Inversion of heterogeneous parabolic-type equations using the pilot points method

SUMMARY The inverse problem (also referred to as parameter estimation) consists of evaluating the medium properties ruling the behaviour of a given equation from direct measurements of those properties and of the dependent state variables. The problem becomes ill-posed when the properties vary spatially in an unknown manner, which is often the case when modelling natural processes. A possibility toght this problem consists of performing stochastic conditional simulations. That is, instead of seeking a single solution (conditional estimation), one obtains an ensemble ofelds, all of which honour the small scale variability (high frequencyuctuations) and direct measurements. The high frequency component of the �eld is dierent from one simulation to another, but axed component for all of them. Measurements of the dependent state variables are honoured by framing simulation as an inverse problem, where both modelt and parameter plausibility are maximized with respect to the coecients of the basis functions (pilot point values). These coecients (model parameters) are used for parameterizing the large scale variability patterns. The pilot points method, which is often used in hydrogeology, uses the kriging weights as basis functions. The performance of the method (both its variants of conditional estimation=simulation) is tested on a synthetic example using a parabolic-type equation. Results show that including the plausibility term improves the identication of the spatial variability of the unknown �eld function and that the weight assigned to the plausibility term does lead to optimal results both for conditional estimation and for stochastic simulations. Copyright ? 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  N. Zabaras,et al.  Stochastic inverse heat conduction using a spectral approach , 2004 .

[2]  Andrés Sahuquillo,et al.  Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data 2. Demonstration on a synthetic aquifer , 1997 .

[3]  Jesús Carrera,et al.  Computational techniques for optimization of problems involving non-linear transient simulations , 1999 .

[4]  G. Marsily,et al.  Regards sur 40 ans de problèmes inverses en hydrogéologie , 1999 .

[5]  P. C. Shah,et al.  Reservoir History Matching by Bayesian Estimation , 1976 .

[6]  Andres Alcolea,et al.  Inverse problem in hydrogeology , 2005 .

[7]  John Doherty,et al.  Ground Water Model Calibration Using Pilot Points and Regularization , 2003, Ground water.

[8]  Ghislain de Marsily,et al.  Three‐dimensional interference test interpretation in a fractured aquifer using the Pilot Point Inverse Method , 2001 .

[9]  M. Boucher,et al.  Interpretation of Interference Tests in a Well Field Using Geostatistical Techniques to Fit the Permeability Distribution in a Reservoir Model , 1984 .

[10]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Estimation of Aquifer Parameters Under Transient and Steady State Conditions: 3. Application to Synthetic and Field Data , 1986 .

[11]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Estimation of Aquifer Parameters Under Transient and Steady State Conditions: 1. Maximum Likelihood Method Incorporating Prior Information , 1986 .

[12]  M. Marietta,et al.  Pilot Point Methodology for Automated Calibration of an Ensemble of conditionally Simulated Transmissivity Fields: 1. Theory and Computational Experiments , 1995 .

[13]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady-state conditions: 2 , 1986 .

[14]  A. S. Cullick,et al.  Construction of geostatistical aquifer models integrating dynamic flow and tracer data using inverse technique , 2002 .

[15]  D. Marquardt An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[16]  D. McLaughlin,et al.  A Reassessment of the Groundwater Inverse Problem , 1996 .

[17]  D. Schnur,et al.  An inverse method for determining elastic material properties and a material interface , 1992 .

[18]  S. Finsterle,et al.  Estimating flow parameter distributions using ground-penetrating radar and hydrological measurements , 2004 .

[19]  Jean-Robert Clermont,et al.  Numerical simulation of complex flows of non‐Newtonian fluids using the stream tube method and memory integral constitutive equations , 1995 .

[20]  L. Gu,et al.  Moving kriging interpolation and element‐free Galerkin method , 2003 .

[21]  Catherine Certes,et al.  Application of the pilot point method to the identification of aquifer transmissivities , 1991 .

[22]  Andres Alcolea,et al.  Pilot points method incorporating prior information for solving the groundwater flow inverse problem , 2006 .

[23]  Yuhong Liu,et al.  Improving Sequential Simulation with a Structured Path Guided by Information Content , 2004 .

[24]  R. Freeze A stochastic‐conceptual analysis of one‐dimensional groundwater flow in nonuniform homogeneous media , 1975 .

[25]  Tianhong Ouyang Analysis of parameter estimation heat conduction problems with phase change using the finite element method , 1992 .

[26]  W. Yeh Review of Parameter Identification Procedures in Groundwater Hydrology: The Inverse Problem , 1986 .

[27]  A. Sahuquillo,et al.  Stochastic simulation of transmissivity fields conditional to both transmissivity and piezometric data—I. Theory , 1997 .

[28]  J. C. Ramírez,et al.  Estimation of aquifer parameters under transient and steady-state conditions , 1984 .

[29]  J. Carrera,et al.  Geostatistical inversion of coupled problems: dealing with computational burden and different types of data , 2003 .

[30]  M. G. Marietta,et al.  Pilot Point Methodology for Automated Calibration of an Ensemble of Conditionally Simulated Transmissivity Fields: 2. Application , 1995 .