonological encoding during picture naming with special emphasis on hemispheric asymmetries of these EEG correlates. We also examined whether a small set of stimuli was sufficient to study the phonological encoding, and to what extent the complexity of the produced message affects the EEG responses. METHODS Event-related electrical brain activity during the covert and overt production of names and nominal phrases derived from 16 variants from 4 different pictures was compared with that during passive viewing of the same pictures. RESULTS Topographical and source analyses of the differential EEG activity (naming versus passive viewing) indicated that the N1 and P2 components of the visual evoked potential resulted from the same brain areas, but were activated stronger during naming as compared to passive viewing. In contrast, the differential EEG activity from 275 to 400 ms suggested the involvement of additional brain areas during naming with more pronounced left- than right-hemispheric activation in middle and posterior temporal regions for both overt and covert naming. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest the involvement of Wernicke's area in the phonological encoding of a message during speech production, which can even be obtained with a small set of pictures and a large number of repetitions.

[1]  S. Bookheimer,et al.  Regional cerebral blood flow during object naming and word reading , 1995 .

[2]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  An MEG Study of Picture Naming , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[3]  A. Paivio,et al.  Cognitive components of picture naming. , 1996, Psychological bulletin.

[4]  D. Stuss,et al.  Event-related potentials during naming and mental rotation. , 1983, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[5]  Thomas Elbert,et al.  Differential outcomes from magneto- and electroencephalography for the analysis of human cognition , 1997, Neuroscience Letters.

[6]  R. C. Oldfield.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  From objects to names: A cognitive neuroscience approach , 1999, Psychological research.

[8]  R. Hari,et al.  Dynamics of brain activation during picture naming , 1994, Nature.

[9]  P Berg,et al.  A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. , 1994, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[10]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  The Neural Substrate of Picture Naming , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[11]  C. Michel,et al.  Linear inverse solutions with optimal resolution kernels applied to electromagnetic tomography , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[12]  Leslie G. Ungerleider.  Functional Brain Imaging Studies of Cortical Mechanisms for Memory , 1995, Science.

[13]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[14]  G. Waters,et al.  PET Studies of Syntactic Processing with Auditory Sentence Presentation , 1999, NeuroImage.

[15]  G. Ojemann,et al.  Cortical language localization in left, dominant hemisphere. An electrical stimulation mapping investigation in 117 patients. , 1989, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  M. Eimer.  An event-related potential (ERP) study of transient and sustained visual attention to color and form , 1997, Biological Psychology.

[17]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[18]  T W Picton,et al.  Searching for the names of pictures: an event-related potential study. , 1986, Psychophysiology.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  The neural regions sustaining object recognition and naming , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.