The Size and Power of the Variance Ratio Test in Finite Samples: a Monte Carlo Investigation

We examine the finite sample properties of the variance ratio test of the random walk hypothesis via Monte Carlo simulations under two null and three alternative hypotheses. These results are compared to the performance of the Dickey-Fuller t and the Box-Pierce Q statistics. Under the null hypothesis of a random walk with independent and identically distributed Gaussian increments, the empirical size of all three tests are comparable. Under a heteroscedastic random walk null, the variance ratio test is more reliable than either the Dickey-Fuller or Box-Pierce tests. We compute the power of these three tests against three alternatives of recent empirical interest: a stationary AR(1), the sum of this AR(1) and a random walk, and an integrated AR( 1). By choosing the sampling frequency appropriately, the variance ratio test is shown to be as powerful as the Dickey-Fuller and Box-Pierce tests against the stationary alternative, and is more powerful than either of the two tests against the two unit-root alternatives.

[1]  G. Schwert,et al.  Tests for Unit Roots: a Monte Carlo Investigation , 1988 .

[2]  John H. Cochrane,et al.  How Big Is the Random Walk in GNP? , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[3]  E. Fama,et al.  Permanent and Temporary Components of Stock Prices , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[4]  P. Phillips.  Regression Theory for Near-Integrated Time Series , 1988 .

[5]  K. French,et al.  Expected stock returns and volatility , 1987 .

[6]  G. William Schwert,et al.  Effects of model specification on tests for unit roots in macroeconomic data , 1987 .

[7]  P. Phillips.  Time series regression with a unit root , 1987 .

[8]  A. Lo,et al.  Stock Market Prices Do Not Follow Random Walks: Evidence from a Simple Specification Test , 1987 .

[9]  J. Huizinga.  An empirical investigation of the long-run behavior of real exchange rates , 1987 .

[10]  W. Buiter.  An empirical investigation of the long-run behavior of real exchange rates comment on the huizinga paper , 1987 .

[11]  F. Diebold.  Deviations from random-walk behavior: tests based on the variance-time function , 1987 .

[12]  P. Phillips.  Testing for a Unit Root in Time Series Regression , 1988 .

[13]  L. Summers.  Does the Stock Market Rationally Reflect Fundamental Values , 1986 .

[14]  John Y. Campbell,et al.  Are Output Fluctuations Transitory? , 1986 .

[15]  W. Newey,et al.  A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelationconsistent Covariance Matrix , 1986 .

[16]  Pierre Perron.  Tests of Joint Hypotheses for Time Series Regression with a Unit Root , 1986 .

[17]  R. Shiller,et al.  Testing the Random Walk Hypothesis: Power Versus Frequency of Observation , 1985 .

[18]  N. Savin,et al.  Testing the autoregressive parameter with the t statistic , 1985 .

[19]  Jean-Marie Dufour,et al.  Some Robust Exact Results on Sample Autocorrelations and Tests of Randomness , 1985 .

[20]  Stephen J. Taylor.  Estimating the Variances of Autocorrelations Calculated from Financial Time Series , 1984 .

[21]  R. Shiller.  Stock Prices and Social Dynamics , 1984 .

[22]  N. Savin,et al.  Testing for Unit Roots: 2 , 1984 .

[23]  J. Poterba,et al.  The Persistence of Volatility and Stock Market Fluctuations , 1984 .

[24]  Robert C. Merton,et al.  Dividend variability and variance bounds tests for the rationality of stock market prices , 1984 .

[25]  H. White,et al.  Nonlinear Regression with Dependent Observations , 1984 .

[26]  D. B. Preston.  Spectral Analysis and Time Series , 1983 .

[27]  Andrew Harvey,et al.  Spectral Analysis and Time Series, M. B. Priestly. Two volumes, 890 pages plus preface, indexes, references and appendices, London: Academic Press, 1981. Price in the UK: Vol. I, £49‐60: Vol. II, £20‐60 , 1982 .

[28]  R. Engle.  Autoregressive conditional heteroscedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation , 1982 .

[29]  N. Savin,et al.  The Calculation of the Limiting Distribution of the Least Squares Estimator of the Parameter in a Random Walk Model , 1981 .

[30]  W. Fuller,et al.  LIKELIHOOD RATIO STATISTICS FOR AUTOREGRESSIVE TIME SERIES WITH A UNIT ROOT , 1981 .

[31]  N. Savin,et al.  Testing for Unit Roots: 1 , 1981 .

[32]  C. Nelson,et al.  A new approach to decomposition of economic time series into permanent and transitory components with particular attention to measurement of the ‘business cycle’☆ , 1981 .

[33]  R. Shiller,et al.  The Use of Volatility Measures in Assessing Market Efficiency , 1980 .

[34]  H. White.  A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Covariance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test for Heteroskedasticity , 1980 .

[35]  W. Fuller,et al.  Distribution of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with a Unit Root , 1979 .

[36]  Leslie Godfrey,et al.  Testing the adequacy of a time series model , 1979 .

[37]  R. Hall.  Stochastic Implications of the Life Cycle-Permanent Income Hypothesis: Theory and Evidence , 1978, Journal of Political Economy.

[38]  J. Hausman.  Specification tests in econometrics , 1978 .

[39]  R. Lucas.  ASSET PRICES IN AN EXCHANGE ECONOMY , 1978 .

[40]  G. Box,et al.  On a measure of lack of fit in time series models , 1978 .

[41]  Chris Chatfield,et al.  Introduction to Statistical Time Series. , 1976 .

[42]  C. Nelson,et al.  The Stochastic Structure of the Velocity of Money , 1974 .

[43]  G. Box,et al.  Distribution of Residual Autocorrelations in Autoregressive-Integrated Moving Average Time Series Models , 1970 .

[44]  J. Muth.  Optimal Properties of Exponentially Weighted Forecasts , 1960 .