Spatial alignment facilitates visual comparison.

Humans have a uniquely sophisticated ability to see past superficial features and to understand the relational structure of the world around us. This ability often requires that we compare structures, finding commonalities and differences across visual depictions that are arranged in space, such as maps, graphs, or diagrams. Although such visual comparison of relational structures is ubiquitous in classrooms, textbooks, and news media, surprisingly little is known about how to facilitate this process. Here we suggest a new principle of spatial alignment, whereby visual comparison is substantially more efficient when visuals are placed perpendicular to their structural axes, such that the matching components of the visuals are in direct alignment. In four experiments, this direct alignment led to faster and more accurate comparison than other placements of the same patterns. We discuss the spatial alignment principle in connection to broader work on relational comparison and describe its implications for design and instruction. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

[1]  Eyal Sagi,et al.  What Difference Reveals About Similarity , 2012, Cogn. Sci..

[2]  Timothy J. Nokes-Malach,et al.  Effectiveness of holistic mental model confrontation in driving conceptual change , 2012 .

[3]  J. Call,et al.  Children's reasoning about spatial relational similarity: the effect of alignment and relational complexity. , 2012, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[4]  Denis Cousineau,et al.  Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson's method , 2005 .

[5]  B. Love,et al.  Beyond common features: The role of roles in determining similarity , 2007, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  Modeling Visual Problem Solving as Analogical Reasoning , 2017, Psychological review.

[7]  Jean-Pierre Thibaut,et al.  The development of analogy making in children: cognitive load and executive functions. , 2010, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[8]  Ellen M. Kok,et al.  Learning radiological appearances of diseases: Does comparison help? , 2013 .

[9]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Bootstrapping the Mind: Analogical Processes and Symbol Systems , 2010, Cogn. Sci..

[10]  L. Brooks,et al.  Role of specific similarity in a medical diagnostic task. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[11]  Dona M. Wong.  The Wall Street Journal Guide to Information Graphics: The Dos and Don'ts of Presenting Data, Facts, and Figures , 2010 .

[12]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Flexible cognitive resources: competitive content maps for attention and memory , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Learning by Analogical Bootstrapping , 2001 .

[14]  Kenneth D. Forbus,et al.  CogSketch: Sketch Understanding for Cognitive Science Research and for Education , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[15]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Relations, Objects, and the Composition of Analogies , 2006, Cogn. Sci..

[16]  S. Franconeri,et al.  Gestalt similarity groupings are not constructed in parallel , 2019, Cognition.

[17]  B. Rittle-Johnson,et al.  Does comparing solution methods facilitate conceptual and procedural knowledge? An experimental study on learning to solve equations. , 2007 .

[18]  K. Holyoak,et al.  Mapping conceptual to spatial relations in visual reasoning. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Martina A. Rau,et al.  Conditions for the Effectiveness of Multiple Visual Representations in Enhancing STEM Learning , 2017 .

[20]  D. Gentner,et al.  Comparison and Categorization in the Development of Relational Similarity , 1996 .

[21]  Markus Knauff,et al.  A theory and a computational model of spatial reasoning with preferred mental models. , 2013, Psychological review.

[22]  Ji Y. Son,et al.  Perceptual Learning Modules in Mathematics: Enhancing Students' Pattern Recognition, Structure Extraction, and Fluency , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[23]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Structure-Mapping: A Theoretical Framework for Analogy , 1983, Cogn. Sci..

[24]  M. Just,et al.  Constructing mental models of machines from text and diagrams. , 1993 .

[25]  Sarah A. Helseth,et al.  Flexible visual processing of spatial relationships , 2012, Cognition.

[26]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[27]  D. Gentner,et al.  Comparison in the Development of Categories , 1999 .

[28]  Robert M. French,et al.  Computational Models of Analogy-Making , 2003 .

[29]  Claus Bundesen,et al.  Visual pattern matching: Effects of size ratio, complexity, and similarity in simultaneous and successive matching , 1999 .

[30]  Barbara Tversky,et al.  Visualizing Thought , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[31]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structural Alignment during Similarity Comparisons , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[32]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Systematicity and Surface Similarity in the Development of Analogy , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[33]  Benjamin D. Jee,et al.  Enhancing the Comprehension of Science Text through Visual Analogies , 2011, CogSci.

[34]  R McGill,et al.  Graphical Perception and Graphical Methods for Analyzing Scientific Data , 1985, Science.

[35]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Relational similarity and the nonindependence of features in similarity judgments , 1991, Cognitive Psychology.

[36]  Thomas F. Shipley,et al.  Drawing on Experience: How Domain Knowledge Is Reflected in Sketches of Scientific Structures and Processes , 2014, Research in Science Education.

[37]  P. Kellman.  Adaptive and perceptual learning technologies in medical education and training. , 2013, Military medicine.

[38]  Brian Falkenhainer,et al.  The Structure-Mapping Engine: Algorithm and Examples , 1989, Artif. Intell..

[39]  Leonidas A A Doumas,et al.  A theory of the discovery and predication of relational concepts. , 2008, Psychological review.

[40]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. , 1997 .

[41]  Harold Pashler,et al.  A Boolean map theory of visual attention. , 2007, Psychological review.

[42]  C. Bundesen,et al.  Effects of spatial separation in visual pattern matching: evidence on the role of mental translation. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[43]  G. Woodman,et al.  The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[44]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Rapid Learning in a Children's Museum via Analogical Comparison , 2016, Cogn. Sci..

[45]  Shaaron E. Ainsworth,et al.  Drawing to Learn in Science , 2011, Science.

[46]  B. Farell,et al.  Same-different judgments: a review of current controversies in perceptual comparisons. , 1985, Psychological bulletin.

[47]  Jeffrey N. Rouder,et al.  A Structural Account of Global and Local Processing , 1999, Cognitive Psychology.

[48]  Kelly S. Mix,et al.  It's All Relative: Different Levels of Relational Similarity Used in Children's Comparisons. , 2008 .

[49]  M. Gattis.  Structure mapping in spatial reasoning , 2002 .

[50]  Robert McGill,et al.  Graphical Perception: The Visual Decoding of Quantitative Information on Graphical Displays of Data , 1987 .

[51]  Dedre Gentner,et al.  Detecting anomalous features in complex stimuli: the role of structured comparison. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[52]  John E. Hummel,et al.  The One-to-One Constraint in Analogical Mapping and Inference , 2005, Cogn. Sci..

[53]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[54]  Clarissa A. Thompson,et al.  How 15 hundred is like 15 cherries: effect of progressive alignment on representational changes in numerical cognition. , 2010, Child development.

[55]  Robert L. Goldstone,et al.  Time Course of Comparison , 1994 .

[56]  D. Uttal,et al.  Words and maps: developmental changes in mental models of spatial information acquired from descriptions and depictions. , 2006, Developmental science.

[57]  Paul Thagard,et al.  Analogical Mapping by Constraint Satisfaction , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[58]  D. Gentner,et al.  Analogical Processes in Children’s Understanding of Spatial Representations , 2017, Developmental psychology.

[59]  D. Gentner,et al.  Where Hypotheses Come From: Learning New Relations by Structural Alignment , 2010 .

[60]  Timothy J. Nokes-Malach,et al.  Learning Through Case Comparisons: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2013 .