National-level infrastructure and economic effects of switchgrass cofiring with coal in existing power plants for carbon mitigation.

We update a previously presented Linear Programming (LP) methodology for estimating state level costs for reducing CO2 emissions from existing coal-fired power plants by cofiring switchgrass, a biomass energy crop, and coal. This paper presents national level results of applying the methodology to the entire portion of the United States in which switchgrass could be grown without irrigation. We present incremental switchgrass and coal cofiring carbon cost of mitigation curves along with a presentation of regionally specific cofiring economics and policy issues. The results show that cofiring 189 million dry short tons of switchgrass with coal in the existing U.S. coal-fired electricity generation fleet can mitigate approximately 256 million short tons of carbon-dioxide (CO2) per year, representing a 9% reduction of 2005 electricity sector CO2 emissions. Total marginal costs, including capital, labor, feedstock, and transportation, range from $20 to $86/ton CO2 mitigated,with average costs ranging from $20 to $45/ton. If some existing power plants upgrade to boilers designed for combusting switchgrass, an additional 54 million tons of switchgrass can be cofired. In this case, total marginal costs range from $26 to $100/ton CO2 mitigated, with average costs ranging from $20 to $60/ton. Costs for states east of the Mississippi River are largely unaffected by boiler replacement; Atlantic seaboard states represent the lowest cofiring cost of carbon mitigation. The central plains states west of the Mississippi River are most affected by the boiler replacement option and, in general, go from one of the lowest cofiring cost of carbon mitigation regions to the highest. We explain the variation in transportation expenses and highlight regional cost of mitigation variations as transportation overwhelms other cofiring costs.

[1]  D. Ugarte,et al.  Biomass and bioenergy applications of the POLYSYS modeling framework 1 1 Paper prepared for presenta , 2000 .

[2]  David William Keith,et al.  Engineering economic analysis of biomass IGCC with carbon capture and storage , 2005 .

[3]  Alexander Wokaun,et al.  Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies , 1999 .

[4]  Bruce A. McCarl,et al.  Competitiveness of biomass‐fueled electrical power plants , 2000, Ann. Oper. Res..

[5]  Paulina J Aramillo,et al.  Comparative life-cycle air emissions of coal, domestic natural gas, LNG, and SNG for electricity generation. , 2007 .

[6]  Eric Croiset,et al.  Techno-economic study of CO2 capture from an existing coal-fired power plant: MEA scrubbing vs. O2/CO2 recycle combustion , 2003 .

[7]  Gabriel Gallagher,et al.  Biomass for electricity generation , 2001 .

[8]  S. B. McLaughlin,et al.  A review of carbon and nitrogen balances in switchgrass grown for energy , 1998 .

[9]  L. J. Allison,et al.  ORRECL-Oak Ridge Energy Crop County Level Database , 1996 .

[10]  Howard J. Herzog,et al.  CO2 capture and storage: Costs and market potential , 2005 .

[11]  Robin L. Graham,et al.  Biomass Feedstock Availability in the United States: 1999 State Level Analysis , 2000 .

[12]  Timothy L. Johnson,et al.  Fossil electricity and CO2 sequestration: how natural gas prices, initial conditions and retrofits determine the cost of controlling CO2 emissions , 2004 .

[13]  G. A. Peterson,et al.  Measurement of Net Global Warming Potential in Three Agroecosystems , 2005, Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems.

[14]  M. Mann,et al.  A life cycle assessment of biomass cofiring in a coal-fired power plant , 2001 .

[15]  W. Parton,et al.  Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems. , 2007, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[16]  D. Tilman,et al.  Carbon-Negative Biofuels from Low-Input High-Diversity Grassland Biomass , 2006, Science.

[17]  A L Robinson,et al.  Assessment of potential carbon dioxide reductions due to biomass-coal cofiring in the United States. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  R. Lal,et al.  Potential Soil Carbon Sequestration and CO2 Offset by Dedicated Energy Crops in the USA , 2006 .