Understanding Evolution of Inter-Group Relationships Using Bipartite Networks

In online social systems, users with common affiliations or interests form social groups for discussing various topical issues. We study the relationships among these social groups, which manifest through users who are common members of multiple groups, and the evolution of these relationships as new users join the groups. Focusing on a certain number of the most popular groups, we model the group memberships of users as a subclass of bipartite networks, known as Alphabetic Bipartite Networks (α-BiNs), where one of the partitions contains a fixed number of nodes (the popular groups) while the other grows unboundedly with time (new users joining the groups). Specifically, we consider the evolution of the thresholded projection of the user-group bipartite network onto the set of groups, which accurately represents the inter-group relationships. We propose and solve a preferential attachment based growth model for evolution of α-BiNs, and analytically compute the degree distribution of the thresholded projection. We further investigate whether the predictions of this model can explain the projection degree distributions of user-group networks derived from several real social systems (Livejournal, Youtube and Flickr). The study also shows that the inter-group network is tightly knit, and there is an implicit semantic hierarchy within its structure, that is clearly identified by the method of thresholding. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first attempt to analytically model the dynamical relationships among groups in online social systems.

[1]  F. Chung,et al.  Generalizations of Polya's urn Problem , 2003 .

[2]  M. Newman,et al.  Epidemics and percolation in small-world networks. , 1999, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[3]  Niloy Ganguly,et al.  Emergence of a non-scaling degree distribution in bipartite networks: A numerical and analytical study , 2007 .

[4]  Yi-Cheng Zhang,et al.  Empirical analysis of web-based user-object bipartite networks , 2009, ArXiv.

[5]  Dmitri V. Krioukov,et al.  Hidden Variables in Bipartite Networks , 2011, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[6]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[7]  Lada A. Adamic,et al.  Information flow in social groups , 2003, cond-mat/0305305.

[8]  Lise Getoor,et al.  Co-evolution of social and affiliation networks , 2009, KDD.

[9]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  Measurement and analysis of online social networks , 2007, IMC '07.

[10]  M. Newman,et al.  Hierarchical structure and the prediction of missing links in networks , 2008, Nature.

[11]  Bosiljka Tadic,et al.  Patterns of Emotional Blogging and Emergence of Communities: Agent-Based Model on Bipartite Networks , 2011, ArXiv.

[12]  S H Strogatz,et al.  Random graph models of social networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  Jie Ren,et al.  How to project a bipartite network? , 2007, 0707.0540.

[14]  Tatsuya Akutsu,et al.  On the degree distribution of projected networks mapped from bipartite networks , 2011 .

[15]  B. M. Hill,et al.  Exchangeable Urn Processes , 1987 .

[16]  Hosam M. Mahmoud,et al.  Polya Urn Models , 2008 .

[17]  S. Morris,et al.  Social inertia in collaboration networks. , 2005, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[18]  Wang Dahui,et al.  Bipartite Producer-Consumer Networks and the Size Distribution of Firms , 2006 .

[19]  Matthieu Latapy,et al.  Link prediction in bipartite graphs using internal links and weighted projection , 2011, 2011 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM WKSHPS).

[20]  Roger Guimerà,et al.  Team Assembly Mechanisms Determine Collaboration Network Structure and Team Performance , 2005, Science.

[21]  Niloy Ganguly,et al.  Understanding how both the partitions of a bipartite network affect its one-mode projection , 2011, 1105.3902.

[22]  An Zeng,et al.  Behavior patterns of online users and the effect on information filtering , 2011, ArXiv.

[23]  Yi-Cheng Zhang,et al.  Bipartite network projection and personal recommendation. , 2007, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[24]  Jure Leskovec,et al.  The life and death of online groups: predicting group growth and longevity , 2012, WSDM '12.

[25]  Thilo Gross,et al.  Emergent bipartiteness in a society of knights and knaves , 2011, ArXiv.

[26]  M. Newman,et al.  Random graphs with arbitrary degree distributions and their applications. , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[27]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  Group formation in large social networks: membership, growth, and evolution , 2006, KDD '06.

[28]  Krishna P. Gummadi,et al.  A measurement-driven analysis of information propagation in the flickr social network , 2009, WWW '09.

[29]  Niloy Ganguly,et al.  Modeling discrete combinatorial systems as alphabetic bipartite networks: theory and applications. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[30]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Self-organization of collaboration networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[31]  Jerzy Jaworski,et al.  The degree of a typical vertex in generalized random intersection graph models , 2006, Discret. Math..

[32]  Niloy Ganguly,et al.  Information dissemination dynamics in delay tolerant network: a bipartite network approach , 2012, MobiOpp '12.