The concept of intrinsic fantasy has been considered central to the aim of usefully applying the positive affect of computer games to learning. Games with intrinsic fantasy are defined as having “an integral and continuing relationship with the instructional content being presented”, and are claimed as “more interesting and more educational” than extrinsic fantasy games [1]. Studies of children making educational games have shown they usually create extrinsic games for curriculum learning content. In this study, children were encouraged to create non-curriculum games, more easily distanced from the extrinsic preconceptions of formal schooling. Forty, 7-11 year olds took part in this study (17 boys and 23 girls), designing and making their own games at an after-school club. Despite non-curriculum learning content, no more intrinsic games were created than in previous studies. The children failed to create their own pedagogical models for non-curriculum content and did not see the educational value of intrinsic fantasy games. The implications for transfer and learning in intrinsic games are discussed whilst the definition of intrinsic fantasy itself is questioned. It is argued that the integral relationship of fantasy is unlikely to be the most critical means of improving the educational effectiveness of digital games.
[1]
Thomas W. Malone,et al.
Guidelines for Designing Educational Computer Programs.
,
1983
.
[2]
Thomas W. Malone,et al.
What makes things fun to learn? heuristics for designing instructional computer games
,
1980,
SIGSMALL '80.
[3]
Lloyd P. Rieber,et al.
Project KID DESIGNER: Constructivism at Work through Play
,
1998
.
[4]
Thomas W. Malone,et al.
Toward a Theory of Intrinsically Motivating Instruction
,
1981,
Cogn. Sci..
[5]
Larry Tesler,et al.
Novice Programming Comes of Age
,
2001,
Your Wish is My Command.
[6]
David Leheny.
The Rules of Play
,
2003
.
[7]
Jean Underwood,et al.
Learning graphical programming: an evaluation of KidSim
,
1995,
PPIG.