Performance Monitoring and Measurement Techniques for Coherent Optical Systems

Modern spectrally efficient optical communication systems utilize polarization-multiplexed coherent transmission in complex modulation format. Coherent receivers used in these systems measure the amplitude and phase of the optical signals for both orthogonally polarized components carrying information. Knowledge of the amplitude and phase of the optical field, in combination with digital signal processing, gives the receiver an inherent metrology and performance monitoring capability. As the optical signal propagates from the transmitter over optical fiber to the receiver, a signal transformation and degradation is expected. The receiver observes the properties of the transmitted optical signal as degraded by the impairments of the transmission medium. The details of monitoring optical signal parameters and link impairments are the focus of this paper. The optical signal parameters include polarization state and residual carrier phase; optical link impairments include chromatic dispersion and polarization mode dispersion. Two distinct techniques are presented: one based on Stokes space analysis, and the other on Kalman filtering. The Stokes space techniques are modulation-format independent and do not require demodulation. The Kalman filtering provides optimal estimation of the physical quantities that describe the optical signal and the optical medium.

[1]  B. Szafraniec,et al.  Polarization demultiplexing in Stokes space. , 2010, Optics express.

[2]  Xiang Zhou,et al.  Ultra-High-Capacity DWDM transmission system for 100G and beyond , 2010, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[3]  Richard A. Brown,et al.  Introduction to random signals and applied kalman filtering (3rd ed , 2012 .

[4]  Norbert Wiener,et al.  Extrapolation, Interpolation, and Smoothing of Stationary Time Series , 1964 .

[5]  T. Hoshida,et al.  Polarization demultiplexing based on independent component analysis in optical coherent receivers , 2008, 2008 34th European Conference on Optical Communication.

[6]  T. Duthel,et al.  Optical Performance Monitoring using a 43Gb/s realtime coherent receiver , 2009, 2009 IEEE/LEOS Summer Topical Meeting.

[7]  C. Brosseau Fundamentals of Polarized Light: A Statistical Optics Approach , 1998 .

[8]  S. Bigo,et al.  Will 100 Gb/s resist higher bit rates? , 2011, 2011 37th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication.

[9]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[10]  Floyd M. Gardner,et al.  A BPSK/QPSK Timing-Error Detector for Sampled Receivers , 1986, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[11]  R.A. Shafik,et al.  On the Extended Relationships Among EVM, BER and SNR as Performance Metrics , 2006, 2006 International Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering.

[12]  Seb J Savory,et al.  Digital filters for coherent optical receivers. , 2008, Optics express.

[13]  T. Duthel,et al.  Performance monitoring using coherent receivers , 2009, 2009 Conference on Optical Fiber Communication - incudes post deadline papers.

[14]  R. Clark Jones,et al.  A New Calculus for the Treatment of Optical Systems. VII. Properties of the N-Matrices , 1948 .

[15]  S. Haykin,et al.  Adaptive Filter Theory , 1986 .

[16]  R. Jones A New Calculus for the Treatment of Optical SystemsI. Description and Discussion of the Calculus , 1941 .

[17]  M. Winter,et al.  Error Vector Magnitude as a Performance Measure for Advanced Modulation Formats , 2012, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[18]  J. Treichler,et al.  A new approach to multipath correction of constant modulus signals , 1983 .

[19]  B. Szafraniec Performance monitoring and measurement techniques for coherent systems , 2012, OFC/NFOEC.

[20]  Pierpaolo Boffi,et al.  PDM-16QAM transmission performance over uncompensated fiber links. , 2011, Optics express.

[21]  R. Jones A New Calculus for the Treatment of Optical Systems. IV. , 1942 .

[22]  F.N. Hauske,et al.  Precise, robust and least complexity CD estimation , 2011, 2011 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[23]  Bernd Nebendahl,et al.  Kalman filter carrier and polarization-state tracking. , 2010, Optics letters.

[24]  B. Lankl,et al.  Optical Performance Monitoring in Digital Coherent Receivers , 2009, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[25]  N. S. Bergano,et al.  Polarization dispersion and principal states in a 147-km undersea lightwave cable , 1988 .

[26]  B. Szafraniec,et al.  Elementary Matrix Method for Dispersion Analysis in Optical Systems , 2010, Journal of Lightwave Technology.