Progressive Delamination Analysis of Stiffened Composite Panels in Post-Buckling

Simple specimens in unidirectional graphite-epoxy material are investigated. They consist of a skin panel with one stiffener, where the stiffener is L-shaped and is bonded to the skin. Two undamaged specimens and three specimens with an initial separation between the stringer flange and the skin in the middle of the stringer are tested under axial compression. The compression load leads the panels to buckle, and the resulting out-of-plane deformation causes progressive debonding between the skin and the stringer. The skin-stringer separation is measured directly during the tests by means of an ultrasonic system obtaining C-scan and B-scan representations at different load steps. The tests are numerically analyzed using the finite element code ABAQUS, modeling the entire stiffened panel by fournodes shell elements, and investigating the progressive delamination by means of the Virtual Crack Closure Technique. The results of the numerical analyses are compared to the experimental ones in terms of load-shortening curves, post-buckling shapes and progressive debonding between the skin and the stringer.

[1]  Chiara Bisagni,et al.  Experiments and Analyses on Post-Buckling Behavior of Stringer-Stiffened Laminated Composite Helicopter Tailplane , 2005 .

[2]  Chiara Bisagni,et al.  Buckling Behavior of Composite Laminated Stiffened Panels Under Combined Shear and Axial Compression , 2005 .

[3]  Pedro P. Camanho,et al.  Failure Criteria for FRP Laminates , 2005 .

[4]  Chiara Bisagni,et al.  Testing of Stiffened Composite Cylindrical Shells in the Postbuckling Range Until Failure , 2004 .

[5]  Mark W. Hilburger,et al.  Progressive failure analyses of compression-loaded composite curved panels with and without cutouts , 2004 .

[6]  Haim Abramovich,et al.  Experiments on Axial Compression Postbuckling Behavior of Stiffened Cylindrical Composite Panels , 2003 .

[7]  P. D. Soden,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES OF CURRENT FAILURE THEORIES FOR COMPOSITE LAMINATES, JUDGED AGAINST EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE , 2002 .

[8]  Murray L. Scott,et al.  The analysis of skin-to-stiffener debonding in composite aerospace structures , 2002 .

[9]  R. S. Thomson,et al.  Modelling delaminations in postbuckling stiffened composite shear panels , 2000 .

[10]  Johann Arbocz,et al.  Buckling experiments : experimental methods in buckling of thin-walled structures , 2000 .

[11]  P. D. Soden,et al.  Predicting failure in composite laminates: the background to the exercise , 1998 .

[12]  P. D. Soden,et al.  A COMPARISON OF THE PREDICTIVE CAPABILITIES OF CURRENT FAILURE THEORIES FOR COMPOSITE LAMINATES , 1998 .

[13]  James H. Starnes,et al.  Future directions and challenges in shell stability analysis , 1997 .

[14]  Fu-Kuo Chang,et al.  Damage Tolerance of Laminated Composites Containing an Open Hole and Subjected to Compressive Loadings: Part I—Analysis , 1991 .

[15]  Chiara Bisagni,et al.  Numerical analysis and experimental correlation of composite shell buckling and post-buckling , 2000 .

[16]  Ben L. Di Vito,et al.  The NASA STI Program Office provides , 1997 .