Bridging Worlds: Information Systems Development Through Cross-Cultural Comparison

This paper reports a case study where soft systems methodology (SSM) was used to help automate a largely manual administrative (examination) information system in a Pakistani university. Various design suggestions for information system improvements, both administrative and IT-supported were made (and implemented) through comparison with another university in Denmark which is well supported by computer systems. An action design research approach with an interpretative epistemology/ontology was adopted. Though the single comparison experience is difficult to generalise, we conclude that SSM (with some adaptations) can enable a socio-technical comparison and design effort and offer a prototype process. The comparison stimulates forward-looking design, but great care must be taken to accommodate cultural differences, and further research is necessary to integrate more sophisticated cultural analysis tools into the design process. The research extends SSM in information system development—from a single situational analysis to a comparative process and can be adapted as a pattern for practitioners with similar automation needs.

[1]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Diversity in information systems action research methods , 1998 .

[2]  Sandeep Purao,et al.  Action Design Research , 2011, MIS Q..

[3]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  Information systems in developing countries: a critical research review , 2008, J. Inf. Technol..

[4]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Information Systems and Developing Countries: Failure, Success, and Local Improvisations , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[5]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[6]  Nimal Jayaratna,et al.  Understanding and Evaluating Methodologies: NIMSAD, a Systematic Framework , 1994 .

[7]  Robert B. Burns,et al.  Introduction to Research Methods , 2015, Research Methods for Political Science.

[8]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Knowledge for Theory and Practice , 2006 .

[9]  Martin Orr,et al.  Managing organizational change by using soft systems thinking in action research projects , 2009 .

[10]  B. Latour.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[11]  G. Susman,et al.  An Assessment of the Scientific Merits of Action Research. , 1978 .

[12]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Interaction, transformation and information systems development - an extended application of Soft Systems Methodology , 2002, Inf. Technol. People.

[13]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Information, Systems, And Information Systems , 1997 .

[14]  W. Orlikowski.  The Duality of Technology: Rethinking the Concept of Technology in Organizations , 2014 .

[15]  Dionysis Bochtis,et al.  Conceptual model of fleet management in agriculture , 2010 .

[16]  Peter Checkland,et al.  A role for soft systems methodology in information systems development , 1995 .

[17]  David E. Avison,et al.  INFORMATION SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT , 2006 .

[18]  Fred H. Blum,et al.  Action Research--A Scientific Approach? , 1955, Philosophy of Science.

[19]  R. Rapoport.  Three Dilemmas in Action Research , 1970 .

[20]  Jeremy Rose.  Interaction Modelling in Soft Systems Methodology: Checkland's Unrecognised Modelling Form , 2001 .

[21]  Judy McKay,et al.  The dual imperatives of action research , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[22]  Yao-Jen Chang,et al.  Action Research as a Bridge Between Two Worlds: Helping The NGOs and Humanitarian Agencies Adapt Technology to Their Needs , 2010 .

[23]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Interaction and Transformation in SSM , 1996, ECIS.

[24]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the "IT" in IT Research - A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[25]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Interaction and Transformation in Soft Systems Methodology , 1996 .

[26]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  Multiview - An Exploration in Information Systems Development , 1986, Aust. Comput. J..

[27]  A. Pettigrew.  On Studying Organizational Cultures , 1979 .

[28]  M. Bond,et al.  Hofstede's Culture Dimensions , 1984 .

[29]  Jeremy Rose,et al.  Soft systems methodology as a social science research tool , 1997 .

[30]  Trevor Wood-Harper,et al.  A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research , 1996, J. Inf. Technol..

[31]  Richard Baskerville,et al.  Investigating Information Systems with Action Research , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[32]  Hasmiah Kasimin,et al.  The use of a soft systems approach in developing information systems for development planning: An exploration in regional planning , 1996 .

[33]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[34]  Lars Mathiassen,et al.  Making SPI happen: the IDEAL distribution of effort , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[35]  P. Checkland.  Soft Systems Methodology: A Thirty Year Retrospective a , 2000 .

[36]  Alan R. Hevner,et al.  Design Science in Information Systems Research , 2004, MIS Q..

[37]  David E. Avison,et al.  Controlling action research projects , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.