An improved method for simulating microcalcifications in digital mammograms.

The assessment of the performance of a digital mammography system requires an observer study with a relatively large number of cases with known truth which is often difficult to assemble. Several investigators have developed methods for generating hybrid abnormal images containing simulated microcalcifications. This article addresses some of the limitations of earlier methods. The new method is based on digital images of needle biopsy specimens. Since the specimens are imaged separately from the breast, the microcalcification attenuation profile scan is deduced without the effects of over and underlying tissues. The resulting templates are normalized for image acquisition specific parameters and reprocessed to simulate microcalcifications appropriate to other imaging systems, with different x-ray, detector and image processing parameters than the original acquisition system. This capability is not shared by previous simulation methods that have relied on extracting microcalcifications from breast images. The method was validated by five experienced mammographers who compared 59 pairs of simulated and real microcalcifications in a two-alternative forced choice task designed to test if they could distinguish the real from the simulated lesions. They also classified the shapes of the microcalcifications according to a standardized clinical lexicon. The observed probability of correct choice was 0.415, 95% confidence interval (0.284, 0.546), showing that the radiologists were unable to distinguish the lesions. The shape classification revealed substantial agreement with the truth (mean kappa = 0.70), showing that we were able to accurately simulate the lesion morphology. While currently limited to single microcalcifications, the method is extensible to more complex clusters of microcalcifications and to three-dimensional images. It can be used to objectively assess an imaging technology, especially with respect to its ability to adequately visualize the morphology of the lesions, which is a critical factor in the benign versus malignant classification of a lesion detected in screening mammography.

[1]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Simulation of mammographic lesions. , 2006, Academic radiology.

[2]  Arthur E. Burgess,et al.  Producing lesions for hybrid mammograms: extracted tumors and simulated microcalcifications , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[3]  K. Muller,et al.  Improving the detection of simulated masses in mammograms through two different image-processing techniques. , 2001, Academic radiology.

[4]  J. Stines.  BI-RADS: use in the French radiologic community. How to overcome with some difficulties. , 2007, European journal of radiology.

[5]  R Di Paola,et al.  A simulation model of clustered breast microcalcifications. , 1994, Medical physics.

[6]  Jacob Cohen.  A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales , 1960 .

[7]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Components-of-variance models and multiple-bootstrap experiments: an alternative method for random-effects, receiver operating characteristic analysis. , 2000, Academic radiology.

[8]  N Buls,et al.  Influence of display quality on radiologists' performance in the detection of lung nodules on radiographs. , 2007, The British journal of radiology.

[9]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Experimental investigation on the choice of the tungsten/rhodium anode/filter combination for an amorphous selenium-based digital mammography system , 2006, European Radiology.

[10]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Development and implementation of a user friendly and automated environment for the creation of databases of digital mammograms with simulated microcalcifications , 2006, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[11]  Development and validation of a simulation procedure to study the visibility of micro calcifications in digital mammograms. , 2003, Medical physics.

[12]  C. D'Orsi,et al.  Detection of simulated lesions on data-compressed digital mammograms. , 2005, Radiology.

[13]  E Samei,et al.  Detection of subtle lung nodules: relative influence of quantum and anatomic noise on chest radiographs. , 1999, Radiology.

[14]  Dev P Chakraborty,et al.  Observer studies involving detection and localization: modeling, analysis, and validation. , 2004, Medical physics.

[15]  K. Berbaum,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis. Generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. , 1992, Investigative radiology.

[16]  A. Stacey,et al.  The detection and significance of calcifications in the breast: a radiological and pathological study. , 1976, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[18]  M Souto,et al.  Real and simulated clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. ROC study of observer performance. , 1997, Medical physics.

[19]  A Fandos-Morera,et al.  Breast tumors: composition of microcalcifications. , 1988, Radiology.

[20]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Validation of MTF measurement for digital mammography quality control. , 2005, Medical physics.

[21]  D. DeLong,et al.  Digital mammography: effects of reduced radiation dose on diagnostic performance. , 2007, Radiology.

[22]  Ann-Katherine Carton,et al.  Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms. , 2004, Medical physics.

[23]  Philip F. Judy,et al.  Lesion detection in digital mammograms , 2001, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[24]  M. Kallergi,et al.  Simulation model of mammographic calcifications based on the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, or BIRADS. , 1998, Academic radiology.

[25]  Charles E Metz,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic analysis: a tool for the quantitative evaluation of observer performance and imaging systems. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[26]  E. Samei,et al.  Dose dependence of mass and microcalcification detection in digital mammography: free response human observer studies. , 2007, Medical physics.