Correction to Acerbi and Tennie (2016)

Reports an error in "The role of redundant information in cultural transmission and cultural stabilization" by Alberto Acerbi and Claudio Tennie (Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2016[Feb], Vol 130[1], 62-70). In the article the copyright should have been "© 2016 The Author(s)". The author note also should have included the following license statement "This article has been published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Copyright for this article is retained by the author(s). Author(s) grant(s) the American Psychological Association the exclusive right to publish the article and identify itself as the original publisher." The online version of this article has been corrected. (The following abstract of the original article appeared in record 2016-07004-005.) Redundant copying has been proposed as a manner to achieve the high-fidelity necessary to pass on and preserve complex traits in human cultural transmission. There are at least 2 ways to define redundant copying. One refers to the possibility of copying repeatedly the same trait over time, and another to the ability to exploit multiple layers of information pointing to the same trait during a single copying event. Using an individual-based model, we explore how redundant copying (defined as in the latter way) helps to achieve successful transmission. The authors show that increasing redundant copying increases the likelihood of accurately transmitting a behavior more than either augmenting the number of copying occasions across time or boosting the general accuracy of social learning. They also investigate how different cost functions, deriving, for example, from the need to invest more energy in cognitive processing, impact the evolution of redundant copying. The authors show that populations converge either to high-fitness/high-costs states (with high redundant copying and complex culturally transmitted behaviors; resembling human culture) or to low-fitness/low-costs states (with low redundant copying and simple transmitted behaviors; resembling social learning forms typical of nonhuman animals). This outcome may help to explain why cumulative culture is rare in the animal kingdom. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).

[1]  T. Caraco,et al.  Foraging choice in laboratory rats: Constant vs. variable delay , 1988, Behavioural Processes.

[2]  E. Tolman The determiners of behavior at a choice point. , 1938 .

[3]  W. Schultz,et al.  Choice mechanisms for past, temporally extended outcomes , 2015, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[4]  Andrew M. Wikenheiser,et al.  Subjective costs drive overly patient foraging strategies in rats on an intertemporal foraging task , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  D. Lerman,et al.  The effects of reinforcement magnitude on functional analysis outcomes. , 2005, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[6]  K. Spence Mathematical formulations of learning phenomena. , 1952, Psychological review.

[7]  Wolfram Schultz,et al.  Behavioral reactions reflecting differential reward expectations in monkeys , 2001, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  J. Weatherly,et al.  Investigating the procedural variables that determine whether rats will display negative anticipatory contrast or positive induction , 2005, Behavioural Processes.

[9]  H. C. Cromwell,et al.  Relative reward effects on operant behavior: Incentive contrast, induction and variety effects , 2015, Behavioural Processes.

[10]  Effects of amphetamine and methylphenidate on delay discounting in rats: interactions with order of delay presentation , 2013, Psychopharmacology.

[11]  E. Weber,et al.  Predicting Risk-Sensitivity in Humans and Lower Animals: Risk as Variance or Coefficient of Variation , 2004, Psychological review.