Explaining the Assigned Goal-Incentive Interaction: The Role of Self-Efficacy and Personal Goals

This study was designed to replicate conceptually and to explain the goal-level vs. incentive-type interaction reported by Mowen, Middlemist, and Luther (1981) based on goal setting and social cognitive theories. Mowen et al. found that subjects performed more poorly with hard goals than medium goals under a bonus pay system, the opposite of what was found for a piece-rate system. In the present study, an hourly pay condition was added. Mowen et al.‘s interaction was replicated using a two-trial design in which subjects could obtain feedback about their ability to attain the incentive bonuses between trials. The experimental effects were completely mediated by personal goals and self-efficacy. Goal commitment was related to performance, but did not mediate the experimental conditions. The implications for the design of incentive systems are discussed.

[1]  Donald C. King,et al.  Do Goals Mediate the Effects of Incentives on Performance , 1980 .

[2]  Marilyn E. Gist,et al.  Self-Efficacy: A Theoretical Analysis of Its Determinants and Malleability , 1992 .

[3]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The motivation sequence, the motivation hub, and the motivation core. , 1991 .

[4]  E. A. Locke.  Toward a theory of task motivation and incentives , 1968 .

[5]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  The Effects of Goal Setting, Self-Efficacy, Competition, and Personal Traits on the Performance of an Endurance Task , 1995 .

[6]  Philip Bobko,et al.  Self-efficacy beliefs: Comparison of five measures. , 1994 .

[7]  Robert D. Pritchard,et al.  The influence of goal setting and financial incentives on task performance , 1973 .

[8]  J. W. Atkinson.  Motives In Fantasy, Action, And Society , 1958 .

[9]  J. Mowen,et al.  Joint effects of assigned goal level and incentive structure on task performance: A laboratory study. , 1981 .

[10]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. , 1996 .

[11]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  An Examination of the Relationships Among Monetary Incentives, Goal Level, Goal Commitment, and Performance , 1992 .

[12]  P. Wright.  Test of the mediating role of goals in the incentive-performance relationship. , 1989 .

[13]  Patrick M. Wright,et al.  Mediating Roles of Self-Set Goals, Goal Commitment, Self-Efficacy, and Attractiveness in the Incentive-Performance Relation , 1995 .

[14]  John R. Hollenbeck,et al.  On the meaning and measurement of goal commitment , 1994 .

[15]  J. Hollenbeck,et al.  An empirical examination of the antecedents of commitment to difficult goals. , 1989 .

[16]  A. Bandura.  Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[17]  A. Kohn.  Why incentive plans cannot work , 1993 .

[18]  Henry L. Tosi.  A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance , 1991 .

[19]  Terence R. Mitchell,et al.  Importance of participative goal setting and anticipated rewards on goal difficulty and job performance. , 1978 .

[20]  Miriam Erez,et al.  Effect of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal difficulty to performance , 1984 .

[21]  J. S. Phillips,et al.  The task-related competency and compliance aspects of goal setting: A clarification , 1988 .

[22]  P. Wright.  Monetary incentives and task experience as determinants of spontaneous goal setting, strategy development, and performance. , 1990 .

[23]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[24]  Edwin A. Locke,et al.  Type A behavior and faculty research productivity: What are the mechanisms? , 1984 .

[25]  D. Nebeker,et al.  The Influence of Monetary Incentives on Goal Choice, Goal Commitment, and Task Performance , 1988 .

[26]  T. Connolly,et al.  Goals, strategy development and task performance: Some limits on the efficacy of goal setting , 1989 .